# Apollo Vs Waalaxy : Comparaison > **Quick answer**: Apollo excels at multi-channel outreach with strong intent data and firmographic filters, while Waalaxy specializes in LinkedIn automation and sequence workflows. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets without exports or separate platforms, starting at €9 per month with real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. Choose Apollo for enterprise-scale sales intelligence, Waalaxy for LinkedIn-focused campaigns, or Derrick for teams preferring native Sheets workflows with credit rollover and no seat limits. *Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-waalaxy-vs-derrick-app* --- Compare apollo vs Waalaxy side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy. [Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Waalaxy vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab3399fbd28e7994d275d_69453393a60f394eff4791f7_image_1766142867047.png) ## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Waalaxy ### Save time with real-time validation and native Sheets simplicity Apollo and Waalaxy struggle with real-time data validation and native Sheets workflows, often requiring manual checks or separate tools to keep records clean. Derrick delivers real-time validation directly inside Google Sheets and keeps everything 100% native, eliminating export steps and complex setup. This translates to tangible time savings—up to 5-10 hours per month reclaimed for prospecting and data hygiene. With Derrick, you get instant feedback on addresses and contacts within Sheets, plus seamless enrichment across 50+ attributes to power accurate outreach. ### Comprehensive data enrichment beyond basic LinkedIn data limits Apollo and Waalaxy often cap enrichment to basic LinkedIn data, leaving gaps in firmographics and contact context. Derrick delivers comprehensive data enrichment beyond those limits by leveraging 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-assisted profiling within 100% native Google Sheets. This means measurable improvements in data completeness and lead quality, plus faster onboarding with no CSV exports or complex setup. Use cases like rapid prospect profiling and accurate segmentation become routine, saving hours monthly and reducing bounce rates across campaigns. ### Effortless data quality with continuous enrichment AI Apollo and Waalaxy often struggle with deep, consistent data enrichment beyond basic LinkedIn data, leading to incomplete profiles and manual verification needs. Derrick tackles this by delivering continuous enrichment AI within 100% native Google Sheets, enriching 50+ attributes per contact and offering AI scoring and summarization to ensure ongoing data quality. Teams save time and reduce errors, with measurable gains like up to 5-10 hours saved per month on data cleanup and improved deliverability from real-time email validation. A practical use case: auto-refreshing company and contact profiles as market data shifts, keeping pipelines accurate without extra tooling. ## apollo vs Waalaxy vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell. | | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Waalaxy](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-waalaxy-2/) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | | Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | | Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | | Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | | SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | | AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | | Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | | Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | | Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ | | Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | | Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 21€/mois | | Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | | Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | | Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ | | Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ## Frequently Asked Question ### What's the main difference between Derrick and Apollo for outreach? Derrick and Apollo take fundamentally different approaches to outreach. Apollo excels as a contact database platform with 250+ million verified profiles and strong email finding capabilities, making it ideal for high-volume prospecting. Derrick, however, operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations while providing 50+ enrichment attributes per contact alongside integrated AI tools like Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent segmentation and scoring. Apollo requires external workflows, whereas Derrick streamlines everything directly in your spreadsheet, saving 5-10 hours monthly. For teams prioritizing workflow efficiency and data enrichment depth with lower overhead, Derrick offers a more integrated alternative to Apollo's database-centric model. ### Is Derrick a better alternative to Apollo for data enrichment? Derrick offers a fundamentally different approach to data enrichment compared to Apollo. While Apollo excels at providing a massive contact database with verified emails, it requires external workflows and CSV exports. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating data export friction and saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick also delivers fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact alongside integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, which Apollo doesn't provide. For teams prioritizing workflow efficiency and data quality without leaving their spreadsheet, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier make it a more flexible alternative to Apollo's rigid subscription model. ### Which offers better pricing: Derrick or Apollo for startups? For startups, Derrick offers significantly better pricing flexibility than Apollo. Derrick's free tier includes 200 credits with no credit card required, and its smallest paid plan costs just $9 monthly with rollover credits you keep each month. Apollo requires higher minimum commitments and doesn't offer unused credit rollover, making it more expensive for teams with variable prospecting volume. Additionally, Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving startups approximately $1,200 annually compared to Apollo's ecosystem requirements, while delivering comparable data enrichment directly within Google Sheets. ### How does Derrick compare to Waalaxy in automation features? Derrick and Waalaxy differ fundamentally in scope. Waalaxy excels at LinkedIn-driven automation and multi-channel outreach, with strong ease of use and solid CRM integration, but its data enrichment is relatively shallow and relies on LinkedIn data, which can limit accuracy and depth. Derrick, by contrast, offers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring/segmentation, all without CSV exports or LinkedIn dependencies. For teams prioritizing data quality and scalable enrichment at pace, Derrick provides a stronger automation backbone, while Waalaxy remains strong for LinkedIn-centric outreach. ### Can Derrick replace both Apollo and Waalaxy for prospecting? Derrick can serve as a primary prospecting solution, but it fills a different role than Apollo and Waalaxy. Derrick excels at data enrichment directly within Google Sheets with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Apollo dominates contact discovery with its 250 million database, while Waalaxy automates LinkedIn outreach. For comprehensive prospecting, many teams use Derrick's enrichment alongside Apollo's database or Waalaxy's automation. Derrick's rollover credits, no card requirement for free tier, and native Sheets integration make it cost-effective for enrichment workflows, but you may still need Apollo or Waalaxy depending on your outreach channel preferences and database requirements. ### What are Derrick's advantages as an alternative to both Apollo and Waalaxy? Derrick offers a unique edge as an alternative to both Apollo and Waalaxy by delivering native Google Sheets enrichment and outreach without complex exports or LinkedIn dependencies. Unlike Apollo, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and real-time email validation directly in Sheets, plus AI-powered scoring and segmentation with Claude and ChatGPT, all within a familiar workflow. Compared to Waalaxy, Derrick reduces setup friction, eliminates LinkedIn reliance, and adds flexible credits that roll over monthly, with a free tier and no credit card required, plus 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n to fit diverse tech stacks. This combination supports efficient, scalable prospecting while preserving data quality and automation, making Derrick a strong, verifiable alternative for teams seeking integrated enrichment and AI-assisted insights.