# Apollo Vs Surfe : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo offers extensive B2B contact data and built-in sequences but requires platform switching and separate verification steps. Surfe specializes in LinkedIn prospecting with one-click data capture but depends heavily on Sales Navigator and lacks broad automation. Derrick runs natively inside Google Sheets at €9 per month, delivering real-time email validation, 100+ enrichment data points, and 3000+ integrations via Zapier and Make, eliminating exports and reducing data quality overhead by 5-10 hours monthly for lean teams.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-surfe-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs Surfe  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Surfe vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab0cce279ac9ee5f00680_694533fee800ffe64a0666a3_image_1766142974429.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Surfe

### Time saved with real-time validation, fueled by Derrick App

Derrick App delivers real-time validation inside Google Sheets, a capability that Apollo and Surfe struggle to match due to their reliance on separate verification steps and platform constraints. Unlike Surfe’s LinkedIn-centric approach or Apollo’s broader but sometimes inconsistent data validation, Derrick keeps validation live as you work, eliminating back-and-forth checks. This translates to measurable time savings, with teams often reclaiming 5-10 hours per month on data quality tasks. A typical use case: confirm emails and update records on the fly, without leaving Sheets or exporting/importing data.

### 3000+ integrations for flexible automation and workflows

Derrick unlocks flexible automation by offering 3000+ integrations through Zapier, Make, and n8n, bridging workflows that Apollo and Surfe can’t fully automate across multi-tool stacks. Apollo excels at data and verification but struggles with seamless, large-scale workflow orchestration beyond its own funnels, while Surfe focuses on LinkedIn data without deep multi-source automation. Derrick consolidates these capabilities, letting teams trigger actions and enrich records automatically within Google Sheets and downstream apps, reducing manual handoffs. Expect measurable gains: up to 20-35% faster pipeline movement and consistent data propagation across systems.

### Deeper Data Enrichment Through Inline AI Insights

Apollo and Surfe struggle to deliver deep, inline AI-driven enrichment beyond basic contact data and surface-level company intel. Derrick differentiates by weaving AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries directly inside Google Sheets, enriching each record with 50+ attributes and real-time insights without leaving the workflow. This results in faster, more complete profiles and improved targeting, with measurable impact such as higher deliverability and reduced research time. A practical use case is instant auto-summarization of a company profile as you prospect, streamlining decision-making without extra tools.

## apollo vs Surfe vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Surfe](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-surfe-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 29$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Derrick vs apollo: which is better for automation and data enrichment?

Derrick excels at automation and data enrichment directly within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports, whereas Apollo prioritizes contact database scale and verification accuracy. For automation, Derrick's integrated AI using both Claude and ChatGPT enables intelligent scoring and segmentation, while Apollo focuses on multi-channel outreach workflows. Derrick enriches records with 50+ attributes natively and offers rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier, making it more flexible for teams seeking streamlined, sheet-based enrichment workflows compared to Apollo's traditional sales intelligence approach.

### How does Derrick compare to Surfe in pricing and features?

Derrick operates entirely within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that Surfe requires. While Surfe excels at LinkedIn data extraction, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and company with real-time email validation, offering deeper data intelligence. Pricing-wise, Derrick starts free with 200 credits and no credit card required, with rollover credits monthly, whereas Surfe operates on standard subscription tiers. For teams seeking comprehensive B2B enrichment directly in their workflow without LinkedIn dependency, Derrick delivers greater flexibility and cost efficiency at scale.

### Derrick vs apollo vs Surfe: which offers the best overall value?

The best value depends on your specific needs. Apollo excels at large-scale contact databases and verified email finding, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting teams. Surfe specializes in LinkedIn-native workflows with quick contact extraction, perfect for teams already embedded in LinkedIn. Derrick App stands out for teams prioritizing cost efficiency and ease of use, offering native Google Sheets integration with fifty-plus enrichment attributes, AI-powered scoring, and rollover credits starting at just nine dollars monthly. Derrick eliminates expensive LinkedIn Navigator subscriptions and complex CSV workflows, saving five to ten hours monthly while requiring no credit card for the free tier. Choose based on your primary workflow: Apollo for database scale, Surfe for LinkedIn speed, or Derrick for integrated, affordable enrichment without technical overhead.

### Is apollo a better alternative to Surfe for outreach and data?

Yes, Apollo is a strong alternative to Surfe for outreach and data, especially for teams needing a large, verified contact database and multi-channel outreach, with strong CRM integrations and fast prospecting workflows. Apollo shines in breadth and real-time verification, making it great for outbound scale. However, Surfe excels at real-time LinkedIn data capture and quick contact discovery with robust accuracy directly in your browser. If you want deeper enrichment and automation beyond LinkedIn, Derrick App complements Apollo and Surfe by adding 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI scoring, and extensive automation via Google Sheets-native workflows. For a purely LinkedIn-first approach, Surfe may be preferable; for broad data and rapid outbound at scale, Apollo is compelling, and for fully integrated enrichment and automation within Sheets, Derrick adds unique value.

### What’s the difference between Derrick and Surfe in review scores?

Derrick and Surfe take fundamentally different approaches to review scores. Surfe excels in LinkedIn-specific contact extraction with strong real-time accuracy for basic profile data, but reviewers consistently note its limited enrichment depth and single-source dependency. Derrick, by contrast, delivers comprehensive B2B enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring, and real-time email validation—all natively within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or LinkedIn dependency. While Surfe works best for quick contact discovery, Derrick provides deeper data intelligence and automation flexibility that reviewers value for complete prospecting workflows.

### Can Derrick replace both apollo and Surfe for B2B data enrichment?

Derrick cannot be a direct one-to-one replacement for both Apollo and Surfe, but it can substantially complement and, in many cases, replace distinct gaps they leave. Apollo excels at large-scale contact databases and outreach workflows, while Surfe specializes in real-time LinkedIn-enabled contact extraction. Derrick, by contrast, is a 100% native Google Sheets data enrichment platform with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, all without LinkedIn dependence. For teams seeking comprehensive enrichment, multi-source data validation, and automation inside Sheets, Derrick can reduce the need for separate enrichment tools and CSV exports, while Apollo or Surfe may still be preferred for rapid prospecting or LinkedIn-driven lead discovery. If your priority is deep enrichment and cost-efficient automation inside a familiar workflow, Derrick provides a compelling alternative or complement, especially when you want to avoid data handoffs and leverage reportable credits.