# Top 7 Best Screenshot APIs to Automate Web Page Captures in 2026
> **Quick answer**: Screenshot APIs automate web page captures via HTTP requests, eliminating manual headless browser management. In 2026, leading solutions like CaptureKit ($7/month) and ScreenshotOne ($17/month) handle rate limits, rendering quality, and cookie banner removal differently. Costs range from $1.75 to $9.60 per thousand captures. For sales and marketing teams building prospect lists from web audits, Derrick enriches contact data directly in Google Sheets with emails, phone numbers, and company details at €9/month with 100 monthly credits.
> **Summary** Looking for a reliable solution to automate website screenshot generation at scale? Screenshot APIs are transforming how marketing, SEO, and development teams document, monitor, and test their web applications. In 2026, the screenshot API market has matured significantly. Gone are the days of manually managing headless browser clusters or writing fragile Puppeteer scripts. Today, a […]
*Published: 2026-01-01 · Updated: 2026-04-30 · Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/en/screenshot-api-2/*
---
Looking for a reliable solution to automate website screenshot generation at scale? Screenshot APIs are transforming how marketing, SEO, and development teams document, monitor, and test their web applications.
In 2026, the screenshot API market has matured significantly. Gone are the days of manually managing headless browser clusters or writing fragile Puppeteer scripts. Today, a simple HTTP request is all you need to capture any webpage in seconds.
But not all screenshot APIs are created equal. Some cap at 40 requests per minute, others charge double for the same features. Some struggle to block GDPR cookie banners, others generate blurry captures on mobile devices.
In this guide, we’ve tested the 7 leading screenshot APIs on the market to help you choose the one that truly fits your needs and budget.
TL;DR
CaptureKit leads with a starting price of $7 per month and no strict per-minute limits. ScreenshotOne offers the best visual quality but costs $17 per month. ApiFlash excels in speed with sub-1-second response times. ScreenshotAPI.net provides the best value for budget-conscious projects.
Enrich Your Prospecting Data Automatically
Derrick finds emails, phone numbers, and company info for your prospects directly in Google Sheets. Perfect for enriching contacts discovered during web audits.
[Try for free →](https://derrick-app.com?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=cta?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=cta&utm_campaign=primary_cta)
## Our Selection Criteria for This Comparison
We evaluated each screenshot API based on 7 objective criteria that matter in production:
**1. Pricing and cost per thousand (CPM)**
The entry price isn’t enough. We calculated the cost for 1,000 captures at different pricing tiers to identify true value for money.
**2. Rate limits and scalability**
How many concurrent requests can the API handle? Are per-minute limits a bottleneck for your workflows?
**3. Average response time**
We measured generation speed across 20 different URLs (static sites, JavaScript-heavy sites, media-rich pages).
**4. Capture quality**
Image sharpness, font rendering, dynamic element handling, video and animation support.
**5. Advanced features**
Automatic cookie banner removal, ad blocking, full-page capture, mobile emulation, PDF export, S3 storage.
**6. Reliability and uptime**
Availability rate, error handling, response time under load.
**7. Documentation and integrations**
Documentation clarity, available SDKs, no-code integrations (Zapier, Make, n8n).
## Quick Comparison: Top 7 Screenshot APIs in 2026
| Rank | Screenshot API | Starting Price | Effective CPM | Rate Limits | Uptime | Best For |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CaptureKit](https://www.capturekit.dev/) | $7/mo | $7 → $1.78 | No strict limits | 99.9% | Frictionless scaling |
| 2 | ScreenshotOne | $17/mo | $9.6 → $5.2 | 40-150 req/min | 98.6% | Premium quality |
| 3 | ScreenshotAPI.net | $9/mo | $9 → $1.75 | 20-80 req/min | 99% | Scheduled bulk capture |
| 4 | ApiFlash | $7/mo | Variable | Per plan | Not displayed | Speed and simplicity |
| 5 | Screenshot.fyi | Variable | Variable | Per plan | Not displayed | Daily projects |
| 6 | Screenshotlayer | Free then paid | Pay-as-you-go | Variable | Not displayed | Occasional use |
| 7 | Site-Shot | Variable | Variable | Per plan | Not displayed | Custom solutions |
## 1. CaptureKit – The Best Screenshot API for Limitless Scaling
**Best For**: Teams that need to generate thousands of screenshots without worrying about rate limits
CaptureKit is our top choice for one simple reason: it’s the only screenshot API that eliminates artificial per-minute limits across all pricing plans. Where competitors cap at 40-150 requests per minute, CaptureKit auto-scales based on your actual load.
