# Clay Vs Derrick App: Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Clay excels at complex multi-step enrichment workflows with deep customization and extensive integrations, while Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with no external platform required. Clay suits teams needing advanced logic and API orchestration, often at higher price points and setup time. Derrick starts at €9 per month with 100% native Sheets workflows, real-time validation, and no-credit-card free tier, ideal for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity over maximum configurability.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/clay-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Clay vs derrick app side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Clay vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab33ce6611f854b5e932f_694537caba9b616166f259c6_image_1766143946424.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Clay.

### Get 5-10h/mo saved with native Sheets workflow

Clay can require significant setup time and complex configuration to build native Sheets workflows, which can slow teams down. Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets experience, eliminating exports, complex setup, and external dependencies to streamline prospecting right in Sheets. By automating data enrichment and validation directly inside Sheets, Derrick saves 5-10 hours per month of manual data wrangling and workflow management. A typical use case is rapid list enrichment and scoring without leaving Sheets, improving efficiency and delivery speed.

### No credit card needed for rapid setup and trial

Clay makes it clear that rapid setup often stalls without an immediate trial and a no-credit-card path, highlighting the friction of payment barriers. Derrick removes this hurdle by offering a free tier with no card required for quick onboarding and trial, enabling instant exploration of native Google Sheets workflows. Users can start testing real enrichment and 50+ attributes across contacts without commitment, saving time and potentially accelerating time-to-value. Derrick’s free tier credits and 100% native Sheets experience ensure a tangible trial without financial risk or setup delays.

### Real-time data quality boost without manual validation

Clay highlights that real-time validation can be challenging and data accuracy varies with source freshness, especially for immediate campaign deployment. Derrick delivers a real-time data quality boost directly within 100% native Google Sheets, avoiding manual validation steps and complex setup. Users can expect faster go-to-opportunity timelines with fewer errors, leveraging automated real-time checks across 50+ attributes per contact or company. For quick wins, Derrick’s native Sheets workflow means you validate on the fly without leaving your sheet, reducing delays in outreach cadence.

## Clay vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | Derrick App | [Clay](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-clay-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 9€/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and Clay for enrichment?

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets with real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex workflow setup that Clay requires. While Clay aggregates data from multiple sources and offers automation capabilities, it demands significant configuration time and relies on third-party data freshness. Derrick streamlines the entire process directly in your spreadsheet with built-in AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits, and no credit card needed for the free tier, making it faster to deploy and more cost-effective for teams prioritizing simplicity and speed over complex integrations.

### Is Derrick a good alternative to Clay?

Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Clay, especially if you prioritize simplicity and speed over complexity. While Clay excels at aggregating multiple data sources, it requires significant setup time and can overwhelm non-technical teams. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex configurations, saving five to ten hours monthly. Both platforms offer strong email validation and data enrichment, but Derrick's integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT enables automated lead scoring and segmentation directly in your spreadsheet. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier make it more flexible for teams with variable prospecting volumes. For organizations seeking streamlined, accessible enrichment without technical overhead, Derrick delivers faster time-to-value.

### How does Clay pricing compare to Derrick?

Clay's pricing model operates on a credit-based system similar to Derrick, but with key differences in flexibility and value. Clay charges per enrichment action across its data sources, while Derrick offers more affordable entry points starting at zero dollars with two hundred credits and no credit card required. Derrick's credits roll over monthly, so unused credits don't disappear, giving you better budget control. For teams already using Google Sheets, Derrick eliminates expensive third-party tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator, potentially saving over a thousand euros annually while delivering comparable enrichment depth with integrated AI capabilities for scoring and segmentation.

### Can Derrick replace Clay for LinkedIn prospecting?

Derrick cannot be a direct one-to-one replacement for Clay for LinkedIn prospecting, but it can cover the core needs more simply and cost-effectively. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports, and it offers real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, plus AI-driven scoring and segmentation. While Clay provides robust data enrichment from multiple sources and built-in outbound automation, Derrick emphasizes speed, ease of use, and budget flexibility with monthly rollovers and a free tier. For teams prioritizing simplicity, speed, and Google Sheets-centric workflows, Derrick can replace Clay for LinkedIn prospecting workflows, though users should validate data depth and multi-source enrichment needs on a case-by-case basis.

### Which tool is better for small teams: Derrick or Clay?

For small teams, Derrick offers a streamlined advantage over Clay. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports, which saves five to ten hours monthly. It includes real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. Clay excels at high-volume prospecting but demands more technical expertise and workflow configuration. For resource-constrained teams prioritizing speed and simplicity, Derrick's direct-in-spreadsheet approach delivers faster time-to-value with lower friction.

### What are Clay’s main features and advantages?

Clay’s main features center on real-time data enrichment and outbound automation. It pulls data from multiple sources (web scraping, API integrations, and third-party databases) into one interface, offers a visual no-code workflow builder for multi-step prospecting sequences, and provides strong email validation and company intelligence. Its native integrations with sales tools like HubSpot and Salesforce help deploy lists quickly. The key advantages include speed in building targeted lists, flexible data sourcing, and transparent data provenance. For those prioritizing simplicity and speed, Derrick offers a more streamlined alternative with 100% native Google Sheets, no complex setup, and credits that roll over, making it easier to start and scale without heavy configuration.