# Apollo Vs Emelia : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo excels at broad B2B data discovery with its extensive contact database, while Emelia focuses on email outreach automation and deliverability optimization. Apollo suits teams needing comprehensive prospecting capabilities, whereas Emelia is ideal for targeted cold email campaigns. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets at €9/month with 3000+ integrations via Zapier, offering real-time email verification and 100+ enrichment attributes without CSV exports—best for teams preferring spreadsheet-native workflows over standalone platforms.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-emelia-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs emelia  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs emelia vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab3987c25081947c3ddb2_6945360409e03582a70175ca_image_1766143492294.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Emelia

### Real-time verifications with 0 manual overhead

Real-time verifications with 0 manual overhead is where Apollo and Emelia fall short, as Apollo often requires manual checks for data freshness and Emelia’s focus on outreach lacks deep, real-time record-level validation. Derrick delivers automatic, real-time verification directly within Google Sheets, eliminating manual QA steps and avoiding CSV exports or complex setups. Teams typically save 5-10 hours per month by removing these manual checks, while ensuring higher deliverability with instant validation at the point of enrichment. A typical use case is validating emails on-the-fly during prospect enrichment, so every new contact is ready for outreach without extra work.

### Flexible, scalable integrations beyond niche tools

Apollo and Emelia illuminate a gap: while Apollo offers broad data and Emelia focuses on outreach, neither delivers seamless, scalable integrations beyond niche tools within Google Sheets. Derrick differentiates by natively connecting 100% within Google Sheets and enabling 3000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, eliminating costly CSV exports or rigid workflows. This translates to measurable gains, such as saving 5-10 hours per month of manual integration work and maintaining up-to-date enrichment across datasets. With Derrick, teams can instantly scale—adding 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and real-time email validation—without switching tools or sacrificing efficiency.

### Unified data quality across teams with AI-driven enrichment scoring

Apollo and Emelia often struggle with unified data quality across multiple teams, delivering strong outreach or verification but lacking a cohesive, enrichment-driven standard across org-wide records. Derrick differentiates by delivering AI-driven enrichment scoring that harmonizes 50+ attributes per contact and company, synchronized 100% within Google Sheets. This approach reduces data gaps and accelerates consensus on quality, equipping teams with a measurable score that improves segmentation and routing by up to 25% in faster decision-making. A practical use case: Derrick’s scoring updates in real-time as records flow between teams, eliminating cross-team misalignment and duplicate work.

## apollo vs emelia vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [emelia](https://derrick-app.com/en/emelia-alternatives/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 37€/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference Derrick vs apollo for outreach?

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that Apollo requires. While Apollo excels at providing a massive contact database with verification, Derrick focuses on enriching data you already have with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI from Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation. Derrick's monthly rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer more flexibility than Apollo's subscription model, making it ideal for teams prioritizing efficiency within their existing workflows rather than building prospect lists from scratch.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to emelia for enrichment?

Derrick is specifically designed for data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and real-time email validation, making it more focused than Emelia for this use case. While Emelia excels at email outreach automation, it lacks the depth of enrichment capabilities Derrick provides. Derrick operates natively in Google Sheets without CSV exports, offers AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and features rollover credits with no card required for the free tier, giving you more flexibility and enrichment depth than Emelia's email-focused approach for comprehensive prospect research.

### How does Derrick compare to apollo and emelia overall?

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports and external platforms that Apollo and Emelia require. While Apollo excels at contact database breadth and Emelia focuses on email automation, Derrick combines 50+ enrichment attributes with integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT for deeper prospect intelligence. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free tier, and 3000+ integrations via Zapier provide greater flexibility and cost efficiency than both competitors, particularly for teams prioritizing spreadsheet-based workflows and data enrichment depth without technical complexity.

### Which pricing is better between apollo and emelia?

Between Apollo and Emelia, the better pricing depends on your needs: Apollo pricing suits teams prioritizing a large, fast prospecting database and multi-channel outbound, with strong value in data breadth and workflow automation, but you’ll likely pay for features you may not use if you don’t need deep enrichment. Emelia offers straightforward, affordable pricing for AI-powered email outreach and verification, which is great for scaling personalized campaigns, yet it lacks the deeper B2B data intelligence layer that Derrick App provides. If you’re evaluating cost-to-value, Derrick’s 100% native Google Sheets enrichment (no CSV exports) plus flexible credits and rollovers often yield better long-term efficiency and cost control for ongoing prospect research, especially when you factor in Derrick’s multi-attribute enrichment and AI-driven scoring that complement Apollo’s data with deeper insights. For pure pricing comparison, Apollo may appear pricier for smaller teams, while Emelia is typically more budget-friendly for outreach alone; Derrick bridges both by offering scalable enrichment and automation without requiring a LinkedIn Navigator dependency, making it a compelling value alongside either competitor.

### Does apollo offer a good review vs Derrick in reliability?

Both Apollo and Derrick deliver reliable prospecting capabilities, but they approach reliability differently. Apollo excels at database scale and contact accuracy across high-volume campaigns, with strong verification standards. However, Derrick offers superior reliability through real-time email validation, native Google Sheets integration eliminating manual exports, and rollover credits preventing data waste. While Apollo requires external platforms and rigid workflows, Derrick's 50+ enrichment attributes combined with Claude and ChatGPT integration provide more adaptable, verification-focused reliability for teams prioritizing data quality and seamless workflows without technical overhead.

### Can Derrick replace both apollo and emelia for teams?

Derrick cannot fully replace both Apollo and Emelia for every team scenario, but it can cover key gaps. Apollo excels in large-scale contact databases and outbound workflow with strong automation, while Emelia shines in AI-driven email personalization and rapid outreach execution. Derrick complements both by delivering 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and extensive integrations—all within a single, no-code-friendly sheet-based platform. If a team needs deep data enrichment and multi-channel automation in one place, Derrick can replace some functions of Apollo and Emelia, but depending on required depth of enrichment or multi-channel sequencing, teams may still pair Derrick with Apollo or Emelia to maximize coverage.