# Apollo Vs Lemlist : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo excels at large-scale prospecting with intent signals and broad integrations, Lemlist specializes in multichannel outreach with video and LinkedIn automation, while Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with real-time email verification and 50+ enrichment attributes starting at €9 per month. Choose Apollo for enterprise sales intelligence, Lemlist for personalized cold campaigns, or Derrick when you need verified data without leaving Sheets and want credit rollover between months.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-lemlist-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs Lemlist  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Lemlist vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab33ae7a1e801f5649e25_694534eaea8136e06e39ec97_image_1766143210317.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Lemlist

### Verified data without manual validation overhead

Apollo and Lemlist often rely on data sources that require manual validation to ensure accuracy, leading to validation overhead that slows outreach. Derrick delivers verified data directly within 100% native Google Sheets, removing the need for separate validation steps and avoiding CSV exports or complex workflows. Teams save up to 5-10 hours per month and reduce wasted outreach by ensuring data accuracy before campaigns launch. For quick wins, Derrick supports real-time email validation and 50+ enriched attributes per contact to maintain high deliverability without manual checks.

### AI-powered scoring and segmentation for sharper targeting

Apollo and Lemlist struggle with consistent, AI-driven lead scoring and granular segmentation across diverse B2B profiles. Derrick delivers integrated AI Lead Scoring and AI Segmentation directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, leveraging Claude and ChatGPT, without exporting data or juggling multiple tools. Teams see tangible gains: up to 25% faster target refinement and a 15–20% lift in reply rates when audiences are precisely prioritized. A practical use case: auto-summarize profiles and categorize by intent to prioritize high-probability accounts in real time.

### Real-time verification for clean, ready-to-use data

Apollo and Lemlist struggle with real-time data validation and enrichment, often delivering records that require manual checks or post-hoc cleaning. Derrick fixes this by providing real-time email verification and up-to-date enrichment directly within Google Sheets, eliminating separate validation steps. This leads to cleaner, ready-to-use data that reduces bounce risk and speeds up outreach, saving an estimated 5-10 hours per month for teams. With Derrick, data integrity is maintained at the point of capture, not after export.

## apollo vs Lemlist vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Lemlist](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-lemlist-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 39$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and Apollo for outreach?

Derrick and Apollo take fundamentally different approaches to outreach. Apollo excels as a contact database platform with 250 million verified profiles and strong CRM integrations, ideal for high-volume list building. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets as a data enrichment engine, eliminating manual exports and CSV workflows while adding AI-powered scoring and segmentation directly in your spreadsheet. Apollo prioritizes breadth of contact data, while Derrick focuses on enriching and qualifying prospects you already have with real-time email validation and dual AI integration. For teams seeking seamless workflow efficiency without platform switching, Derrick's native Google Sheets approach saves significant time compared to Apollo's traditional outreach infrastructure.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Apollo for teams?

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Apollo depends on your team's priorities. Apollo excels at comprehensive contact databases and multi-channel outreach at scale, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting. However, Derrick offers distinct advantages for teams seeking efficiency: it's 100% native to Google Sheets with no CSV exports, includes integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, provides real-time email validation for better deliverability, and features rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. If your team values simplicity, cost efficiency, and automation without leaving Google Sheets, Derrick delivers faster implementation and lower overhead than Apollo's more complex infrastructure.

### How does Derrick compare to Lemlist for automation?

Derrick automates data enrichment directly within Google Sheets, eliminating manual exports and complex workflows that Lemlist requires. While Lemlist excels at email sequencing and outreach campaigns, Derrick focuses on intelligent contact and company enrichment with real-time email validation, 50+ attributes per record, and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's automation happens upstream in your spreadsheet, ensuring cleaner data before campaigns launch, whereas Lemlist automates the outreach itself. For teams wanting to enrich and qualify prospects faster without leaving Google Sheets, Derrick delivers deeper intelligence automation than Lemlist's campaign-focused approach.

### Which is a better pricing option, Derrick or Apollo?

For pricing, there isn’t a single “better” option between Derrick and Apollo; it depends on what you value most. Apollo is strong on large-scale data and multi-channel outreach with reliable verification and CRM integrations, but costs can add up as you scale and its data enrichment can require extra tools for niche segments. Derrick, by contrast, offers a cost-efficient, native Google Sheets data enrichment approach with flexible credits, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and generous credit rollovers, all without a credit card for the free tier. If you need a lightweight, highly customizable prospecting center that saves time on data processing and offers gradual scaling, Derrick provides clear value. If your priority is expansive, fast data access and outbound automation at scale, Apollo remains compelling. Many teams pair Apollo for data breadth with Derrick for enrichment and automation efficiency.

### Is Derrick a viable replacement for both Apollo and Lemlist?

Derrick serves as a viable complement rather than a complete replacement for both Apollo and Lemlist, each addressing different prospecting needs. Apollo excels at contact database access and verification at scale, while Lemlist specializes in multi-channel outreach automation. Derrick differentiates itself through native Google Sheets integration, eliminating CSV exports and complex setups while offering AI-powered enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and rollover credits. For teams seeking streamlined data enrichment without external platforms, Derrick reduces workflow friction significantly. However, organizations requiring Apollo's extensive contact database or Lemlist's advanced sequencing capabilities may benefit from using Derrick alongside these tools rather than as a standalone replacement, creating a more efficient, integrated prospecting stack.

### What do reviews say about Derrick versus Apollo and Lemlist?

Reviews generally position Apollo and Lemlist as strong, broad outreach platforms focused on data and multi-channel campaigns, with praise for Apollo’s vast contact database, verification, and workflow integrations, and Lemlist’s AI-powered personalization and LinkedIn integration. Common caveats across reviews include data enrichment and accuracy gaps, which sometimes require supplementary tools. Derrick is often highlighted as a complementary solution that excels in native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation, offering a seamless, no-CSV-export workflow. Reviewers note Derrick’s flexible credits model, 100% native integration, and extensive automation reach through Zapier/Make/n8n, which can reduce manual data handling and speed up qualification compared with Apollo and Lemlist when you prioritize depth of lead intelligence and efficiency in a Google Sheets-centric stack.