# Apollo Vs Dux-Soup : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo offers a comprehensive B2B database with verified contact information and email sequences, suited for teams needing scale and CRM integration. Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn prospecting and messaging directly from the platform, ideal for users focused on social selling workflows. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets at €9 per month with real-time email validation, AI-powered lead scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and 50+ enrichment attributes without database uploads, making it efficient for teams wanting native spreadsheet workflows with credit rollover and no setup friction.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-dux-soup-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs Dux-Soup  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Dux-Soup vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab33af579164a68ce2341_6945362ee4bbe42f75997b1d_image_1766143534444.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Dux-Soup

### Real-time validation without data gaps in enrichment

Derrick delivers real-time validation during enrichment, a capability that Apollo and Dux-Soup struggle to consistently guarantee across records. Unlike Apollo, which emphasizes scale and verified emails but can suffer from incomplete enrichment, and Dux-Soup, which relies on LinkedIn data with limited real-time validation, Derrick ensures immediate checks as data is added. This results in fewer data gaps, higher deliverability, and faster campaign readiness, cutting validation time by up to 40% for teams using 100+ records per session. A practical use case is live email validation during import, preventing bounce-prone leads from entering sequences.

### No upfront data-entry required for setup efficiency

Derrick eliminates the need for upfront data-entry by turning Google Sheets into a 100% native, self-contained enrichment hub, unlike Apollo or Dux-Soup which rely on separate databases or LinkedIn-centric data. Apollo can require manual data handling and enrichment gaps, while Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn automation with limited external validation. Derrick auto-populates and enriches records within Sheets, saving 5-10 hours per user each month and delivering up to 50+ attributes per contact without onboarding frictions. No extra CSV exports or complex configurations are required—just plug in and start scaling prospecting efficiently.

### AI-driven lead scoring for deeper qualification insights

Apollo and Dux-Soup often offer basic scoring or engagement signals, but their capabilities remain shallow for deep qualification due to data gaps and LinkedIn-centric limitations. Derrick differentiates itself with AI-powered lead scoring that combines Claude and ChatGPT-driven insights for richer segmentation and automatic summarization across 50+ enrichment attributes. This yields measurable accuracy gains, with teams reporting up to a 25% increase in qualified leads and faster prioritization, since scores reflect broader firmographic, technographic, and behavioral signals. A practical use case is auto-scoring new leads as they enter Sheets, enabling instant routing to the right SDRs.

## apollo vs Dux-Soup vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 11.25$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and apollo?

Derrick is a Google Sheets-native data enrichment platform designed for seamless prospecting without technical setup, while Apollo is a comprehensive B2B sales intelligence platform offering a massive contact database of 250 million profiles with multi-channel outreach capabilities. Apollo excels at scale and database breadth, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting teams. However, Derrick differentiates through native Sheets integration, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations, plus built-in AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick also features rollover credits and requires no credit card for the free tier, offering more cost-effective flexibility for teams prioritizing enrichment depth and workflow efficiency within their existing tools.

### Is Derrick a good alternative to Dux-Soup?

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Dux-Soup, especially if you want to move beyond LinkedIn-only automation. While Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn outreach automation, it lacks comprehensive data enrichment and relies heavily on LinkedIn's API restrictions. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms and CSV exports, and provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation. Additionally, Derrick integrates AI capabilities using Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent lead scoring and segmentation, while Dux-Soup focuses narrowly on LinkedIn automation. If you need a complete prospecting solution with flexible credit rollover and no card required for the free tier, Derrick offers significantly more versatility and data depth than Dux-Soup's automation-focused approach.

### Derrick vs apollo vs Dux-Soup: which is best overall?

The best choice depends on your specific needs. Apollo excels at large-scale contact databases with verified email accuracy, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting teams. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation, perfect for recruiters and sales professionals focused exclusively on LinkedIn outreach. Derrick stands out for teams already working in Google Sheets, offering native integration without CSV exports, AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits at lower price points. Choose Apollo for database breadth, Dux-Soup for LinkedIn automation, or Derrick for seamless spreadsheet-based prospecting with built-in intelligence and cost efficiency.

### Which is better for pricing: Derrick or apollo?

For pricing, Derrick often presents a more cost-efficient option for teams already using Google Sheets, especially since it eliminates CSV exports and LinkedIn dependencies while offering monthly rollovers and a free tier with 200 credits. Apollo, by contrast, bundles heavy data capabilities and multi-channel outreach, which can come with higher ongoing costs for features and data refreshes. If your priority is a predictable, scalable budget with native enrichment and workflow within Sheets, Derrick tends to be the better value; if you need expansive contact databases and outbound automation at scale and are prepared for potentially higher spend, Apollo may fit.

### Does Derrick offer better review scores than Dux-Soup?

Derrick and Dux-Soup operate in different spaces, making direct review score comparisons challenging. Dux-Soup specializes exclusively in LinkedIn automation with strong user satisfaction for that specific use case, while Derrick focuses on comprehensive B2B data enrichment natively within Google Sheets. Derrick users consistently report higher satisfaction with data quality, enrichment depth, and real-time email validation capabilities. Additionally, Derrick's integrated AI features, rollover credits, and zero credit card requirement for the free tier deliver measurably better value for teams seeking complete prospect management without LinkedIn dependency or complex external workflows.

### Can Derrick replace both apollo and Dux-Soup for my team?

Yes, Derrick can replace some core functions of both Apollo and Dux-Soup, but not necessarily every feature out of the box. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets data enrichment platform with real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and vast integration options via Zapier/Make/n8n—without CSV exports or LinkedIn dependencies. This makes it a strong alternative to Apollo for fast, scalable prospecting data enrichment and workflow automation, and it can cover many LinkedIn-driven outreach needs typically served by Dux-Soup when you’re aiming for a broader, multi-source enrichment and automated scoring within a single, centralized sheet-based system. However, Apollo’s large database and multi-channel outreach strengths may still complement Derrick for teams that require extensive contact networks and sophisticated enrichment depth, while Dux-Soup’s LinkedIn-centric automation remains a fit for highly LinkedIn-focused campaigns. In short, Derrick can replace or reduce reliance on both, particularly for data enrichment, validation, and integrated prospect management, while offering a lighter risk profile and no credit card requirement on the free tier.