# Dux-Soup Vs Leadfeeder : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn prospecting with profile visits and messaging sequences, best for teams already using Sales Navigator who need LinkedIn-specific workflows. Leadfeeder identifies anonymous website visitors by matching IP addresses to company databases, ideal for inbound marketing teams tracking web traffic. Derrick enriches leads natively inside Google Sheets with 50+ data points and real-time email validation at €9 per month, suited for sales teams wanting spreadsheet-based enrichment without LinkedIn dependence or complex tooling.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/dux-soup-vs-leadfeeder-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Dux-Soup vs Leadfeeder  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Dux-Soup vs Leadfeeder vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab33e196281a2ea50b114_6945351fc2852edc7fb517de_image_1766143262978.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Dux-Soup Or Leadfeeder

### Get complete leads without LinkedIn reliance

Dux-Soup and Leadfeeder mainly rely on LinkedIn or website visitor tracking to generate leads, which leaves gaps in complete prospect profiles when LinkedIn data is unavailable or insufficient. Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets experience that enriches leads without needing LinkedIn, providing 50+ attributes per contact and real-time email validation to ensure completeness. This translates to measurable efficiency: save 5-10 hours per month and reduce data gaps, enabling faster outreach with ready-to-use lead records. For quick practicality, teams can start enriching a full pipeline directly in Sheets without CSV exports or complex setup.

### Automated, real-time email validation for every lead

Dux-Soup and Leadfeeder don’t provide automated, real-time email validation for every lead, leaving email deliverability questions unanswered as you scale outreach. Derrick handles this by performing real-time email validation within the 100% native Google Sheets workflow, ensuring each lead is validated before you reach out. This results in improved deliverability and reduced bounce waste, translating to measurable time and cost savings for your campaigns. With Derrick, you can validate emails on the fly as you enrich 50+ attributes, accelerating reliable outreach directly from Sheets.

### Unified data platform: single source of truth for enrichment

Dux-Soup and Leadfeeder excel at surface-level lead discovery, but they don’t provide a unified data platform with a single source of truth for enrichment. Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment layer, consolidating 50+ attributes and real-time validation into one consistent dataset without exporting or multiple tools. This reduces data gaps and duplications, saving up to 5-10 hours per month and aligning every lead with verifiable firmographic and contact details. With Derrick, your enrichment remains centralized, auditable, and readily actionable for faster outreach.

## Dux-Soup vs Leadfeeder vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) | Derrick App | [Leadfeeder](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-leadfeeder-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 11.25$/mois | 9€/mois | 99$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and Dux-Soup?

Derrick and Dux-Soup serve different prospecting needs. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation, automating connection requests and outreach sequences directly on the platform. Derrick, however, is a native Google Sheets data enrichment platform that enriches prospect and company data with 50+ attributes, email validation, and integrated AI scoring without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator. While Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn engagement automation, Derrick provides comprehensive data intelligence and seamless workflow integration directly where your lists live, eliminating manual exports and reducing setup complexity.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Leadfeeder?

Derrick and Leadfeeder serve different prospecting needs. Leadfeeder excels at identifying anonymous website visitors and revealing company intent through behavioral tracking, making it ideal if your primary goal is understanding who visits your site. However, Derrick offers broader data enrichment capabilities directly within Google Sheets, providing 50+ contact and company attributes without external platforms or complex integrations. While Leadfeeder focuses on visitor identification, Derrick combines enrichment, AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and email validation—all natively in Sheets. Choose Leadfeeder for pure website intelligence; choose Derrick for comprehensive, flexible prospecting workflows without the setup complexity or recurring platform costs.

### Which is Derrick vs Dux-Soup vs Leadfeeder for pricing?

Derrick offers flexible pay-as-you-go pricing starting at zero dollars with two hundred credits and no credit card required, making it accessible for startups testing lead generation workflows. Dux-Soup operates on subscription-based plans focused exclusively on LinkedIn automation, while Leadfeeder charges based on website traffic volume and identified accounts. Derrick's rollover credits and transparent per-contact pricing provide better cost predictability than Dux-Soup's fixed plans or Leadfeeder's usage-based model. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick eliminates the need for separate LinkedIn Navigator subscriptions, saving approximately twelve hundred euros annually while delivering fifty-plus enrichment attributes directly within Google Sheets without complex integrations or CSV exports.

### How does Derrick compare to Dux-Soup for review quality?

Derrick offers a different paradigm for review quality compared to Dux-Soup. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn-based lead identification and outreach automation, delivering strong data capture from profiles and actionable engagement signals, but its data enrichment is largely LinkedIn-centric and can require additional tools for deeper firmographic or technographic insight. Derrick, by contrast, provides 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, all without CSV exports or complex configurations. For reviewers prioritizing data completeness, reliability, and integrative scoring within a familiar Google Sheets workspace, Derrick often yields more consistent, verifiable prospect profiles, while Dux-Soup shines for rapid LinkedIn-led outreach. Overall, Derrick’s review quality benefits from richer enrichment and governance, whereas Dux-Soup’s strength is operational efficiency in LinkedIn outreach.

### Can Derrick replace both Dux-Soup and Leadfeeder in pricing?

Derrick can effectively replace both Dux-Soup and Leadfeeder depending on your priorities. Unlike Dux-Soup's LinkedIn-only automation, Derrick enriches prospects directly in Google Sheets with 50+ data attributes without compliance risks. While Leadfeeder identifies website visitors, Derrick provides deeper firmographic enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. At just 9-20€ monthly with rollover credits and no card required, Derrick costs significantly less than both tools combined, offering a more unified, flexible prospecting platform without the limitations of single-channel solutions.

### What are Derrick’s features vs Dux-Soup and Leadfeeder?

Derrick uniquely combines 100% native Google Sheets data enrichment with powerful prospecting capabilities, without CSV exports or complex setup. Unlike Dux-Soup, Derrick doesn’t rely on LinkedIn automation, reducing account risk and compliance concerns while still delivering deep enrichment (50+ attributes per contact/company) and real-time email validation for deliverability. Compared to Leadfeeder, Derrick provides end-to-end enrichment and scoring directly inside Sheets, plus AI-powered segmentation and summaries, with monthly credit rollovers and multiple integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. Derrick also offers a free tier with 200 credits and no credit card required, while Dux-Soup and Leadfeeder emphasize website or CRM-oriented workflows rather than an entirely embedded data-prospecting center.