# Clay Vs Prospeo : Comparaison

> **TL;DR** Compare Clay vs Prospeo  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/clay-vs-prospeo-vs-derrick-app*

---

## Why choose Derrick against Clay Or Prospeo

### Save time with native Google Sheets enrichment without complex setup
Clay and Prospeo require separate setups or less native Google Sheets integration, slowing time-to-value. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with no complex configuration, so teams skip exporting data or wrestling with adapters. This directly saves 5-10 hours per month by turning Sheets into a full prospecting hub without leaving the sheet. Use-case: enrich 50+ attributes per contact inside Sheets in real time, with credits carryover and instant validation.

### Real-time data quality without complex validations for scale
Clay and Prospeo struggle to deliver consistent real-time data quality at scale without prone-to-break validations. Derrick provides real-time data quality directly within 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating complex validation setups and ensuring up-to-date accuracy. Teams save time and reduce rework, with measurable improvements in hit rates and deliverability as data stays validated on the fly. Derrick’s platform enforces continuous, scalable validation across 50+ attributes per contact, avoiding the pitfalls of inconsistent sources.

### Rapid, reputational impact with effortless data deduplication
Clay and Prospeo often struggle with deduplication at scale, leaving teams juggling multiple sources and risking inconsistent records. Derrick delivers effortless, native Google Sheets deduplication that cleanses and consolidates contacts in real time, without complex syncs or exports. This leads to rapid reputational impact: fewer duplicate emails, higher deliverability, and cleaner lists that reflect accurate company and contact details. For practical use, Derrick automatically flags duplicates as you work, saving hours per month and reducing campaign bounce rates.

## Comparison: Clay vs Prospeo

|  | [Clay](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-clay-2/) | Derrick App | [Prospeo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-prospeo-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 149$/mois | 9€/mois | 27$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Clay vs Prospeo vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

### Clay Pricing (real-time enrichment strength)
Clay offers real-time data enrichment with flexible outbound automation, with pricing info typically shown on a dedicated pricing page and paid tiers starting after the free or entry plan. See the full pricing breakdown for complete details and options.
[Visit pricing](https://derrick-app.com/en/pricing-clay-2/)

### Derrick App
Results first. Complexity removed. Native Google Sheets workflow, 100+ data points, AI-powered scoring, €9/month entry plan, 100 free credits.
[Discover Derrick](https://derrick-app.com/)

### Prospeo Pricing (real-time enrichment strength)
Prospeo offers a flexible pricing model with credits-based plans beginning at a low entry point, plus a free tier for limited use; the pricing page provides a full breakdown of all tiers and credits. See full pricing breakdown for complete details.
[Visit pricing](https://derrick-app.com/en/pricing-prospeo-2/)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Derrick vs Clay: which is better for speed and simplicity?
Derrick prioritizes speed and simplicity with its native Google Sheets integration, eliminating the need for CSV exports or external platforms that slow down Clay's workflow. While Clay offers powerful automation capabilities, it demands significant setup time and technical expertise to configure complex enrichment sequences. Derrick delivers real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes directly within Sheets with minimal friction, making it ideal for teams valuing immediate productivity over extensive customization. For straightforward prospecting workflows, Derrick's streamlined approach gets you prospecting faster than Clay's steeper learning curve.

### Is Derrick a good alternative to Clay for enrichment?
Yes, Derrick is an excellent alternative to Clay for enrichment, especially if you prioritize simplicity and speed. While Clay excels at workflow automation and requires significant setup time, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets with zero configuration needed, saving five to ten hours monthly. Both platforms offer real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes, but Derrick's integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT enables automatic scoring and segmentation without leaving your spreadsheet. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility than Clay's structure, making it ideal for teams seeking streamlined enrichment without complex integrations.

### Derrick vs Clay vs Prospeo: which offers better pricing?
Pricing varies significantly across all three platforms. Clay operates on a custom pricing model requiring direct contact for quotes, making it difficult to compare upfront costs. Prospeo uses a credit-based system starting around $99 monthly for entry-level plans. Derrick offers the most transparent and flexible pricing, starting free with 100 credits and scaling from $9 to $175 monthly with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier. Derrick's monthly credit rollover and lower entry price point make it particularly cost-effective for teams with variable prospecting volumes, while Clay and Prospeo may require higher commitments for comparable enrichment capabilities.

### How does Derrick compare to Prospeo for email validation?
Derrick compares favorably to Prospeo for email validation in a few practical ways. Derrick delivers real-time email validation integrated directly into Google Sheets, which means you can validate addresses as you build or enrich lists without exporting data or leaving your workflow. Prospeo emphasizes high-accuracy email discovery and verification, but it operates as a standalone email finder with broader enrichment needs rather than a native, sheet-based workspace. Derrick’s strengths include 100% native Google Sheets usage, flexible credits that roll over, and integrated AI scoring and segmentation, all while avoiding the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator. For teams prioritizing streamlined validation within their existing sheet-based processes and seeking cost-efficient, scalable credits with no credit card required for the free tier, Derrick often offers a more convenient, end-to-end experience compared to Prospeo.

### Which is the difference between Derrick and Prospeo in features?
Derrick and Prospeo differ significantly in their core approach and feature depth. Prospeo specializes primarily in email finding and verification with a 98% accuracy rate, making it ideal for teams focused on contact discovery. Derrick, however, operates natively within Google Sheets and offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact alongside real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and 3000+ automation integrations. While Prospeo excels at email accuracy, Derrick provides a more comprehensive enrichment platform that eliminates external tools, CSV exports, and complex setup, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier.

### Can Derrick replace both Clay and Prospeo for SMBs?
Derrick cannot literally replace Clay and Prospeo for every SMB scenario, but it can cover the core SMB needs more simply and cost-effectively in many cases. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets, offering real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, AI scoring and segmentation, and extensive automation through 3000+ integrations, all without CSV exports or complex setup. Clay excels at multi-source data enrichment and complex workflows, while Prospeo specializes in high-accuracy email discovery. For SMBs prioritizing speed, ease, and cost efficiency, Derrick can handle prospect enrichment, email validation, and basic outreach workflows well, while you may still pair it with dedicated tools if you require niche data depth or advanced buyer-intent signals. In short, Derrick can replace many daily tasks of both Clay and Prospeo for SMBs, but depending on your exact needs (deep enrichment versus precise email discovery at scale), a combined approach might still be optimal.