Practically speaking, if you’re Sarah, Head of SEO at an agency monitoring 500 client sites, you can launch a complete screenshot audit in one go. No need to batch into chunks, no need to wait 45 minutes for 500 requests to trickle through a rate limiter.
**Strengths**:
- **Ultra-competitive pricing**: $7/month to start, less than half the price of ScreenshotOne
- **100 free credits** at signup, no credit card required
- **No per-minute request limits** on standard plans (intelligent auto-scaling)
- **Interactive playground** to test your parameters before coding
- **Automatic removal** of cookie banners and ads
- **Native no-code integrations** with Zapier, Make, and n8n
- **Integrated S3 storage** to automatically host your captures
- **Proxy support** to bypass geographic restrictions
- **Average response time**: ~7 seconds (tested across 20 varied URLs)
- **Exceptional uptime**: 99.9% availability
**Weaknesses**:
- Documentation less extensive than ScreenshotOne (but more than adequate)
- No official SDK for all languages (but simple HTTP is sufficient)
**Pricing**:
- **Free plan**: 100 test credits
- **Starter**: $7/month for 1,000 screenshots
- **Growth**: Scalable plans by volume
- **Enterprise**: Custom pricing for very high volumes
**Real-world use case**:
Mike, founder of a competitor monitoring SaaS, automatically generates 3,000 daily screenshots of client landing pages. With CaptureKit, he pays $49/month instead of the $170 he was spending with ScreenshotOne. Annual savings: $1,452.
**API Example**:
```
GET https://api.capturekit.dev/capture?access_key=YOUR_KEY&url=https://example.com&full_page=true&remove_cookie_banners=true
```
The endpoint directly returns the image or an S3 URL if you enable the `s3_url=true` parameter.
**Verdict**: CaptureKit is unbeatable for teams wanting to scale quickly without breaking the bank or fighting arbitrary rate limits. If you’re generating 1,000+ screenshots per month, it’s the best value-for-money on the market.
## 2. ScreenshotOne – The Reference for Visual Quality
**Best For**: Projects where pixel-perfect quality is non-negotiable
ScreenshotOne is the most mature screenshot API on the market, created by Dmytro who has invested years perfecting every rendering detail. If you’ve ever seen a blurry screenshot or poorly rendered fonts, you’ll understand why ScreenshotOne excels.
The API integrates a database of over 50,000 heuristic rules to automatically block the most complex cookie banners. Where other APIs miss 30% of GDPR popups, ScreenshotOne achieves close to a 95% success rate.
**Strengths**:
- **Exceptional visual quality**: Retina Display rendering, ultra-sharp fonts
- **50,000+ rules** to block cookies, ads, popups, chats
- **Comprehensive documentation** with examples in all languages
- **Official SDKs** for Python, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby, Go
- **Native dark mode**: Capture in dark theme with a simple parameter
- **Device emulation**: iPhone, iPad, Android with precision
- **Video support**: Interaction recording (premium plans)
- **Very active founder** on support and feature requests
**Weaknesses**:
- **High price**: $17/month, 2.4× the price of CaptureKit
- **Strict rate limits**: 40-150 req/min depending on plan (frustrating for rapid scaling)
- **Slightly lower uptime**: 98.6% vs 99.9% for CaptureKit
**Pricing**:
- **Free plan**: 100 test screenshots
- **Pro**: $17/month for 2,000 screenshots
- **Business**: From $49/month
- **Enterprise**: Custom pricing
**Real-world use case**:
Emily, Product Manager at a fintech, uses ScreenshotOne to automatically generate customer dashboard previews. Retina quality is crucial as these captures are displayed in sales presentations. The extra cost is justified by commercial ROI.
**Verdict**: If your budget allows and visual quality is critical, ScreenshotOne is the best choice. But for 90% of use cases (monitoring, documentation, archiving), CaptureKit offers vastly superior value for money.
## 3. ScreenshotAPI.net – Best for Scheduled Mass Capture
**Best For**: Automated workflows with scheduled capture (cron jobs)
ScreenshotAPI.net stands out with its **scheduled screenshots** feature based on cron expressions. You can schedule hourly, daily, or weekly captures without managing the infrastructure yourself.
