# Dux-Soup Vs Phantombuster : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn outreach and connection requests with browser-based scraping, best for small teams prioritizing LinkedIn-only prospecting but lacking real-time email validation. PhantomBuster offers broader automation across multiple platforms with cloud-based scraping and API workflows, ideal for technical users comfortable with external integrations but facing setup complexity. Derrick operates natively inside Google Sheets with real-time validation across 100+ enrichment data points and credit rollover from €9 per month, suited for teams wanting zero-setup enrichment without switching tools.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/dux-soup-vs-phantombuster-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Dux-Soup vs PhantomBuster  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Dux-Soup vs PhantomBuster vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2a579b48fe5a3b15012_6945349d798e29fd564cd30d_image_1766143133069.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Dux-Soup Or Phantombuster

### Real-time validation eliminate guessing without manual checks

Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster let you scrape and automate outreach, but they struggle with real-time validation and live email/phone accuracy, risking invalid contacts slipping through without manual checks. Derrick, by contrast, integrates real-time validation directly into 100% native Google Sheets workflows, eliminating guesswork as you prospect. This saves measurable time and reduces bounce risk; users typically see a 20–40% improvement in valid contact rates and lower outreach rework. A quick use-case: verify emails on the fly as you build sequences, ensuring each touchpoint is directed at a deliverable contact.

### Scalable enrichment across 3000+ integrations without extra tools

Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster both struggle to deliver scalable enrichment across 3000+ integrations without external tools, often relying on LinkedIn-only data or external scrapes that miss breadth. Derrick differentiates by native Google Sheets enrichment with 3000+ integrations through Zapier/Make/n8n, eliminating the need for additional tools. Users gain measurable efficiency: up to 10% faster prospect profiling and standardized enrichment across diverse data sources, plus single-click data consolidation in Sheets. A typical use case: enrich a company profile across multiple services in one pass, then instantly segment with AI scoring.

### Unified data quality across multi-source signals for reliable insights

Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster rely on multi-source scraping without a unified, verifiable data quality layer, which can leave gaps in accuracy when combining LinkedIn, web data, and other signals. Derrick ingests 3,000+ integrations natively and harmonizes data across sources inside Google Sheets, delivering consistent records and real-time validation. Teams gain reliable insights with reduced bounce and reconciliation time, thanks to single-source truth and limiters on duplicate or outdated fields. A quick use case: consolidate contact signals from LinkedIn, company websites, and tech stacks into one trusted profile for precise outreach.

## Dux-Soup vs PhantomBuster vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) | Derrick App | [PhantomBuster](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-phantombuster-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 11.25$/mois | 9€/mois | 69$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Is Derrick better than Dux-Soup for LinkedIn outreach? Which is the better alternative to Dux-Soup: Derrick or PhantomBuster? Derrick vs Dux-Soup vs PhantomBuster: which offers more features? Dux-Soup vs PhantomBuster: which is the cheaper pricing option? What’s the difference between Derrick and Dux-Soup in review feedback? Can Derrick replace both Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster for pricing and features?

Derrick outperforms both Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster for comprehensive LinkedIn outreach because it operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring complex automation setup or external platforms. While Dux-Soup focuses exclusively on LinkedIn automation and PhantomBuster excels at data extraction, Derrick combines enrichment, email validation, and AI-powered segmentation directly in your spreadsheet. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving twelve hundred dollars annually, offers rollover credits for budget flexibility, and includes real-time email validation for superior deliverability. For teams seeking integrated prospecting without steep learning curves or compliance concerns, Derrick delivers more features at lower cost than managing multiple point solutions.

### Which is the better alternative to Dux-Soup: Derrick or PhantomBuster?

Both platforms offer distinct strengths, but the better choice depends on your specific needs. PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and automation workflows without coding, making it ideal if you need broad data extraction across multiple sources. However, Derrick provides deeper B2B enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring—all natively within Google Sheets without complex setup or CSV exports. If you prioritize data quality, seamless workflow integration, and cost-effectiveness with rollover credits, Derrick delivers superior value. For pure automation tasks, PhantomBuster remains competitive, but for comprehensive prospect intelligence, Derrick offers a more complete solution.

### Derrick vs Dux-Soup vs PhantomBuster: which offers more features?

Derrick, Dux-Soup, and PhantomBuster serve different purposes, so feature comparison depends on your workflow needs. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation with strong compliance safeguards, while PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and data extraction across multiple platforms. Derrick differentiates itself by offering comprehensive B2B data enrichment directly within Google Sheets with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and no complex setup required. Unlike competitors requiring external platforms or CSV exports, Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates manual data handling and saves 5-10 hours monthly. For teams seeking complete prospecting capabilities without LinkedIn Sales Navigator or third-party tools, Derrick delivers more integrated features within a single ecosystem.

### Dux-Soup vs PhantomBuster: which is the cheaper pricing option?

Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster pricing generally centers on usage volume and add-ons, with PhantomBuster often scaling with campaign breadth and data extraction tasks. In most cases, Dux-Soup tends to be cheaper for smaller, LinkedIn-focused outreach, while PhantomBuster can become more expensive as you scale, especially if you need broader scraping across multiple platforms. Derrick, by contrast, offers a transparent tiered credit system starting at zero-cost for the free tier and affordable small/medium plans, with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and native Google Sheets integration—delivering value without the per-task price creep common to strict automation tools. If your goal is cost-efficient, multi-channel prospecting with built-in enrichment and no platform exports, Derrick often provides a more economical and streamlined alternative.

### What’s the difference between Derrick and Dux-Soup in review feedback?

Derrick provides integrated review feedback directly within Google Sheets without requiring separate platforms or manual data exports, streamlining your workflow significantly. Unlike Dux-Soup, which focuses primarily on LinkedIn automation and relies on LinkedIn's native data for enrichment, Derrick combines 50+ enrichment attributes with real-time email validation and AI-powered insights using Claude and ChatGPT. This means you get comprehensive prospect intelligence alongside review data in one unified interface, eliminating context-switching and reducing manual verification time that Dux-Soup users typically encounter when enriching leads captured through automation.

### Can Derrick replace both Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster for pricing and features?

Derrick cannot fully replace both Dux-Soup and PhantomBuster for pricing and features, but it can cover core needs more holistically. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation and prospecting efficiency, while PhantomBuster excels at multi-source data extraction and pre-built templates. Derrick offers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and extensive integrations, all with a transparent credits-based model and no credit card required for the free tier. For teams needing deep multi-channel automation and data enrichment, using Derrick alongside specialized tools often delivers the best value.