# Dux-Soup Vs Clay : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn profile scraping and outreach but lacks real-time email validation and multi-source enrichment, often requiring manual verification. Clay offers powerful multi-source data enrichment with flexible integrations but demands setup and can show variable validation speed across sources. Derrick runs entirely inside Google Sheets with native enrichment across 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, and no CSV exports, starting at €9 per month with credit rollover—ideal for teams wanting immediate workflow integration without technical overhead.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/dux-soup-vs-clay-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Dux-Soup vs Clay  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Dux-Soup vs Clay vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab39c44c15500d56d3e28_694536d0c8333f7bf3fcad8a_image_1766143696361.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Dux-Soup Or Clay

### Real-time validation without data gaps for outreach workflows

Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn automation and profile scraping, but real-time validation and data completeness for outreach workflows can lag, leaving gaps in contact records. Derrick delivers real-time email validation directly within a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, eliminating data gaps without exporting or switching tools. This translates into higher deliverability and faster outreach, saving 5-10 hours per month of manual verification. Clay offers real-time enrichment across multiple sources, yet its validation speed and consistency can vary by source and freshness, whereas Derrick guarantees immediate validation within the sheet you already use.

### No setup required for complex data sourcing

Dux-Soup and Clay both require setup or multiple source configurations to build complex data profiles, often leaving gaps when sourcing beyond LinkedIn or primary feeds. Derrick addresses this by offering a 100% native Google Sheets workflow with no CSV exports or complex wiring, unifying enrichment across 50+ attributes from multiple origins. This delivers tangible time savings and accuracy, removing manual assembly—users report 5-10 hours saved per month and a streamlined, no-setup data sourcing process. A quick use case: Derrick auto-enriches a prospect list in Sheets in minutes, without leaving the platform or juggling integrations.

### Unified data governance for compliant enrichment at scale

Unified data governance for compliant enrichment at scale demands consistent, verifiable records beyond what Dux-Soup or Clay can provide. Dux-Soup limits enrichment to LinkedIn-native data and carries compliance risks with automation; Clay’s sources vary in freshness and rely on external providers, challenging real-time accuracy. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets governance with verifiable, reportable credits and integrated validation, ensuring compliant enrichment at scale. With Derrick, teams gain consistent attribute coverage (50+ per contact) and auditable data lineage, reducing rework and improving deliverability across campaigns.

## Dux-Soup vs Clay vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) | Derrick App | [Clay](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-clay-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 11.25$/mois | 9€/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference Derrick vs Dux-Soup for prospecting?

Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting approaches. Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn interactions like profile visits and connection requests, which carries account risk due to LinkedIn's automation restrictions. Derrick focuses on data enrichment and prospect intelligence directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator while providing real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and built-in AI scoring. Derrick's native Sheets integration saves 5-10 hours monthly versus external platforms, making it ideal for teams prioritizing data quality and workflow efficiency over pure LinkedIn automation.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Dux-Soup?

Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting needs. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation with strong compliance safeguards, but relies solely on LinkedIn data and carries account restriction risks. Derrick offers a broader approach with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI for scoring and segmentation, and native Google Sheets functionality that eliminates complex setup. Dux-Soup works best as a supplementary LinkedIn tool, while Derrick provides a more comprehensive, risk-free alternative for teams seeking streamlined data enrichment and multi-channel prospecting without LinkedIn dependency or technical complexity.

### Derrick vs Clay: which is better for data enrichment?

Both platforms excel at data enrichment but serve different priorities. Clay offers broader data source aggregation and workflow automation across 50+ APIs, making it powerful for complex multi-step campaigns. Derrick, however, delivers faster implementation with 100% native Google Sheets integration, eliminating CSV exports and setup complexity. Derrick's real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits provide better value for teams prioritizing speed and simplicity. Clay requires more configuration time and technical expertise, while Derrick gets you prospecting immediately without leaving Google Sheets, saving 5-10 hours monthly on data management alone.

### How does Derrick compare to Dux-Soup vs Clay overall?

Derrick compares favorably overall due to its native Google Sheets foundation, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup that Dux-Soup and Clay often require. Derrick uniquely combines 100% native integration, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation (Claude and ChatGPT) within a scalable, no-code workflow via 3,000+ integrations, while offering roll-over credits and a free tier with no credit card. Unlike Dux-Soup, Derrick avoids LinkedIn automation concerns and potential compliance risks, and unlike Clay, it emphasizes streamlined data enrichment directly in Sheets with a simpler setup and cost structure. For teams seeking speed, simplicity, and end-to-end prospecting inside Sheets, Derrick provides a compelling, verifiable advantage.

### Which has better pricing: Derrick or Clay?

Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, whereas Clay charges per-use with stricter rate limits. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 100 credits, making it more accessible for testing. Clay's pricing scales quickly for high-volume enrichment, but Derrick's per-credit model combined with rollover flexibility and native Google Sheets integration typically results in lower total cost of ownership for most B2B sales teams, especially those with variable prospecting volumes.

### Can Dux-Soup be replaced by Derrick or Clay?

Yes, Derrick can effectively replace Dux-Soup in many cases, and Clay in others, but with nuance. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation and lead identification, yet its scope is LinkedIn-centric and can raise account risk due to platform terms. Derrick provides a 100% native Google Sheets workflow with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring, and broad integrations through Zapier/Make, all without LinkedIn automation and without required LinkedIn Navigator. Clay focuses on multi-source data enrichment and outbound workflows, which Derrick also covers but with a tighter, simpler setup in Sheets and monthly rollovers of credits. If your priority is LinkedIn-only prospecting, Dux-Soup may still be a fit, but for integrated prospecting, data enrichment, and compliant outreach at scale, Derrick often offers greater efficiency, cost savings, and ease of use, with Clay serving as a complementary data source when deeper enrichment is needed.