The API also offers a **bulk capture** function where you simply upload a CSV file of URLs and retrieve all captures at once. Perfect for monthly SEO audits or competitive monitoring.
**Strengths**:
- **Scheduled screenshots** with cron expressions (hourly, daily, weekly)
- **Bulk capture**: Upload CSV → Batch retrieval
- **50+ features**: PDF export, scrolling video (MP4/GIF), HTML extraction
- **Competitive pricing**: $9/month for 1,000 screenshots
- **Generous trial**: 7 days or 100 credits
- **Average response time**: ~9 seconds
**Weaknesses**:
- **Sometimes confusing documentation** at first
- **Rate limits**: 20-80 req/min depending on plan
- **Less modern interface** than CaptureKit
**Pricing**:
- **Trial**: 100 credits or 7 days
- **Basic**: $9/month for 1,000 screenshots
- **Pro**: From $29/month
**Real-world use case**:
David, SEO Manager for an e-commerce site, schedules ScreenshotAPI.net to automatically capture product pages of 50 competitors every Monday morning. He receives a visual report of price and design changes without lifting a finger.
**Verdict**: Excellent choice if you need scheduled captures or bulk processing. The pricing is honest but rate limits can be constraining for aggressive scaling.
## 4. ApiFlash – Speed Above All
**Best For**: Applications requiring ultra-fast response times
ApiFlash is built on AWS Lambda and Chrome, allowing it to achieve impressive response times: less than 1 second for most requests. It’s the fastest screenshot API on the market.
Simplicity is at the product’s core: clear documentation, single endpoint, intuitive parameters. If you just want “it works fast and well,” ApiFlash is for you.
**Strengths**:
- **Exceptional speed**: < 1 second on average
- **Serverless architecture** (AWS Lambda): automatic scaling
- **Ultra-simple documentation** to understand
- **Fair pricing**: $7/month like CaptureKit
- **Up-to-date Chrome engine** for modern rendering
**Weaknesses**:
- **Limited advanced options** compared to ScreenshotOne
- **PDF export** only in Enterprise plan
- **Uptime not publicly displayed**
**Pricing**:
- **Free plan**: 100 screenshots/month
- **Starter**: $7/month
- **Higher plans**: By volume
**Real-world use case**:
Lisa, developer of a social proof app, uses ApiFlash to generate real-time website previews when a visitor hovers over a link. Sub-second speed ensures smooth UX.
**Verdict**: If speed is your #1 priority and you don’t need exotic features, ApiFlash is an excellent choice. But CaptureKit offers more flexibility for the same price.
## 5. Screenshot.fyi – The Accessible Outsider
**Best For**: Developers seeking a simple, straightforward solution
Screenshot.fyi focuses on integration simplicity. The API works with a simple GET request and returns the image directly. No complex configuration, no obscure parameters.
Basic features are well covered: full-page, custom viewports, dark mode, cookie banner removal. Pricing is competitive for small volumes.
**Strengths**:
- **Ultra-simple API**: One endpoint, it works
- **Native dark mode**
- **Cookie banner removal**
- **Device emulation** (mobile, tablet, desktop)
- **No-code integrations** available
**Weaknesses**:
- **Fewer advanced features** than CaptureKit or ScreenshotOne
- **Community and documentation** less developed
- **Performance**: Limited public data
**Pricing**:
- **Free plan**: Limited usage
- **Paid plans**: From a few dollars/month
**Verdict**: Good for getting started quickly but CaptureKit offers a better ecosystem for the same price.
## 6. Screenshotlayer – The Pay-As-You-Go Option
**Best For**: Occasional or highly variable needs
Screenshotlayer has been around for years and offers an interesting **pay-as-you-go** model if your needs fluctuate enormously from month to month.
The API offers advanced customization options (viewport, user-agent, delay, CSS injection) but the interface and documentation show their age.
**Strengths**:
- **Pay-as-you-go**: You only pay for what you consume
- **Pricing flexibility** for irregular needs
- **Advanced customization** options
**Weaknesses**:
- **Aging interface**
- **Less clear documentation**
- **Response time**: ~1 second (decent but not exceptional)
**Pricing**:
- **Free** for small volumes
- **Pay-per-use** thereafter
**Verdict**: Useful for sporadic needs but not optimal for continuous production.
## 7. Site-Shot – Custom Solutions
**Best For**: Enterprises requiring custom work and dedicated support
Site-Shot targets companies with specific needs and budget for custom development. The API offers maximum flexibility but requires more integration effort.
