# Dux-Soup Vs Captain Data : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn profile scraping and connection workflows with chrome extension tools, ideal for LinkedIn-focused prospecting but requiring browser-based operation. Captain Data offers multi-channel prospecting workflows across LinkedIn and web sources, though enrichment depth beyond LinkedIn can be limited. Derrick provides native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ data attributes per contact, no LinkedIn dependency, and real-time email verification, starting at €9 monthly with credit rollover, best for teams prioritizing spreadsheet-native workflows and multi-source data accuracy.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/dux-soup-vs-captain-data-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Dux-Soup vs Captain Data  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Dux-Soup vs Captain Data vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab3a6d227a7bb05290fa6_694536e4c2852edc7fb56d19_image_1766143716373.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Dux-Soup Or Captain Data

### Save time with native Google Sheets enrichment without LinkedIn dependency

Dux-Soup and Captain Data focus on LinkedIn-based prospecting, but they require leaving LinkedIn or relying on limited enrichment sources, which adds steps and risk. Derrick delivers native Google Sheets enrichment with no LinkedIn dependency, transforming Sheets into a complete prospecting hub. Users save 5-10 hours per month by avoiding manual data transfers and external tools, and can leverage 50+ enrichment attributes directly inside Sheets. A quick use case: validate emails in real time while updating contact records without leaving Google Sheets.

### Automated multi-channel enrichment beyond LinkedIn limitations

Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn automation and profile scraping, while Captain Data emphasizes multi-channel prospecting but often relies on LinkedIn data and can struggle with deeper enrichment beyond that source. Derrick differs by providing automated multi-channel enrichment that goes beyond LinkedIn limitations, integrating emails, phones, and social data within a native Google Sheets workflow. This results in faster, scalable enrichment across 50+ attributes per contact and real-time validation, reducing manual verification and boosting deliverability. Use cases include building complete, up-to-date prospect profiles directly in Derrick without leaving Sheets, cutting time-to-value for multi-channel outreach.

### Real-time data validation with universal accuracy across sources

Dux-Soup and Captain Data rely on LinkedIn- or web-scraped data that can become stale or incomplete for real-time validation, often lacking universal accuracy across sources. Derrick delivers real-time data validation with cross-source verification, ensuring consistency beyond LinkedIn-only enrichment. Users gain measurable reliability: up-to-date contact and company attributes across 50+ fields with instant email verification, reducing bounce and miswhy by up to 20-30%. A practical use case is on-the-fly lead validation during multi-channel outreach, powered by Derrick’s native Google Sheets integration.

## Dux-Soup vs Captain Data vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) | Derrick App | [Captain Data](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-captain-data-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 11.25$/mois | 9€/mois | 399$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Which Derrick vs Dux-Soup question best covers pricing differences?

The most relevant comparison for pricing differences centers on Derrick's credit-based model versus Dux-Soup's subscription tiers. Derrick offers rollover credits with no upfront card required, starting at zero dollars with 200 free credits, while Dux-Soup operates on fixed monthly plans tied to LinkedIn automation capacity. Derrick's transparent per-credit pricing scales efficiently for variable usage, whereas Dux-Soup's structure locks teams into recurring costs regardless of monthly activity levels. This makes Derrick substantially more cost-effective for teams with fluctuating prospecting needs.

### Is Derrick a better Dux-Soup alternative for LinkedIn outreach?

Derrick functions as a more integrated alternative to Dux-Soup by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for separate platforms and CSV exports that consume valuable time. While Dux-Soup specializes purely in LinkedIn automation, Derrick combines LinkedIn enrichment with 50+ contact and company attributes, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring capabilities using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick also eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving approximately 1200 dollars annually, and offers rollover credits with no card required for the free tier, providing greater flexibility and cost efficiency for teams seeking comprehensive prospecting without automation compliance risks.

### How does Derrick compare to Captain Data in features and use cases?

Derrick differs from Captain Data primarily in its approach and integration model. While Captain Data focuses on LinkedIn-based prospecting with web scraping capabilities, Derrick operates as a 100% native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or external tools. Derrick offers deeper enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and real-time email validation without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Captain Data excels at LinkedIn automation but has limitations with non-LinkedIn data enrichment and batch processing at scale. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for free tier provide greater flexibility for teams with variable prospecting needs.

### What’s the Derrick vs Dux-Soup vs Captain Data pricing difference?

Derrick pricing differs from Dux-Soup and Captain Data in a few clear ways. Derrick operates on a credits-based model tied to a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, with free tier credits and scalable paid plans: Free 100 credits, Small 4000 credits for $9, Medium 10,000 credits for $20, Large 25,000 credits for $47.50, and XL 100,000 credits for $175, with credits rollovers and no credit card required for the free tier. Dux-Soup uses LinkedIn automation pricing tied to its plan tiers, while Captain Data charges for web scraping/data extraction capabilities with its own plan structure and data volume limits. Derrick emphasizes native enrichment (50+ attributes per contact/company, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring/segmentation, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations) without LinkedIn dependency, which can translate to lower total cost of ownership and fewer platform-related compliance considerations compared to the others.

### Does Dux-Soup outperform Derrick on automation reliability?

Both Dux-Soup and Derrick handle automation reliably, but they serve different purposes. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation with strong compliance mechanisms that reduce account risk, making it dependable for LinkedIn-focused outreach. However, Dux-Soup occasionally experiences data synchronization delays with large contact batches. Derrick excels in data enrichment automation within Google Sheets, offering real-time email validation and seamless integrations without LinkedIn dependency. For comprehensive prospect management combining automation reliability with enrichment depth, Derrick provides a more robust foundation that minimizes the compliance risks associated with LinkedIn automation tools.

### Can Derrick replace both Dux-Soup and Captain Data for data enrichment?

Derrick can handle data enrichment, but it’s not a one-for-one replacement for both Dux-Soup and Captain Data in all scenarios. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn-based automation and prospecting, whereas Captain Data focuses on web scraping and multi-channel enrichment. Derrick provides 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, AI-driven scoring, and broad integrations, all without LinkedIn dependencies. If your primary need is LinkedIn automation, Dux-Soup remains relevant; if you require extensive web-scraped enrichment, Captain Data adds value. Derrick complements both with a holistic, no-code data center.