# Dux-Soup Vs Evaboot : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn prospecting with profile visits and connection requests, ideal for teams comfortable with LinkedIn's automation limits and manual export workflows. Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator list exports with email enrichment, suited for users who need clean CSV files from saved searches. Derrick enriches contacts natively inside Google Sheets with 50+ data points per lead, real-time email validation, and monthly credit rollover starting at €9, eliminating CSV imports and LinkedIn scraping constraints for teams prioritizing workflow simplicity.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/dux-soup-vs-evaboot-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Dux-Soup vs Evaboot  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Dux-Soup vs Evaboot vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab39b0f0dc4343f1006ea_694535f867f2e7f65e113a87_image_1766143479839.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Dux-Soup Or Evaboot

### Real-time validation and enrichment without LinkedIn limits

Dux-Soup and Evaboot rely on LinkedIn-restricted data and manual validation gaps, which limit real-time enrichment without hitting LinkedIn limits. Derrick delivers real-time validation and enrichment natively inside Google Sheets, without LinkedIn constraints or CSV exports. This translates to immediate, verifiable contact data and up-to-date firmographic attributes, reducing bounce rates and saving time. For example, Derrick’s real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact enable faster qualification and a smoother multi-step outreach workflow. No LinkedIn caps, no data handoffs—just continuous, actionable intelligence in your worksheet.

### Automated multi-source enrichment for deeper insights

Dux-Soup and Evaboot rely primarily on LinkedIn or limited sources for enrichment, leaving gaps in multi-source context and deeper firmographic insights. Derrick delivers automated, multi-source enrichment directly within 100% native Google Sheets, aggregating data beyond LinkedIn without exporting or complex setup. This approach yields tangible results: up to 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and faster, more complete profiles, reducing manual research time by 5-10 hours per month. A practical use case is instant enrichment of a contact’s company tech stack and similarWeb insights alongside email validation, enabling deeper insight without switching tools.

### Unified data governance for compliant outreach and scaling

Dux-Soup and Evaboot struggle with unified data governance beyond LinkedIn-centric or domain-specific sources, leaving gaps in compliant outreach and scalable workflows. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets data governance with centralized enrichment, validation, and auditable records, without relying on LinkedIn automation risks. This translates to measurable gains: up to a 20% faster scale cycle and monthly credit carryover that preserves workflow continuity, while ensuring compliance-driven outreach through consistent data standards. With Derrick, teams can standardize 50+ attributes per contact and apply real-time email validation across the entire pipeline, enabling compliant multi-channel outreach at scale.

## Dux-Soup vs Evaboot vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) | Derrick App | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 11.25$/mois | 9€/mois | 39$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference Derrick vs Dux-Soup for LinkedIn outreach?

The main difference lies in their core approach to LinkedIn outreach. Dux-Soup is a pure LinkedIn automation tool that handles profile visits, connection requests, and message sequences directly on the platform, making it effective for high-volume LinkedIn-native campaigns. However, Derrick takes a different angle by enriching your prospect data directly in Google Sheets without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator or complex automation setup. Dux-Soup focuses on automation volume, while Derrick emphasizes data quality and enrichment accuracy with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI for scoring and segmentation. For teams wanting streamlined LinkedIn outreach without compliance risks, Derrick's enrichment-first approach paired with your existing workflows offers more flexibility and eliminates the need for multiple subscription layers.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for data enrichment?

Derrick offers a more streamlined approach to data enrichment compared to Evaboot, particularly for teams already using Google Sheets. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring, it requires external integrations and struggles with large-scale processing beyond 500K records. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes natively within Sheets, real-time email validation, and integrated AI capabilities using Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and free tier without credit card requirements offer greater flexibility and cost efficiency than Evaboot's unpredictable scaling model, making it the better choice for teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without technical overhead.

### Which is Derrick vs Dux-Soup vs Evaboot: the three-way comparison?

Derrick, Dux-Soup, and Evaboot serve different prospecting needs. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation for connection requests and outreach sequences, while Evaboot focuses on lead scoring and qualification workflows. Derrick stands apart as a Google Sheets native platform offering comprehensive data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, AI-powered scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits. Unlike Dux-Soup's automation compliance risks or Evaboot's integration limitations, Derrick eliminates LinkedIn dependencies, saves thousands annually on subscriptions, and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it ideal for teams prioritizing data quality and workflow efficiency without external platform complexity.

### Dux-Soup vs Evaboot which has better pricing and value?

Dux-Soup and Evaboot both offer solid pricing structures for their core use cases, but Derrick typically delivers better overall value for B2B prospecting and data enrichment when you account for native Google Sheets integration, AI-powered scoring, and flexible credit-based pricing. Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn automation with data scraping, which can carry account risk and often requires a secondary enrichment solution for depth. Evaboot provides straightforward data quality and lead scoring but lacks the depth of native enrichment and enterprise-scale customization. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets, over 50 enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and a generous, roll-over credits model with a free tier—all without needing a credit card for the free option. If your priorities are integrated prospecting, robust enrichment, and cost predictability, Derrick generally offers better value.

### Does Derrick review favor it over Dux-Soup for teams?

Derrick reviews generally favor it over Dux-Soup for teams seeking a more integrated, hassle-free approach to prospect management. While Dux-Soup excels specifically at LinkedIn automation, it carries compliance risks and requires careful configuration. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without LinkedIn dependency, offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI for scoring and segmentation. For teams wanting comprehensive data enrichment combined with workflow automation in a single platform, Derrick eliminates the need for multiple tools while maintaining flexibility through rollover credits and no upfront payment requirements.

### How does Derrick pricing compare to Dux-Soup and Evaboot?

Derrick pricing compares quite favorably when stacked against Dux-Soup and Evaboot, especially for teams already using Google Sheets. Derrick offers a transparent credit-based model: Free 100 credits, Small 4000 credits for $9, Medium 10000 for $20, Large 25000 for $47.50, and XL 100000 for $175, with credits roll-over and no credit card required for the free tier. In contrast, Dux-Soup and Evaboot typically price by plan with varying data enrichment and workflow capabilities. Derrick's 100% native Sheets integration and real-time email validation add long-term cost efficiency and ease of use.