# Clay Vs Adapt.Io : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Clay excels at waterfall enrichment across 75+ providers with advanced automation but starts at $149/month and requires setup time. Adapt.io focuses on B2B contact discovery with a large proprietary database, priced from $49/month, ideal for outbound at scale. Derrick runs natively inside Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes from €9/month, eliminating tool-switching and setup toil for teams who live in spreadsheets and need instant, no-code enrichment workflows without platform migration.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/clay-vs-adapt-io-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Clay vs Adapt.io  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Clay vs Adapt.io vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab33cba299d5687c85f09_694537672eca1aa07275a0b0_image_1766143846897.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Clay Or Adapt.Io

### Get 50+ attributes enriched in Sheets without setup toil

Clay and Adapt.io require setup toil and multi-source coordination to enrich 50+ attributes, delaying time-to-value. Derrick delivers 50+ attributes enriched directly in Google Sheets without any setup toil, staying 100% native to Sheets. This eliminates configuration steps and data transfers, saving 5-10 hours per month for teams. With Derrick, you get immediate enrichment and seamless in-Sheets workflows, ready for action right away.

### Immediate, no-code data validation before outreach success

Clay and Adapt.io often struggle with real-time, no-code data validation before outreach, leaving campaigns uncertain until after contacts are loaded. Derrick delivers immediate, pre-outreach validation inside 100% native Google Sheets, with real-time email verification and 50+ enriched attributes, no complex setup. This reduces wasted outreach by ensuring deliverable contacts from the start, saving 5-10h per month and improving deliverability margins. For fast wins, Derrick’s no-card-free tier and instant validation mean you can launch confident campaigns without switching tools.

### Real-time data quality assurance with instant corrections

Clay and Adapt.io struggle with real-time data quality and pre-outreach validation, often delivering outdated or inconsistent contact data that delays campaigns. Derrick addresses this by providing real-time data quality assurance with instant corrections directly inside Google Sheets. Users gain immediate, no-code validation that prevents flawed outreach, reducing bounce and opt-out risk while improving deliverability. With Derrick, you can fix data on the fly and keep lists clean for high-stakes campaigns, saving hours per week.

## Clay vs Adapt.io vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Clay](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-clay-2/) | Derrick App | [Adapt.io](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-adapt-io-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and Clay for outreach?

Derrick and Clay take fundamentally different approaches to outreach. Clay is a comprehensive data enrichment and automation platform that excels at building complex prospecting workflows across multiple data sources, but requires significant setup time and technical configuration. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports, making it faster to deploy and easier for non-technical teams. While Clay offers deeper workflow customization, Derrick prioritizes speed and simplicity with built-in AI scoring, real-time email validation, and rollover credits that don't expire monthly, making it ideal for teams wanting immediate outreach capability without platform complexity.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Clay for SMBs?

Derrick offers a more streamlined alternative to Clay for SMBs, particularly those already using Google Sheets. While Clay excels at complex workflow automation and multi-source data aggregation, it requires significant setup time and can be overwhelming for smaller teams. Derrick's 100% native Google Sheets integration eliminates CSV exports and technical complexity, saving five to ten hours monthly. Additionally, Derrick includes built-in AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. For SMBs prioritizing simplicity and speed over advanced automation workflows, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value at a lower barrier to entry.

### How does Derrick compare to Adapt.io in pricing and features?

Derrick is a Google Sheets-native platform requiring no complex setup or CSV exports, while Adapt.io functions as a broader workflow automation tool. Pricing-wise, Derrick starts free with 200 credits and no credit card required, with credits rolling over monthly, whereas Adapt.io follows traditional SaaS pricing. Feature-wise, Derrick combines data enrichment with integrated AI scoring from Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and 50+ contact attributes, positioning it as a streamlined enrichment solution versus Adapt.io's general integration focus, making Derrick ideal for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity within Google Sheets workflows.

### Which is cheaper, Clay or Adapt.io, for mid-market teams?

For mid-market teams, Clay and Adapt.io pricing can vary by features and scale, but generally Adapt.io tends to be the more affordable option for straightforward automations, while Clay can become costlier with large data enrichment and complex outreach needs. That said, Derrick offers a more cost-efficient blend for mid-market growth: a no-CB free tier, scalable credits, and 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, eliminating CSV exports and heavy setup. If your priority is price-per-value with simplicity, Adapt.io or Clay may appeal, but Derrick delivers predictable costs, better data enrichment per contact, real-time email validation, and flexible credits that rollover, making it a compelling, often cheaper alternative for mid-market teams prioritizing speed and ease of use.

### What’s Derrick’s pricing advantage versus Clay and Adapt.io?

Derrick offers significantly lower entry costs with a free tier requiring no credit card and plans starting at just nine dollars monthly with rollover credits, whereas Clay and Adapt.io typically demand higher minimum commitments. Derrick's Google Sheets native integration eliminates the need for expensive LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions that Clay users often require, saving teams over twelve hundred dollars annually. Additionally, Derrick includes built-in AI capabilities with Claude and ChatGPT integration for free, whereas competitors charge separately for advanced features, making Derrick the most cost-effective solution for budget-conscious teams prioritizing simplicity and transparency.

### Can Derrick replace both Clay and Adapt.io for data enrichment?

Derrick cannot fully replace Clay and Adapt.io for every data enrichment use case, but it covers many of the core needs with a different approach. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, offering real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, all without CSV exports or complex setup. Clay provides broader multi-source data aggregation, real-time verification, and robust workflow automation, while Adapt.io emphasizes easy connectivity and standard enrichment pipelines with strong CRM integration. If your priority is simplicity, speed, and spreadsheet-based workflows, Derrick can handle most enrichment tasks effectively. For highly specialized data sourcing, complex enrichment rules, or enterprise-grade validation at scale, you may still want Clay or Adapt.io, potentially in combination with Derrick to maximize data quality and operational efficiency.