**Strengths**:
- **Deep customization**
- **Enterprise support**
- **Advanced features** (proxies, custom headers, etc.)
**Weaknesses**:
- **Complexity**: Steeper learning curve
- **Non-transparent pricing**
- **Overhead** for standard needs
**Verdict**: Reserved for enterprise projects with very specific needs. For 95% of cases, CaptureKit or ScreenshotOne are more suitable.
## How to Choose the Best Screenshot API for Your Project?
Here’s a quick decision guide based on your profile and constraints:
### Choose CaptureKit if:
- You generate **1,000+ screenshots per month**
- You need to **scale rapidly** without friction
- Your budget is **tight** (startups, SMEs)
- You want to **test free** without a credit card
- Competitors’ **rate limits** frustrate you
- You use **no-code tools** (Zapier, Make, n8n)
### Choose ScreenshotOne if:
- **Visual quality** is critical (client presentations, marketing)
- You have the **budget** ($17/month minimum)
- You want the **best documentation** on the market
- **Rate limits** of 40-150/min meet your needs
- You prefer a **mature product** with track record
### Choose ScreenshotAPI.net if:
- You do **scheduled monitoring** (cron jobs)
- You need **bulk processing** (CSV upload)
- **Mid-range pricing** ($9/month) suits you
- **Scheduled screenshots** save you time
### Choose ApiFlash if:
- **Speed** is your absolute priority (< 1s)
- You need a **simple API** without frills
- You’re comfortable with **AWS Lambda**
- **$7/month pricing** works for you
### Choose Screenshot.fyi, Screenshotlayer, or Site-Shot if:
- Your needs are **very specific**
- You want to **test multiple solutions**
- You have time to **compare in depth**
## Real-World Screenshot API Use Cases in 2026
### 1. Website Monitoring and Archiving
**Persona**: John, Compliance Manager at an online bank
John must prove to the SEC that their website’s legal notices and terms are compliant at each precise date. He uses CaptureKit to automatically capture critical pages every 6 hours and archives them on S3 with timestamps.
**Result**: In case of audit, John can produce timestamped visual proof of any page on any date. Time saved: 15 hours/month.
### 2. Visual Regression Testing (QA)
**Persona**: Rachel, QA Lead at a fintech
With each deployment, Rachel automatically generates screenshots of 200 critical pages via CaptureKit and compares them pixel-by-pixel with the previous version. Any unintended changes are detected before production.
**Result**: 87% of visual bugs caught before production. ROI: Prevents one major regression every 3 months (cost avoided: ~$50K/year).
### 3. Social Sharing Preview Generation
**Persona**: Alex, founder of a link sharing tool
Alex uses ApiFlash to generate real-time visual previews when a user shares a link. Sub-second response time ensures smooth UX.
**Result**: Engagement rate +34% on links shared with visual preview.
### 4. SEO Audit and Competitive Monitoring
**Persona**: Jennifer, SEO Manager at an agency
Jennifer automatically monitors SERPs for 500 keywords across 30 clients. CaptureKit captures Google result pages weekly and visually detects position changes.
**Result**: Early detection of Google penalties, reactivity +70%.
### 5. Automated Technical Documentation
**Persona**: Brian, Technical Writer at a SaaS company
Brian automatically generates product documentation screenshots at each release. No need to manually redo 200 captures with every UI update.
**Result**: Saves 12 hours per release (1 release/month = 144h/year = ~$6,000 saved).
## Screenshot API vs In-House Solutions: What’s the Real Cost?
Many technical teams consider coding their own solution with Puppeteer or Playwright. Let’s analyze the true cost:
### In-House Solution (Puppeteer/Playwright)
**Visible costs**:
- Dedicated server or VM: $50-200/month depending on load
- Initial dev time: 2-5 days ($1,500-3,500)
- Monthly maintenance: 5-10h/month ($500-1,000/month)
**Hidden costs**:
- Managing crashes and timeouts
- Updating Chrome/Chromium
- Managing cookie banners (fragile code)
- Scaling (cluster orchestration)
- Monitoring and alerts
- Debugging edge cases
**Estimated annual total**: $8,000-15,000
### Screenshot API (CaptureKit)
**Costs**:
- Growth plan 10K screenshots: $49/month
- Zero maintenance
- Automatic scaling
- Support included
**Annual total**: $588
**Verdict**: Unless you’re generating 100K+ screenshots/month with ultra-specific needs, a screenshot API is 10-25× more cost-effective than an in-house solution.
