# Apollo Vs Evaboot : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo excels at broad contact discovery with its large database and outreach sequences, while Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator scraping and email verification with a pay-per-export model. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with real-time AI enrichment across 50-plus attributes, 3000-plus integrations, and monthly credit rollover starting at €9, making it ideal for teams prioritizing no-code automation and flexible data workflows without platform switching.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-evaboot-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs Evaboot  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Evaboot vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2a4e709d86c1003d478_694535f177ec05289bf3e181_image_1766143472503.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Evaboot

### Real-time validation without manual overhead

Derrick delivers real-time validation directly within your 100% native Google Sheets workflow, a capability Apollo and Evaboot cannot guarantee in real time across your enrichment processes. Unlike Apollo, which emphasizes data access and verification but may require manual checks to ensure freshness, Derrick automates ongoing validation as you work. With Derrick, you gain immediate error detection and corrected data at the point of use, reducing manual overhead and saving hours monthly. For quick wins, you can verify emails and enrich 50+ attributes on the fly, without leaving Sheets.

### Flexible, no-code automation for complex workflows

Derrick enables flexible, no-code automation that can handle complex workflows beyond the straightforward tasks Evaboot supports and without the data-structure constraints Apollo often encounters. Unlike Apollo’s focus on data breadth and Evaboot’s emphasis on basic validation, Derrick combines AI-driven scoring, seamless Google Sheets-native automation, and 3,000+ integrations to orchestrate multi-step processes without coding. Teams typically realize a 20–40% faster workflow completion and reclaim 5–10 hours per month previously spent on manual setup. A practical use case is automating prospect qualification across multiple data sources with real-time updates and configurable rules.

### Scalable, AI-powered enrichment for complex data gaps

Derrick tackles the AI-powered enrichment of complex data gaps that Apollo and Evaboot struggle to fill at scale, especially when records are fragmented across sources. Unlike Apollo’s focus on breadth with mixed enrichment or Evaboot’s basic validation, Derrick delivers scalable AI-driven profiling and segmentation right inside Google Sheets. By combining Claude and ChatGPT for automatic scoring, summarization, and 50+ enrichment attributes, Derrick delivers richer, more actionable records, reducing manual follow-up by up to 40-60% in complex datasets. With 3000+ integrations and reportable monthly credits, teams can continuously enrich and validate large stacks of data without exporting or retooling.

## apollo vs Evaboot vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 39$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Is Derrick better than Apollo for data enrichment and automation?

Derrick excels in data enrichment automation with a 100% native Google Sheets experience, eliminating the CSV export friction Apollo requires. While Apollo offers a larger contact database, Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per record with real-time email validation and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for free tier provide better flexibility than Apollo's rigid pricing. For automation efficiency and ease of use, Derrick streamlines workflows directly within Google Sheets, whereas Apollo demands external platform management and steeper setup complexity.

### Can Derrick replace Evaboot for basic workflows?

Yes, Derrick can effectively replace Evaboot for basic workflows. Both platforms handle lead qualification and data enrichment, but Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports, saving significant time. Derrick includes integrated AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation, whereas Evaboot relies on predefined data sources with limited customization. Additionally, Derrick's monthly rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility than Evaboot's scaling costs, making it a more accessible choice for teams seeking straightforward enrichment without complexity.

### What’s the Derrick vs Apollo vs Evaboot comparison for features?

Derrick operates as a 100% native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex setup unlike Apollo's external database approach or Evaboot's no-code platform. Derrick enriches contacts with 50+ attributes and includes integrated AI powered by Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. While Apollo excels at large-scale contact databases and Evaboot focuses on lead qualification, Derrick's rollover credits, real-time email validation, and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility and cost efficiency for teams prioritizing seamless workflow integration and data enrichment within their existing spreadsheet infrastructure.

### How does Apollo compare pricing to Derrick App?

Apollo pricing is generally positioned for teams that want a high-volume prospecting database with built-in email verification and multi-channel outreach, often at a higher upfront value and ongoing cost as you scale. Derrick App, by contrast, offers a more lightweight, Google Sheets-native approach with a transparent, tiered credits model (Free 200 credits; Small 4000; Medium 10000; Large 25000; XL 100000) and no credit card required for the free tier. Derrick emphasizes credit rollovers, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, all within a 100% native Google Sheets workflow. For teams balancing cost, ease-of-use, and tight Google Sheets integration, Derrick can be more cost-predictable and friction-free than Apollo, while Apollo may still win on sheer data breadth and outbound automation at scale. Evaboot sits in a similar no-code/automation space, but Derrick uniquely combines native Sheets enrichment with AI scoring and extensive integrations, potentially reducing total cost of ownership for ongoing enrichment and prospecting.

### Which is the better reviews pick: Derrick or Evaboot?

Derrick and Evaboot serve different enrichment needs, but Derrick edges ahead for most teams. Evaboot excels at lead scoring and qualification within CRM systems, making it solid for straightforward workflows. However, Derrick offers superior flexibility with fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact, native Google Sheets integration eliminating CSV exports, real-time email validation for better deliverability, and built-in AI powered by Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and free tier without requiring a credit card provide more budget control than Evaboot's unpredictable scaling costs, especially for growing organizations handling variable data volumes.

### What are Derrick’s main differences versus Apollo and Evaboot?

Derrick differentiates from Apollo and Evaboot by being 100% native in Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup, while enabling a full prospection center directly inside Sheets. It adds built-in AI with Claude and ChatGPT for automatic scoring, segmentation, and summaries, plus real-time email validation to boost deliverability. Derrick also offers flexible, credit-based pricing with rollovers and no credit card required for the free tier, plus 3000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. In contrast, Apollo emphasizes a large contact database and outbound automation, while Evaboot focuses on easy lead scoring and data quality with lighter enrichment needs. Derrick thus blends native workflow, AI-driven insights, and flexible access, making it particularly appealing for data-rich, fast-moving B2B prospecting teams in Sheets.