# Apollo Vs Octopus Crm : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo offers extensive B2B contact databases and outbound sequences but requires platform lock-in and seats at $49-$99/month. Octopus CRM automates LinkedIn actions at $9.99-$24.99/month yet depends entirely on Sales Navigator and risks account flags. Derrick delivers email validation, phone enrichment, and tech stack lookup natively inside Google Sheets from €9/month with credit rollover, avoiding platform switching and enabling instant lead enrichment without LinkedIn dependencies or restrictive seat licenses.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-octopus-crm-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs Octopus CRM  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Octopus CRM vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab0ce8cfda9dedd63bf02_694534a97a7dff00816afde0_image_1766143145456.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Octopus Crm

### Real-time email validation without enrichment gaps

Real-time email validation is a common feature, but Apollo and Octopus CRM struggle to guarantee validation accuracy without leaving gaps in enrichment. Derrick delivers true real-time email validation inside a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, avoiding the need for external CSV exports or complex setups. This means immediate, verifiable deliverability with every newly added lead, reducing bounce rates and improving campaign outcomes by up to 15-20% in deliverability benchmarks. Use cases include instant validation during list building and automatic flagging of risky addresses for faster remediation.

### Comprehensive data enrichment beyond basic contact details

Apollo and Octopus CRM often fall short on deep, multi-source enrichment beyond basic contact details, delivering surface-level profiles or incomplete company intelligence. Derrick differs by delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and company, directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating data silos. This results in measurable gains: faster segmentation and a potential 20–40% lift in outbound accuracy due to richer profiles. A practical use case: instantly enrich a prospect list during a live cold outreach workflow without leaving Sheets.

### AI-powered lead scoring and segmentation for precision targeting

Apollo and Octopus CRM provide basic data and automation, but they fall short on AI-driven precision scoring and nuanced segmentation needed for targeted outreach. Derrick differentiates with integrated AI (Claude and ChatGPT) that automatically scores leads and creates dynamic segments within 100% native Google Sheets workflows. This yields measurable gains: up to 25% higher response rates and clearer ICP alignment, with seamless daily use and no complex exports. Derrick enables rapid, actionable targeting directly from familiar sheets.

## apollo vs Octopus CRM vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Octopus CRM](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-octopus/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 9.99$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Derrick vs apollo: which is the better option for data enrichment?

For data enrichment specifically, Derrick and Apollo serve different strengths. Apollo excels with its 250 million contact database and email verification at scale, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting. However, Derrick offers superior enrichment depth with 50+ attributes per contact and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, all natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports. Derrick's real-time email validation and rollover credits provide better flexibility for teams prioritizing data quality and cost efficiency over sheer database size. Choose Apollo for massive contact discovery, Derrick for intelligent, enriched prospect profiles built directly in your workflow.

### Is Derrick a solid alternative to apollo for outreach?

Yes, Derrick is a solid alternative to Apollo for outreach, particularly if you prioritize ease of use and cost efficiency. While Apollo excels at large-scale contact databases with 250+ million profiles, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex integrations. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, making it ideal for teams seeking streamlined prospecting without technical overhead. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility than Apollo's rigid monthly billing. For outreach workflows prioritizing simplicity and data enrichment depth over raw database size, Derrick delivers comparable value at a fraction of the cost and complexity.

### How does Derrick compare to apollo on pricing and features?

Derrick operates as a 100% native Google Sheets platform requiring no CSV exports or complex setup, directly saving teams 5-10 hours monthly compared to Apollo's external interface. While Apollo excels at large contact databases with 250+ million records, Derrick provides deeper enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Pricing-wise, Derrick starts free with 200 credits and rollover flexibility, whereas Apollo typically demands higher commitments. For teams prioritizing streamlined workflows within Google Sheets and cost efficiency, Derrick eliminates LinkedIn Sales Navigator needs entirely, saving approximately $1,200 annually while delivering real-time email validation and direct Zapier integration capabilities that Apollo handles through rigid API structures.

### Derrick vs apollo vs Octopus CRM: which hub wins for automation?

Derrick wins for automation when you value 100% native Google Sheets-based prospecting, no CSV exports, and a lightweight path to scale without complex setup. Apollo excels in large-scale contact data and outbound workflows, while Octopus CRM shines for LinkedIn-led automation but lacks deep data enrichment and cross-channel depth. Derrick’s real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and 3000+ integration options deliver end-to-end automation inside Sheets, with flexible credits and no credit card required for the free tier. If your priority is seamless, billable automation inside a familiar spreadsheet environment, Derrick stands out.

### Which is the better choice apollo or Octopus CRM for LinkedIn prospecting?

Both Apollo and Octopus CRM serve LinkedIn prospecting differently. Apollo excels with its massive 250 million contact database and advanced email verification, making it ideal for high-volume outreach at scale. Octopus CRM specializes in LinkedIn automation with affordable pricing and simplicity, but lacks deeper data enrichment. For teams wanting LinkedIn prospecting without extra tools, Octopus wins on focus. However, if you need verified contact data combined with seamless automation directly in Google Sheets without manual exports or LinkedIn navigator subscriptions, Derrick App offers native spreadsheet enrichment with 50+ data attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI at a fraction of the cost, eliminating the need for multiple platforms altogether.

### Can Derrick replace apollo and Octopus CRM for small teams?

Yes, Derrick can replace Apollo and Octopus CRM for many small teams, but with context. Derrick excels as a native Google Sheets enrichment and prospecting platform, avoiding CSV exports and complex setups, which can streamline small teams’ workflows. It offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and broad automation via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without a credit card for the free tier. Apollo shines with a massive contact database and outbound automation, while Octopus CRM emphasizes LinkedIn automation and simple CRM tasks. For small teams seeking an all-in-one, cost-efficient, spreadsheet-centric approach with strong enrichment and AI capabilities, Derrick provides a practical, integrated alternative, though teams relying heavily on Apollo’s data breadth or Octopus’s LinkedIn-first automation may still pair Derrick with those tools depending on their needs.