# Comparing BetterContact vs FullEnrich : pricing, features, and the alternatives

> **TL;DR** BetterContact vs FullEnrich : real-world feature + pricing breakdown for 2026 procurement decisions. Includes Derrick App ($10/mo) as the Sheet-native alternative to both.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/bettercontact-vs-fullenrich-vs-derrick-app*

---

## Why choose Derrick against BetterContact or FullEnrich

### Native Google Sheets enrichment, no CSV exports
BetterContact and FullEnrich both run as standalone platforms — separate UIs, separate logins, CSV exports + imports to move data into your CRM or spreadsheet. Derrick skips that entire layer : you enrich a Google Sheet with a formula (=DERRICK_EMAIL, =DERRICK_PHONE, =DERRICK_TECH) and the column populates inline. No platform-switching, no CSV round-trip.

### $10/mo flat — predictable spend, no overage shock
BetterContact starts at Free 50 credits · Starter $15/mo ; FullEnrich starts at $59/month. Both stack credits, seats, and feature unlocks per tier — your actual bill depends on usage you can't always predict upfront. Derrick is $10/month flat, unlimited rows enriched. That's the entire pricing page : one tier, one number, no overage exposure.

### Plug Derrick into Claude / ChatGPT via MCP — no glue code
For teams adopting AI SDR / RevOps workflows : Derrick's MCP support means your enrichment layer is callable by any compliant agent (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, n8n with MCP nodes). BetterContact and FullEnrich require Zapier or custom code at this layer — a meaningful integration tax as AI-agent stacks mature.

## Comparison : BetterContact vs FullEnrich vs Derrick

|  | [BetterContact](/tools/bettercontact-review) | Derrick App | [FullEnrich](/tools/fullenrich-review) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Entry price | Free 50 credits · Starter $15/mo | $10/mo flat | $59/month |
| Free plan | Yes - 50 free credits to test | 14-day full trial | 25 free credits on signup |
| Best for | Outbound teams who want best-find-rate at one subscription cost | Sheet-native enrichment | Teams replacing 3-4 enrichment subs |
| Category positioning | Waterfall Email + Phone Enrichment | Spreadsheet-native B2B data | B2B contact data |
| G2 rating | 4.8/5 | — | 4.7/5 |
| Founded | 2022 | 2022 | 2023 |
| Email accuracy / verification | 87-95% (best in category) | Real-time, included | Standard |
| Phone-number coverage | Available via providers | Via integrated providers | Available via providers |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Per-row pricing (no credit caps) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| MCP-ready for AI / LLM agents | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |

## BetterContact vs FullEnrich vs Derrick App pricing in a nutshell

### BetterContact pricing (Outbound teams who want best-find-rate at one subscription cost)
For outbound teams who want best-find-rate at one subscription cost, BetterContact waterfall email + phone enrichment starts at Free 50 credits · Starter $15/mo. Tier ceilings, credit refresh rules, and per-seat economics are all detailed on the BetterContact pricing page below.
[Visit pricing](/tools/bettercontact-pricing)

### Derrick App
Results first. Complexity removed. Native Google Sheets workflow, 100+ data points, AI-powered scoring, €9/month entry plan, 100 free credits.
[Discover Derrick](https://derrick-app.com/)

### FullEnrich pricing (Teams replacing 3-4 enrichment subs)
FullEnrich pricing entry sits at $59/month (b2b contact data). Sized for teams replacing 3-4 enrichment subs. The detailed FullEnrich pricing breakdown (tier-by-tier feature matrix + true TCO) is on the dedicated pricing page.
[Visit pricing](/tools/fullenrich-pricing)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### BetterContact vs FullEnrich: when does each fit best?
BetterContact is positioned as waterfall email + phone enrichment for outbound teams who want best-find-rate at one subscription cost. FullEnrich is positioned as b2b contact data for teams replacing 3-4 enrichment subs. These are different category bets — BetterContact for its niche, FullEnrich for B2B contact data. Most teams either pick one based on primary use case or stack both for adjacent workflows. G2 reviewers rate BetterContact at 4.8/5 and FullEnrich at 4.7/5 — both products work, the deciding factor is workflow fit, not product quality.

### How do BetterContact and FullEnrich pricing actually compare in 2026?
BetterContact entry-paid tier : Starter at $15/mo. Next tier up is Pro (Most Popular - 91% of users) ($49/mo). BetterContact's free tier : Yes - 50 free credits to test. FullEnrich entry-paid tier : Starter at $59/month. Next tier up is Pro ($119/month). FullEnrich's free tier : 25 free credits on signup. For comparison : Derrick App skips the credit + seat model entirely with $10/month for unlimited enrichment, billed directly in the Sheet.

### What's the biggest reason to pick BetterContact over FullEnrich?
Highest find rates in the category (87-95% emails). Waterfall enrichment from 20+ providers delivers 87-95% email match rates and 70-85% phone match rates - meaningfully higher than the 60-70% typical of single-source tools. For outbound teams running serious volume, the find-rate uplift directly translates to TAM coverage that single-source tools structurally miss. (Source : Verified G2 user, Outbound Lead, G2 review (Q1 2026).) If this single capability maps to a real pain in your sales motion, BetterContact is the right pick over FullEnrich.

### What's the biggest reason to pick FullEnrich over BetterContact?
Hit rates that single-provider tools can't match. By querying 15+ providers in sequence, FullEnrich routinely lifts email + phone match rates 15-30% above what any single provider delivers alone. For hard-to-find prospects (small companies, EU markets, niche roles), the waterfall is the difference between a working list and a 40% empty one. (Source : Léa M., Demand Gen Lead, G2 review (Feb 2026).) If this is the differentiator that matters most for your stack, FullEnrich is the right pick over BetterContact.

### Can Derrick replace both BetterContact and FullEnrich?
BetterContact (waterfall email + phone enrichment) and FullEnrich (b2b contact data) cover different category needs, so the question depends on which one Derrick maps against. Derrick is a Sheets-native enrichment + search layer at $10/mo flat — it directly substitutes for the data layer of either tool. For the platform-specific features (sequencing, intent, automation), Derrick complements BetterContact and FullEnrich rather than replacing them outright.

### Beyond BetterContact and FullEnrich, what other tools should I evaluate?
Four other tools in the same competitive set worth evaluating : Clay, Apollo, Dropcontact, Findymail. Each has its own positioning trade-off versus BetterContact and FullEnrich — Clay typically appears as a direct competitor on G2 review pages, with Apollo, Dropcontact, Findymail as adjacent picks for different team sizes or use cases. For an apples-to-apples evaluation, run each candidate's review side-by-side against your specific procurement criteria.