# Apollo Vs Texau : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo offers a large contact database with built-in outreach tools, making it suitable for teams that need scale and integrated sequencing. TexAu specializes in LinkedIn automation and data extraction workflows but requires technical setup and lacks native enrichment accuracy. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and no platform switching, starting at €9 per month with credit rollover—ideal for teams prioritizing speed, cost control, and a zero-learning-curve workflow.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-texau-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs TexAu  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs TexAu vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2d4812e3716f09d3047_694533e809e03582a7003eed_image_1766142951475.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Texau

### Real-time validation without data gaps in enrichment

Derrick delivers real-time validation during enrichment, preventing data gaps that Apollo and TexAu often encounter due to delayed updates and partial records. Apollo’s breadth can miss continuous validation across records, while TexAu focuses on text augmentation with limited enrichment accuracy in dynamic datasets. Derrick ensures immediate verification as data is enriched, reducing false positives and improving deliverability metrics. For example, teams can realize up to a 15% lift in valid contact rates month over month with live validation embedded in Sheets.

### Cost-effective setup with 50+ attributes per contact

Apollo and TexAu both struggle to deliver 50+ attribute enrichment per contact within a single workflow, often relying on separate tools or incomplete records. Derrick provides a 100% native Google Sheets setup that delivers 50+ attributes per contact without exporting data or juggling multiple platforms. This translates to tangible savings: up to 5-10 hours per month saved and a more complete, actionable profile ready for immediate prospecting. A typical use case: enrich a contact in-app, validate instantly, and segment for targeted outreach in minutes.

### Unified data model across tools for seamless automation

Apollo and TexAu often struggle with unified data models across disparate tools, leaving gaps when automating multi-tool workflows. Derrick addresses this by providing a 100% native Google Sheets solution that harmonizes enrichment across LinkedIn, company intelligence, and AI-powered scoring within a single data model. This coherence reduces manual re-entry and data mismatches, saving up to 5-10 hours per month while improving data consistency. With Derrick, teams can orchestrate seamless automation end-to-end, without switching between incompatible platforms.

## apollo vs TexAu vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [TexAu](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-texa/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs Apollo main difference for teams?

The main difference for teams lies in how they operate within your workflow. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup, while Apollo relies on an external platform requiring data migration. Derrick integrates AI capabilities from both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation directly in your spreadsheet, whereas Apollo focuses on contact database access and outreach automation. For teams already working in Google Sheets, Derrick saves five to ten hours monthly and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it more accessible for testing before commitment.

### Is Derrick a good alternative to TexAu?

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to TexAu, particularly if you're looking for comprehensive B2B data enrichment rather than just text automation. While TexAu excels at text processing, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets and enriches contact and company data with 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick eliminates the need for external platforms, CSV exports, and complex setup workflows, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly. Unlike TexAu's limited customization, Derrick offers flexible credit rollover, no credit card requirement for free tier access, and seamless integration with 3000+ tools via Zapier and Make, making it better suited for teams requiring deeper prospect intelligence and streamlined prospecting workflows within their existing spreadsheet environment.

### Derrick vs Apollo vs TexAu: which is best overall?

The best choice depends on your specific needs. Apollo excels at large-scale contact databases with 250+ million verified profiles, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting teams. TexAu focuses on text automation and content processing rather than B2B intelligence. Derrick stands out for teams already using Google Sheets, offering 100% native integration without CSV exports, AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits starting at just 9€ monthly. If you prioritize seamless workflow integration and cost efficiency, Derrick eliminates the need for multiple tools while Apollo suits enterprises requiring massive contact databases.

### Is Apollo pricing better than TexAu for SMBs?

Is Apollo pricing better than TexAu for SMBs? Not directly comparable, as Apollo targets comprehensive B2B prospecting with millions of contacts and CRM workflows, often at a higher total cost for teams needing deep data and multi-channel outreach. TexAu focuses on automated writing and text augmentation with a simpler, more affordable setup ideal for content workflows. For SMBs, Apollo may deliver faster pipeline generation but at a bigger investment, while TexAu offers cost-effective automation for writing tasks. Derrick App can complement either by adding native Google Sheets enrichment, AI scoring, and seamless integrations, potentially delivering a lower overall cost of ownership and stronger data accuracy without complex exports or additional tools.

### What are the Derrick features that beat Apollo?

Derrick operates as a fully native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex external configurations that Apollo requires. Unlike Apollo's database-centric approach, Derrick combines 50+ enrichment attributes with integrated AI powered by both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits system and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than Apollo's traditional pricing model, making it ideal for teams prioritizing seamless workflow integration and cost efficiency.

### How does TexAu compare with Derrick on automation?

TexAu and Derrick approach automation from different angles. TexAu excels at automated text processing, data augmentation, and batch workflow tasks with a straightforward, low-friction interface. It shines for scalable writing and content-related automation, but its scope is more narrow and tooling-focused than full-scale prospecting automation. Derrick, by contrast, is a 100% native Google Sheets platform designed to automate B2B enrichment and outreach directly inside Sheets, with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and broad integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. If you need end-to-end prospecting automation and multi-channel workflow in a single environment, Derrick offers deeper automation capabilities and a more integrated data enrichment stack, while TexAu is a strong companion for specialized text augmentation tasks within broader processes. For teams evaluating both, TexAu is best as a writing-automation layer, whereas Derrick provides comprehensive, native automation and enrichment for scalable B2B outreach.