## Common Mistakes to Avoid with Screenshot APIs
### Mistake 1: Not enabling cookie and ad blocking
**Impact**: 40% of your captures are polluted by GDPR popups.
**Solution**: Always enable `remove_cookie_banners=true` and `remove_ads=true`. CaptureKit and ScreenshotOne excel in this area.
### Mistake 2: Not testing in real conditions before scaling
**Impact**: You discover too late that the API can’t render your page type (JavaScript heavy, auth required, etc.).
**Solution**: Use CaptureKit’s 100 free credits to test your complete workflow before paying.
### Mistake 3: Ignoring rate limits
**Impact**: Your script crashes or slows dramatically when trying to capture 500 URLs at once.
**Solution**: Choose CaptureKit (no strict rate limit) or implement intelligent throttling.
### Mistake 4: Storing images anywhere
**Impact**: Unnecessarily consumed bandwidth, display latency.
**Solution**: Use CaptureKit’s integrated S3 storage (`s3_url=true`) to directly host your captures on an optimized CDN.
### Mistake 5: Not handling timeouts and errors
**Impact**: Your workflow fails silently or loops indefinitely.
**Solution**: Implement retry logic with exponential backoff and log all failures for debugging.
## Integrating a Screenshot API Without Coding (No-Code)
If you’re not a developer, modern screenshot APIs integrate seamlessly into your no-code workflows via **Zapier**, **Make** (formerly Integromat), and **n8n**.
### Example: Automated Landing Page Audit (Zapier + CaptureKit)
**Workflow**:
1. Trigger: New row in Google Sheets (list of URLs to audit)
2. Action: CaptureKit Screenshot API (full-page capture)
3. Action: Upload to Google Drive in “Audits YYYY-MM” folder
4. Action: Send Slack notification with preview
**Setup time**: 15 minutes
**Savings vs manual**: 5h/week
CaptureKit provides [detailed tutorials](https://www.capturekit.dev/blog/automate-website-screenshots-using-n8n-and-capturekit-website-capture-api) for Zapier, Make, and n8n.
## Legal Aspects: Can You Screenshot Any Website?
**Common question**: “Is it legal to automatically capture third-party sites?”
**Short answer**: Yes, in the vast majority of cases, provided you follow certain rules.
### What’s generally allowed:
- Capturing **public pages** for documentation, archiving, monitoring
- Generating **previews** for social sharing (fair use)
- Doing **competitive intelligence** (public analysis)
- **Auditing** your own sites or client sites (with agreement)
### What’s prohibited:
- Capturing **login-protected pages** without authorization
- Massively republishing third-party content without context (copyright violation)
- Circumventing **technical protection measures**
- Using captures for **identity theft**
### Recommendations:
- Read the target site’s **Terms of Service** if high volume
- Respect **robots.txt** (even if not legally binding)
- In Europe, watch out for **GDPR** if captures contain visible personal data
- In case of commercial doubt, consult a specialized IP/tech lawyer
**Note**: CaptureKit and other APIs don’t automatically verify the legality of your requests. The responsibility lies with you.
## 2026 Outlook: The Future of Screenshot APIs
### Trend 1: AI-powered optimization
Screenshot APIs are starting to integrate AI to automatically detect the “best moment” to capture (lazy-loading complete, animations finished, critical content loaded).
CaptureKit is already experimenting with ML to dynamically optimize the `wait_until` parameter based on page type.
### Trend 2: Native video recording
ScreenshotOne already offers video recording of interactions. In 2026, this feature will democratize for documenting complete workflows (login → action → result).
### Trend 3: Integrated accessibility testing
Screenshot APIs will integrate automatic accessibility reports (contrast, missing alt text, HTML structure) directly in the response.
### Trend 4: Edge computing
To further reduce latency, APIs will migrate to Cloudflare Workers and AWS Lambda@Edge. Goal: < 500ms global response time.
