# Cognism Vs Dux-Soup : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Cognism offers enterprise-grade B2B contact data with compliance focus but requires dedicated budget and onboarding. Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn prospecting directly in the browser yet depends heavily on LinkedIn's ecosystem and rate limits. Derrick enriches prospect data natively inside Google Sheets starting at €9 per month with real-time email verification and 100+ data points, eliminating CSV exports and tool switching for teams who live in spreadsheets and need fast, verified contact data without enterprise complexity.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/cognism-vs-dux-soup-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Cognism vs Dux-Soup  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Cognism vs Dux-Soup vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab33d4652674e0078908c_69453634e4bbe42f75997e5c_image_1766143540023.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Cognism Or Dux-Soup

### Save time with native Google Sheets enrichment without CSV exports

Cognism and Dux-Soup can require additional steps or tools to achieve native Google Sheets enrichment, often relying on CSV exports or LinkedIn-centric data flows that force extra handoffs. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment without CSV exports, eliminating export bottlenecks and complex integrations. This directly saves time and reduces manual data transfer, enabling faster prospecting right inside Sheets. For quick wins, Derrick turns Sheets into a complete prospecting hub with 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation, all without leaving the sheet.

### Real-time email verification improves deliverability reliability

Real-time email verification is a critical gap for Cognism and Dux-Soup, which often rely on static contact data and can deliver outdated or unverified emails during high-velocity outreach. Derrick fixes this by delivering instant email validation within every prospect record, directly in 100% native Google Sheets, without exporting or external tools. This real-time verification translates to tangible deliverability gains and lower bounce rates, helping teams hit their inboxes consistently; users report up to a noticeable improvement in outreach reliability month over month. For fast, scalable prospecting, Derrick keeps your sender reputation intact while Cognism and Dux-Soup struggle to maintain up-to-date verification in real time.

### Unified data enrichment and action: no tool silos anymore

Cognism and Dux-Soup excel at isolated data or LinkedIn-driven workflows, but they can create silos where enrichment ends once data leaves their native environments. Derrick unifies data enrichment and action directly in 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating tool silos and manual exports. By offering 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and seamless multi-source integration, Derrick delivers actionable profiles without leaving Sheets, saving up to 5-10 hours per month. This approach enables immediate prospect actions—segmentation, scoring, and outreach—within a single workspace.

## Cognism vs Dux-Soup vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Cognism](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-cognism-2/) | Derrick App | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 1000$/mois | 9€/mois | 11.25$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and Cognism for pricing?

Derrick offers transparent, flexible pricing with monthly rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, starting at just 9 euros for 4,000 credits. Cognism positions itself as a premium enterprise solution with higher costs focused primarily on contact data verification and intent signals. Derrick differentiates by combining affordable pricing with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI capabilities within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for separate tools or expensive LinkedIn subscriptions. This makes Derrick more cost-effective for teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without enterprise-level pricing commitments.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Cognism for teams?

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to Cognism depends on your team's specific needs. Cognism excels at verified B2B contact data and intent signals, particularly for enterprise teams prioritizing data accuracy and EMEA coverage. However, Derrick offers distinct advantages if your team works primarily in Google Sheets and values operational simplicity. Derrick eliminates manual exports, integrates directly into your existing workflow without complex setup, and includes AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT at a significantly lower cost. Cognism requires external platform access, while Derrick's native Google Sheets approach saves five to ten hours monthly. If your team needs deep intent intelligence and European market expertise, Cognism remains strong. If you prioritize workflow efficiency, affordability, and built-in AI automation, Derrick delivers superior value. Many teams use both complementarily for different use cases.

### How do Derrick and Cognism compare on features and use cases?

Derrick and Cognism serve different prospecting needs within the B2B sales stack. Cognism excels as a dedicated lead intelligence platform with verified contact data and intent signals, particularly strong in EMEA markets, but requires external platforms and manual data export workflows. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating export friction and technical setup while offering real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and integrated AI scoring through Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier make it more flexible for teams prioritizing seamless workflow integration and cost efficiency, whereas Cognism suits organizations specifically needing premium data verification at enterprise scale.

### Which is cheaper: Derrick vs Cognism pricing plans?

Derrick is typically cheaper when you compare pricing plans directly to Cognism, especially for teams focused on inbound enrichment and Google Sheets-based prospecting. Cognism operates as a premium B2B data and intent platform with higher ongoing costs, while Derrick offers a transparent tiered credits model: Free 200 credits, Small 4000 credits for $9, Medium 10000 for $20, Large 25000 for $47.50, and XL 100000 for $175, with credits rollovers and no credit card required for the free tier. If your priority is affordable, scalable enrichment without enterprise-level data overhead, Derrick generally covers essential fields (50+ attributes per contact) and real-time email validation at a lower price point. Cognism excels in enterprise-grade data accuracy, GDPR/CCPA compliance, and robust intent signals, but at a higher price.

### Does Cognism offer a better review than Derrick among users?

Cognism and Derrick serve different prospecting priorities, so user reviews reflect distinct use cases rather than one being universally better. Cognism excels at verified B2B contact data and EMEA market coverage, earning strong reviews for data accuracy. However, Derrick users appreciate its native Google Sheets integration, which eliminates CSV exports and saves five to ten hours monthly. Derrick also offers AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, rollover credits, and no credit card requirement for the free tier, making it more accessible for teams prioritizing workflow efficiency and cost flexibility over premium data verification alone.

### Can Derrick replace both Cognism and Dux-Soup in a workflow?

Yes, Derrick can replace some of the workflow steps typically handled by Cognism and Dux-Soup, but not every capability of both tools in a single, end-to-end way. Derrick excels as a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment and prospecting hub with real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and extensive integrations, which covers data quality, enrichment, and outbound workflow within Sheets. Cognism specializes in high-quality contact data, firmographics, intent signals, and GDPR/CCPA-compliant outreach, while Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn automation and engagement at scale. So, Derrick can streamline data enrichment, lead scoring, and multi-channel outreach in one place, potentially reducing the need for separate Cognism or Dux-Soup steps for some teams—but for advanced account-based marketing with robust intent signals (Cognism) or LinkedIn-centric automation depth (Dux-Soup), users may still complement Derrick with specialized tools. The choice depends on the exact mix of data depth, compliance, and multi-channel tactics your workflow requires.