# Apollo Vs Wiza : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Apollo excels at outbound scale and built-in sequencing but lacks granular enrichment depth, while Wiza focuses on LinkedIn extraction with limited data attributes and requires Sales Navigator at $100/month. Derrick operates natively inside Google Sheets at €9/month with 100+ enrichment data points, real-time email verification, and credit rollover, making it ideal for teams that centralize prospecting workflows in Sheets and need richer contact profiles without switching platforms or managing CSV exports.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/apollo-vs-wiza-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare apollo vs Wiza  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![apollo vs Wiza vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab0c94cb2a8317a458b64_6945336cd4888f242e15bef9_image_1766142827932.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Apollo Or Wiza

### Enrich data quality, not just outreach, with Derrick's native Sheets

Derrick differentiates itself from Apollo and Wiza by delivering 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, turning Sheets into a full prospecting hub without CSV exports or complex setup. While Apollo excels at scale but can struggle with granular data enrichment, and Wiza focuses on outreach with limited enrichment, Derrick adds 50+ attributes per contact and real-time validation directly inside Sheets. This yields measurable gains in data quality and workflow efficiency, saving 5-10 hours per month for teams that rely on accurate, in-Sheets insights. No credit card required to start.

### Real-time email verification without data decay risk

Real-time email verification is hampered by data decay risks in Apollo and Wiza, where contact details can go stale between checks. Derrick delivers continuous, real-time validation within 100% native Google Sheets, preventing stale records from entering workflows. By verifying emails as you prospect, Derrick reduces bounce risk and improves deliverability, translating to measurable efficiency gains like up to 15-20% higher email engagement and lower rework time. Use cases include on-the-fly list cleaning during initial outreach to maintain pristine, actionable leads.

### Scaleable enrichment without manual workflows and limits

Apollo and Wiza are limited by manual, non-scale enrichment flows and surface-level data, forcing teams to trade speed for depth. Derrick automates scalable enrichment directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating export steps and complex workarounds. With 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and real-time validation, Derrick delivers richer profiles at scale without workflow bottlenecks, saving 5-10 hours per month. Free-tier access and credits-based pricing make this scalable approach affordable for ongoing prospecting cycles.

## apollo vs Wiza vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) | Derrick App | [Wiza](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-wiza-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 59$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Can Derrick vs Apollo outperform Wiza in data enrichment?

Yes, Derrick and Apollo both outperform Wiza in data enrichment depth. Apollo excels with its 250 million contact database and real-time verification, offering superior accuracy and breadth. However, Derrick provides more flexible enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and native Google Sheets functionality eliminating manual exports. Wiza, primarily a LinkedIn automation tool, lacks dedicated enrichment capabilities and relies on surface-level profile data. For comprehensive data enrichment workflows, Derrick's native sheet integration and AI-powered segmentation offer advantages over both competitors, particularly for teams avoiding external platforms and complex configurations.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Apollo for automation?

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Apollo depends on your specific automation needs. Apollo excels at large-scale contact database access and multi-channel outreach with verified email and phone data across millions of profiles. Derrick, however, operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or external platforms, saving teams five to ten hours monthly while offering integrated AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. If you prioritize workflow efficiency within your existing spreadsheet infrastructure and need flexible monthly credits that roll over, Derrick delivers advantages Apollo doesn't. For teams requiring Apollo's extensive contact database combined with Derrick's automation efficiency, both tools complement each other effectively in a comprehensive prospecting stack.

### What’s the difference between Derrick and Wiza in features?

Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform focusing on data enrichment and AI-powered automation, while Wiza specializes exclusively in LinkedIn automation for connection requests and outreach sequences. Derrick offers fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact and company with integrated Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent scoring and segmentation, whereas Wiza relies primarily on LinkedIn's surface-level data without deeper firmographic enrichment. Derrick's credits roll over monthly with no credit card required for the free tier, providing greater flexibility than Wiza's subscription model for teams managing variable prospecting volumes.

### How does Apollo vs Wiza pricing compare?

Apollo pricing emphasizes a broad, scalable B2B prospecting toolkit with a strong database and outreach features, while Wiza centers on LinkedIn automation and contact verification. Apollo plans tend to reflect extensive data access and workflows, often at higher upfront cost for advanced features; Wiza pricing leans toward volume-driven automation with simpler data scope. Derrick App, by contrast, offers native 100% Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and flexible credits with rollover, at transparent tiered pricing from free 200 credits to large 100k credits, all without a credit card for the free tier. This combination can deliver cost-efficient prospecting and seamless integration, potentially filling data quality gaps that Apollo or Wiza might encounter in isolation.

### Which is the better review option for Derrick customers?

For Derrick customers, the better review option depends on your specific workflow. If you're prioritizing LinkedIn-based automation and rapid outreach at scale, Wiza excels at connection velocity and ease of use. However, if you need comprehensive data enrichment with verified contact information and deeper prospect intelligence, Apollo offers a more robust database with stronger CRM integrations. That said, Derrick's native Google Sheets integration, 50+ enrichment attributes, built-in AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits provide a more flexible, cost-effective alternative that eliminates manual CSV exports and reduces your tech stack complexity. For teams already operating in Google Sheets, Derrick delivers superior enrichment depth without requiring external platforms.

### Can Derrick replace both Apollo and Wiza?

Derrick cannot be considered a complete replacement for both Apollo and Wiza in every scenario, but it can replace specific gaps they leave. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and prospecting center with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and extensive automation through 3,000+ integrations. Apollo delivers broad B2B data access, strong outreach workflows, and an expansive contact database, while Wiza emphasizes LinkedIn-based outreach and verification. If your priority is data enrichment, cost-efficient workflow within Sheets, and AI-driven segmentation, Derrick subsumes several capabilities, potentially reducing dependence on Wiza for outreach automation and on Apollo for data sourcing. However, for teams needing deep enrichment breadth, niche industry data, or LinkedIn-centric automation at scale, Apollo and Wiza still offer complementary strengths. Derrick can replace or augment parts of both, especially where Google Sheets-native, roll-over credits, and AI scoring streamline your process.