## Key Takeaways
- **CaptureKit** dominates the 2026 market with the best value for money and zero strict rate limits
- **ScreenshotOne** remains the premium choice for exceptional visual quality but costs 2.4× more
- **ApiFlash** excels in pure speed (< 1s) for real-time applications
- **ScreenshotAPI.net** is ideal for scheduled workflows and bulk processing
- A screenshot API costs 10-25× less than an in-house Puppeteer solution
- Always enable cookie and ad blocking for clean captures
- Test with free credits before scaling to production
[Related article
Database Enrichment: Complete Guide
Discover how to automatically enrich your contacts with emails, phones, and company data.](https://derrick-app.com/en/database-enrichment/?utm_source=website&utm_medium=cta&utm_campaign=secondary_cta&utm_content=related_article)
## Conclusion: Which Screenshot API to Choose in 2026?
If we had to recommend a single screenshot API for 80% of use cases, it would be **CaptureKit** without hesitation.
**Why?**
- **Unbeatable price**: $7/month vs $17 at ScreenshotOne
- **Frictionless scaling**: No rate limit blocking your workflows
- **100 free credits** to test risk-free
- **Complete features**: Cookie removal, S3 storage, proxy, device emulation
- **Native no-code integrations**
- **Responsive support** and clear documentation
**The remaining 20%?**
- If pixel-perfect visual quality is critical → **ScreenshotOne**
- If you need sub-second speed → **ApiFlash**
- If your needs are primarily bulk/scheduled → **ScreenshotAPI.net**
Our advice: **Start with CaptureKit** (100 free credits, no CC). Test your real workflow. If quality isn’t sufficient (rare), migrate to ScreenshotOne. In 95% of cases, you’ll stay with CaptureKit and save thousands of dollars.
Need to Enrich Your Monitoring Data?
Tracking competitor websites? Derrick automatically enriches your lists with emails, phone numbers, and company data in Google Sheets.
[Try for free →](https://derrick-app.com?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=cta?utm_source=blog&utm_medium=cta&utm_campaign=primary_cta)
## FAQ
### What is the cheapest screenshot API in 2026?
CaptureKit and ApiFlash both start at $7 per month for 1,000 screenshots, making them the most affordable options. However, CaptureKit offers better value for money as it doesn’t impose strict rate limits and includes 100 free credits without requiring a credit card.
### Can you use a screenshot API without coding?
Yes, modern screenshot APIs like CaptureKit integrate natively with Zapier, Make, and n8n. You can automate your screenshots via visual workflows without writing a single line of code. Comprehensive tutorials are available for each platform.
### How long does it take to generate a screenshot?
Time varies by API and page complexity. ApiFlash is fastest at less than 1 second on average. CaptureKit and ScreenshotOne run around 7 seconds. ScreenshotAPI.net requires about 9 seconds. These times include complete page loading and image processing.
### Do screenshot APIs work with login-protected sites?
Yes, most screenshot APIs support authentication via cookies or custom headers. You can pass your session tokens to capture protected pages. However, ensure you have legal authorization to capture this private content.
### How to automatically handle GDPR cookie banners?
CaptureKit and ScreenshotOne integrate automatic cookie banner blocking systems. CaptureKit uses the remove_cookie_banners=true parameter while ScreenshotOne relies on a database of 50,000 heuristic rules. Average success rate: 90-95% of banners blocked without intervention.
### Can you capture an entire page (full-page) or just the viewport?
All modern screenshot APIs support both modes. The full_page=true parameter captures the entire page by automatically scrolling. Viewport mode captures only the visible area without scrolling. Full-page capture typically takes 2-3 seconds longer.
### Are screenshot APIs GDPR compliant?
Screenshot APIs themselves are GDPR-neutral. It’s your use that must be compliant. If you capture pages containing visible personal data, you must have a legal basis (legitimate interest, consent, etc.). Public captures for monitoring or documentation purposes generally fall under legitimate interest.
### What’s the difference between a screenshot API and Puppeteer?
Puppeteer is a library you host and maintain yourself. A screenshot API is a turnkey service that manages the infrastructure for you. The screenshot API costs less than Puppeteer as soon as you count your dev and maintenance time. Only very high volumes (100K+ screenshots/month) justify in-house Puppeteer.