# Apollo Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo offers a comprehensive sales intelligence database with CRM integrations and sequencing tools, ideal for teams needing end-to-end sales automation but requiring external enrichment steps. Skrapp specializes in fast email discovery from LinkedIn at lower price points, though it lacks real-time validation and deep company data. Derrick operates 100% natively inside Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation starting at €9 per month, eliminating tool-switching for teams already working in spreadsheets.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-skrapp-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs Skrapp  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Skrapp vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab0ccfaa146fb44e62e6d_6945343f1b53d32a9e86e84a_image_1766143039118.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Skrapp

### Enrich data accurately without manual validation overhead

Apollo and Skrapp excel at fast data collection but often leave data enrichment quality to manual verification, resulting in incomplete records. Derrick turns this around by delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and real-time email validation, all inside 100% native Google Sheets. This combination reduces manual QA overhead and speeds up accurate profiling, saving teams 5-10 hours per month. With Derrick, you get verified enrichments directly in your sheet, enabling immediate, reliable outreach without leaving the workflow.

### Real-time verification across all data points for reliability

Apollo and Skrapp struggle with universal, real-time data verification across all data points, often delivering incomplete or stale records for fast-moving accounts. Derrick resolves this by providing real-time validation embedded directly in Google Sheets, covering emails, phones, company intel, and 50+ attributes without leaving your workflow. This approach reduces bounce rates and increases deliverability, with measurable impact such as improved campaign success and time saved on manual checks. Use cases include instant score updates and reliable multi-point verification during prospecting sessions.

### Unified data enrichment with no external tools needed

Derrick unifies data enrichment directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external tools that Apollo and Skrapp rely on for separate workflows. Unlike Apollo, which relies on an expansive sales intelligence database that often requires additional enrichment steps, and Skrapp, which focuses primarily on contact discovery, Derrick delivers 50+ attributes and company insights 100% natively. This means you enrich and validate data in one place, reducing handoffs and saving up to 5-10 hours per month. With real-time email validation and AI-powered scoring baked in, Derrick streamlines outreach readiness without leaving Sheets.

## apollo vs Skrapp vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Skrapp](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-skrapp-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 30$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Derrick vs Apollo: which is better for data enrichment accuracy?

Both platforms take different approaches to data accuracy. Apollo excels at scale with its 250 million contact database and real-time verification, making it reliable for high-volume prospecting across broad markets. However, Apollo's data enrichment can lag with niche industries and requires manual validation. Skrapp offers fast LinkedIn-based email extraction with solid accuracy but lacks deeper firmographic enrichment. Derrick differentiates by delivering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation directly within Google Sheets, eliminating export friction. Derrick's integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT enables automated data quality scoring and segmentation, while its rollover credits system provides more cost flexibility than both competitors for teams managing variable prospecting volumes.

### Can Derrick replace Apollo for outreach automation?

Yes, Derrick can effectively replace Apollo for outreach automation, though they serve slightly different purposes. Apollo excels at contact database access and multi-channel outreach at scale, while Derrick provides deeper data enrichment directly within Google Sheets with AI-powered scoring and segmentation using Claude and ChatGPT. If your team prioritizes seamless workflow integration without CSV exports and values rollover credits with no upfront investment, Derrick offers a more flexible alternative. However, if you need Apollo's extensive 250 million contact database, combining both tools often delivers optimal results for comprehensive prospecting strategies.

### What’s the difference between Derrick and Skrapp in pricing?

Derrick operates on a transparent, flexible credit-based model starting at zero dollars with 200 free credits and no credit card required, scaling to $175 for 100,000 credits. Skrapp uses traditional monthly subscription pricing with fixed tiers that don't roll over unused credits, meaning you lose access to unused portions each month. Derrick's rollover credits and lower entry barrier make it more cost-effective for teams with fluctuating prospecting volumes, while Skrapp's rigid monthly structure works best for consistent, predictable usage patterns.

### Derrick vs Skrapp: which offers more features for teams?

Derrick offers more features for teams when compared to Skrapp, primarily because Derrick is a full-fledged B2B data enrichment and prospecting platform deeply integrated with Google Sheets. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, built-in AI scoring and segmentation with Claude and ChatGPT, and access to 3000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without leaving Sheets. Skrapp excels at fast email discovery and LinkedIn-based collection, but it lacks the deep company enrichment, intent signals, and automation depth that Derrick offers. For teams seeking a comprehensive, extensible and AI-assisted prospecting workflow within a familiar spreadsheet environment, Derrick delivers more features and flexibility than Skrapp.

### Which is the better alternative for pricing between Derrick and Apollo?

Derrick offers significantly more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, meaning unused credits carry forward to the next period, whereas Apollo requires consistent monthly spending without carryover. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, while Apollo's entry pricing is higher with less transparency. Derrick's Small plan at 9€ per month with 4000 credits delivers exceptional value compared to Apollo's enterprise-focused pricing structure. For budget-conscious teams or those with variable prospecting volumes, Derrick's rollover credit system and lower entry costs make it the more economical choice, particularly when factoring in integration savings by eliminating the need for separate LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions.

### How do Derrick and Skrapp compare in reviews and use cases?

Derrick and Skrapp differ mainly in scope and integration model. Skrapp excels at fast, browser-based lead discovery with strong email verification and a simple LinkedIn-to-prospect workflow, making it great for quick, volume-driven outreach. Derrick, by contrast, offers a broader B2B data enrichment suite fully native to Google Sheets, plus AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries, plus 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and extensive integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. If you need rapid, single-source contact discovery, Skrapp is solid; if you want deep enrichment, AI-driven automation, and a seamless Google Sheets-based pipeline (with credits that roll over and no credit card for the free tier), Derrick provides more long-term value and workflow flexibility.