# Apollo Vs Clay : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo excels at outbound sequencing and large database access, Clay shines with waterfall enrichment and creative workflows, while Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with native formulas and rollover credits starting at €9 per month. Apollo suits teams needing CRM integration and call automation, Clay fits technical users building multi-source enrichment chains, and Derrick serves spreadsheet-first teams wanting simple enrichment without platform lock-in or monthly credit waste.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-clay-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs Clay  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Clay vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab1c954f9354a90fa50b1_694536c8316a15f163e463a3_image_1766143687906.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Clay

### Real-time enrichment without data quality compromises

Real-time enrichment often sacrifices data quality, a pitfall highlighted by Apollo and Clay’s real-time claims that still struggle with accuracy and consistency across niche segments. Derrick does real-time enrichment differently by leveraging 100% native Google Sheets workflows and automated validation across 50+ attributes, reducing manual verification. Users can expect immediate, high-confidence enrichments without compromising quality, supported by real-time email validation and AI-driven scoring to keep data pristine. A practical use case: onboarded teams cut blast-time meetings by 20% while maintaining 98% data accuracy in targeted lists.

### Flexible 3000+ integrations for scalable automation

Apollo and Clay both struggle with flexible, large-scale integrations when automating across disparate tools. Derrick unlocks 3000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, delivering scalable automation without bespoke setups. With Derrick, teams gain true breadth and seamless workflow deployment, cutting manual integration work by up to 40% and shortening time-to-value. A typical use case: deploy multi-source prospecting sequences in minutes, not days, while preserving data consistency across apps.

### No-code setup for rapid value with AI-driven scoring

No-code setup for rapid value with AI-driven scoring highlights how Apollo and Clay often require complex configurations or multiple tools to achieve similar outcomes. Derrick provides a fully no-code environment in Google Sheets, with built-in AI scoring from Claude and ChatGPT that auto-segments and summarizes without hand-tuned pipelines. This translates to faster value realization, saving 5-10h per month on setup and iteration, and delivering actionable scores within minutes rather than days. A quick use-case: auto-score new leads and enqueue personalized outreach in a single sheet, with credits remaining rollable month-to-month for flexibility.

## apollo vs Clay vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Clay](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-clay-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### How does Derrick compare to Apollo for data enrichment?

Derrick approaches data enrichment differently than Apollo by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports and saving teams five to ten hours monthly. While Apollo excels at large contact databases and verification speed, Derrick combines real-time email validation with integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT for automatic segmentation and insights. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than Apollo's rigid pricing structure, making it ideal for teams prioritizing streamlined workflows and cost efficiency over sheer database scale.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Clay for automation?

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Clay depends on your workflow priorities. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets with no CSV exports or complex setup, saving teams five to ten hours monthly compared to Clay's more involved configuration process. Derrick includes integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. Clay excels at multi-source data aggregation and workflow automation, but requires more technical setup. For teams prioritizing simplicity, native spreadsheet integration, and cost efficiency, Derrick delivers a more streamlined enrichment experience. For those needing advanced workflow automation across multiple platforms, Clay may be more suitable depending on your specific outreach requirements.

### Which is the better pricing, Derrick or Apollo?

Derrick offers more flexible and transparent pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, eliminating waste from unused allocations. Apollo operates on higher-tier subscription models with premium database access, while Clay charges based on enrichment volume. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, making it ideal for testing. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick's Small plan at nine dollars monthly provides better value than Apollo's enterprise-focused pricing, while offering native Google Sheets integration without costly external platform fees or LinkedIn Navigator subscriptions.

### Derrick vs Apollo vs Clay: what's the difference?

Derrick differs from Apollo and Clay by being 100% native to Google Sheets, turning Sheets into a complete prospecting hub without CSV exports or complex setup. Derrick emphasizes native AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries with integrated Claude and ChatGPT, plus 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, which streamlines workflows directly in Sheets. While Apollo offers a vast B2B contact database and strong outbound automation, and Clay focuses on real-time data enrichment and automated outreach, Derrick shines in simplicity, speed, and cost efficiency for teams that want a plug‑and‑play, sheet‑first approach with credit rollovers and a free tier, making it especially appealing for fast, lightweight prospecting without leaving Sheets.

### Does Apollo replace Clay for outreach and enrichment?

Apollo and Clay serve different purposes but can complement each other rather than replace one another. Apollo excels at contact database access and email verification at scale, while Clay specializes in real-time data enrichment and workflow automation. However, neither platform offers the Google Sheets-native simplicity that Derrick provides. Derrick eliminates the need for external platforms entirely, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes directly within your spreadsheet without CSV exports or complex setup. With rollover credits, integrated AI scoring, and real-time email validation, Derrick streamlines the entire enrichment and outreach process while keeping your data workflow unified and efficient.

### What are Derrick's pricing and features vs Clay?

Derrick differs from Clay mainly in its native Google Sheets ecosystem, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and a generous, credit-based pricing model with rollover and a free tier—all without requiring a credit card. Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company and integrates 3000+ apps via Zapier, Make, or n8n, plus optional Claude or ChatGPT for automation. Clay focuses on real-time data enrichment across multiple sources with a strong workflow builder and native CRM integrations, but Derrick tends to offer a simpler setup, cost flexibility (monthly credit rollover), no-CB on free tier, and deep Sheets-native prospecting capabilities that can reduce setup time and ongoing overhead compared to Clay. When comparing to Apollo, Derrick lacks the same expansive database breadth but compensates with native Sheets usability, cheaper entry, and more autonomous automation, whereas Apollo emphasizes broad data scope and outbound workflows that Derrick complements rather than duplicates. Overall, Derrick positions itself as a fast, cost-flexible, AI-assisted enrichment and outreach solution tightly integrated with Google Sheets, while Clay emphasizes multi-source enrichment and visual workflows, and Apollo centers on large-scale data and outreach orchestration.