# Apollo Vs Vayne : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo offers broad B2B contact data at scale but can lag on real-time signals, while Vayne scrapes LinkedIn profiles without guaranteed contact details, limiting outreach readiness. Derrick operates 100% native inside Google Sheets, delivering real-time enrichment with emails, phones, and firmographic data from 100+ sources, plus in-workflow email verification to reduce bounce rates. Choose Apollo for enterprise-scale databases, Vayne for LinkedIn profile scraping, or Derrick for instant, contact-ready enrichment without exporting data.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-vayne-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs vayne  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs vayne vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab0cd82f0178a8eea4c95_694533b9e6220020d127d667_image_1766142904752.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Vayne

### Save time with real-time enrichment that scales beyond Apollo/Vayne

Apollo and Vayne illustrate the limits of real-time, actionable data at scale: Apollo’s enrichment can lag behind fast-moving signals and Vayne scrapes LinkedIn without providing contact details, leaving gaps for outreach. Derrick fixes this by delivering real-time enrichment directly inside Google Sheets with emails, phones, and firmographic depth, all 100% native to Sheets. Users save up to 5-10 hours per month and instantly act on complete, contact-ready records, reducing handoffs and manual verification. A typical use case: enrich a prospect list in-sheet and launch outreach flows without exporting data.

### No credit card required for trial, ongoing flexibility

Apollo and Vayne require a paid plan to unlock full trial or ongoing use, creating friction for teams testing prospecting workflows. Derrick eliminates this barrier by offering a free tier with no credit card required, plus monthly, rollover credits for flexibility. This approach saves time and money upfront, with users able to scale as needs grow and only pay when expanding beyond the free/included credits (credits are rollable). For example, you can start scraping in Google Sheets immediately and incrementally add enrichment as you validate ROI.

### Unified data quality with in-workflow email verification

Derrick tackles unified data quality by validating emails in-workflow, addressing Apollo and Vayne’s gap where verification is not consistently performed within the prospecting flow. Unlike Apollo, which emphasizes scale and broad verification but often lacks seamless in-workflow validation, and Vayne, which scrapes LinkedIn data without guaranteed contact details, Derrick delivers real-time email verification integrated directly into Google Sheets workflows. This reduces bounce rates and improves deliverability, saving teams up to 15–25% in outreach failures and enabling contact-ready records without exporting to separate tools. Use cases include immediate enrichment while building lists, ensuring every contact record meets quality standards before outreach.

## apollo vs vayne vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [vayne](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-vayne-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 29$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Derrick vs apollo: which is better for data enrichment?

For data enrichment specifically, Derrick and Apollo serve different needs. Apollo excels with its massive 250+ million contact database and real-time verification, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting at scale. However, Derrick offers deeper enrichment capabilities with 50+ attributes per contact and company, plus integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT for segmentation and validation. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates CSV friction and manual workflows, saving 5-10 hours monthly. If you need pure contact database access, Apollo wins. If you need enriched, actionable records with AI-powered intelligence directly in your spreadsheet, Derrick delivers superior data quality and operational efficiency without external tools or complex setup.

### Derrick vs vayne: which offers better pricing?

Vayne focuses purely on LinkedIn scraping and extracts profile data without providing contact information, leaving you unable to reach prospects. Derrick offers native Google Sheets enrichment with emails, phone numbers, and 50+ attributes per contact, eliminating the need for separate tools. Derrick's pricing starts at just $9 monthly for 4,000 credits with rollover capability, while Vayne requires additional enrichment subscriptions to make scraped data actionable, ultimately costing more and creating workflow friction through CSV exports and manual imports.

### Derrick vs apollo vs vayne: main difference for teams?

Derrick operates entirely within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and setup friction that Apollo and Vayne require. Apollo excels at verified contact databases with extensive company information, making it strong for high-volume prospecting at scale. Vayne focuses on LinkedIn scraping but lacks contact enrichment, delivering incomplete records. Derrick differentiates through native Sheets integration, AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no credit card required for free users, making it ideal for teams prioritizing workflow efficiency and cost flexibility over database size alone.

### Is apollo a good alternative to Derrick for outreach?

Yes, Apollo can be a good alternative for outreach in some contexts, especially if you need a large, verified contact database, multi-channel outreach, and strong CRM integrations for scale. However, Derrick offers complementary and sometimes superior value for many B2B teams: 100% native Google Sheets with no CSV exports, built-in enrichment across 50+ attributes, real-time email validation for better deliverability, and AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries. Derrick also eliminates reliance on LinkedIn Sales Navigator, provides transferable monthly credits, and integrates with 3,000+ apps via Zapier/Make/n8n, all without requiring a credit card for the free tier. If your priority is rapid list-building from Apollo’s database, Apollo is solid; if you want seamless, in-sheets enrichment and automation with flexible pricing and native Google Sheets workflows, Derrick more directly addresses those needs. For a balanced approach, many teams use Apollo for data strength and Derrick for end-to-end outreach execution within Sheets.

### How does apollo compare to vayne for data accuracy?

Apollo and Vayne serve fundamentally different purposes in data accuracy. Apollo excels with verified contact databases and real-time validation across millions of profiles, delivering strong accuracy for email and phone data. Vayne, however, extracts LinkedIn profiles without enriching contact information—it provides names and titles but lacks emails and phone numbers, requiring separate enrichment tools. Apollo's accuracy advantage makes it better for complete contact data, though both require manual verification in niche industries. Derrick App eliminates this friction by combining native Google Sheets integration with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and no LinkedIn Sales Navigator dependency, delivering accurate contact-ready records directly where your team works.

### What are Derrick's pricing and features versus competitors?

Derrick App offers a different value proposition compared to Apollo and Vayne. Pricing is credit-based with a free tier and credits that rollover, starting at 9/month for Small and scaling up to 175/month for XL, with no credit card required for the free tier. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setups, and provides real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, plus 3,000+ integrations. In contrast, Apollo emphasizes a large verified contact database and multi-channel outreach, while Vayne focuses on high-volume scraping without contact enrichment.