# Apollo Vs Hunter : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo offers a multi-channel B2B database with email finder, phone numbers, and built-in sequences, best for teams needing an all-in-one sales platform but requiring separate verification steps. Hunter specializes in fast email discovery and domain search, ideal for lightweight prospecting yet limited in enrichment depth. Derrick runs entirely inside Google Sheets at €9 per month, delivering real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact without CSV exports, suited for teams who live in Sheets and want instant, verified data.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-hunter-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs hunter  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs hunter vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2d35df52e30d16f2025_6945356c77ec05289bf3c0a5_image_1766143339167.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Hunter

### Real-time validation, zero manual verification with Derrick

Real-time validation and zero manual verification highlight a key gap with Apollo and Hunter, which rely on separate verification steps or limited enrichment that still require spot checks. Derrick delivers real-time email validation directly within Google Sheets, eliminating manual cross-checks and ensuring deliverability as you prospect. Teams save up to 5-10 hours per month and reduce bounce risk, thanks to instantaneous verification across 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. Use cases like immediate campaign launches and accurate outreach lists become possible, without leaving Derrick’s native Sheets environment.

### Unified data model with 3000+ integrations for seamless enrichment

Apollo and Hunter typically require stitching together multiple sources to achieve richer profiles, often leaving gaps in unified context and slow enrichment. Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets experience with a unified data model and 3000+ integrations, consolidating disparate signals in one place. This eliminates data silos, saving time and reducing manual merging, with measurable gains like up to 20-30% faster enrichment cycles and consistent 50+ attribute coverage per contact. Use cases include rapid, end-to-end prospect profiling directly inside Sheets without leaving the workspace.

### Effortless Setup for Immediate Prospecting Wins

Apollo and Hunter both constrain setup speed: Apollo’s multi-tool approach can slow onboarding with data layering, while Hunter focuses on email discovery rather than richer prospect context. Derrick delivers effortless, 100% native Google Sheets setup with real-time validation and enrichment without CSV exports or complex configs. This means teams can start prospecting immediately, saving 5-10 hours per month and reducing initial ramp time by up to 40%. A quick use-case: plug Derrick into Sheets, validate emails in real-time, and launch targeted outreach in minutes.

## apollo vs hunter vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [hunter](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-hunter-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs apollo difference for data enrichment?

Derrick approaches data enrichment natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex external platforms like Apollo requires. While Apollo excels at database breadth with 250 million contacts, Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per record with real-time email validation and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Hunter focuses primarily on email discovery, whereas Derrick provides comprehensive firmographic enrichment directly in your spreadsheet. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than both competitors for teams managing variable prospecting volumes.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to apollo for SMBs?

For SMBs, Derrick offers distinct advantages over Apollo. While Apollo excels at large contact databases, it requires significant investment and external platform management. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex CSV workflows and saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick's rollover credits, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and free tier requiring no credit card make it more cost-effective for resource-constrained teams. Apollo suits high-volume enterprises, but Derrick's simplicity and affordability better align with SMB budgets and technical capabilities.

### Derrick vs apollo vs hunter: which offers better pricing?

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing model with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, starting at just nine dollars for four thousand credits with no credit card required for the free tier. Apollo and Hunter both operate on standard subscription models without rollover benefits. Derrick's pricing becomes significantly more cost-effective for teams with variable prospecting needs, especially when combined with its native Google Sheets integration that eliminates expensive third-party tools and subscriptions like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, potentially saving organizations over twelve hundred dollars annually compared to competing platforms.

### How do apollo and hunter compare for outreach and data?

Apollo and Hunter both target outreach, but they approach data from different angles. Apollo is a broad B2B prospecting platform with a large, active database, email finding, verification, and multi-channel outreach, which makes it strong for high-volume prospecting but can struggle with granular data enrichment and niche industry accuracy. Hunter excels at precise email discovery and verification with a clean, fast experience, but it offers limited company intelligence beyond basic profiles and weaker multi-channel outreach capabilities. Derrick complements both by delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation natively within Google Sheets, plus extensive automation via 3000+ integrations. If you need scale with integrated workflows, Apollo may be better; if you need fast, accurate emails with a simple enrichment layer, Hunter fits; Derrick adds deeper enrichment and native automation without exporting data, making it a strong all-in-one augmentation for outreach.

### Which is a better review pick: Derrick or hunter?

Both Derrick and Hunter serve different prospecting needs. Hunter excels as a specialized email finder with strong verification accuracy and simplicity, making it ideal if email discovery is your primary focus. However, Derrick offers broader enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and operates natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports or complex setup. For teams needing comprehensive prospect research beyond just email addresses, Derrick delivers more strategic value with greater flexibility and lower overhead costs.

### Can Derrick replace apollo and hunter in one stack?

Derrick cannot fully replace Apollo and Hunter in a single stack if your goal is to mirror every capability of a full B2B sales intelligence platform. Apollo provides a massive, validated contact database, multi-channel outreach, and deep analytics, while Hunter specializes in highly accurate email discovery and verification. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and automation layer with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and seamless integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, plus credits that roll over and no credit card required for the free tier. In practice, Derrick complements these tools—you can layer Derrick’s enrichment, scoring, and automation on top of Apollo’s data or Hunter’s email discovery to streamline workflows. If you need pure all-in-one coverage (data depth, enrichment, multi-channel outreach) in one stack, you’d likely still benefit from pairing Derrick with Apollo or Hunter rather than relying on Derrick alone.