# Dux-Soup Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation for profile visits and connection requests, best for teams heavily invested in LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Skrapp focuses on email finding from LinkedIn profiles and company domains, ideal for cold outreach at scale. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and rollover credits starting at €9 per month, suited for teams who manage prospect data in spreadsheets and need multi-source enrichment beyond LinkedIn alone.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/dux-soup-vs-skrapp-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Dux-Soup vs Skrapp  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Dux-Soup vs Skrapp vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2fe093c2c7a25b45c01_694534467a7dff00816ab7c8_image_1766143046256.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Dux-Soup Or Skrapp

### Real-time validation and enrichment without LinkedIn-only limits

Dux-Soup and Skrapp rely on LinkedIn-centric data, which creates real-time validation and enrichment gaps outside LinkedIn profiles and limits cross-source accuracy. Derrick delivers real-time validation and enrichment without LinkedIn-only constraints by leveraging 100% native Google Sheets workflows and multi-source data points, not just LinkedIn data. Teams can verify emails and fill 50+ attributes per contact in real time, reducing bounce and boosting deliverability, with credits that are fully reportable month to month. A quick use case: enrich a contact from a website with firmographic and technographic details instantly inside Sheets, without exporting or LinkedIn dependence.

### Smart, scalable data enrichment beyond LinkedIn with Derrick

Dux-Soup and Skrapp excel at LinkedIn-based prospecting, but their enrichment beyond LinkedIn remains limited, leaving gaps in firmographic and technographic context. Derrick delivers smart, scalable data enrichment that goes beyond LinkedIn with 50+ attributes per contact and AI-powered scoring, segmentation, and summaries. This translates into measurable efficiency: up to 5-10 hours saved per month and richer, ready-to-use profiles for multi-channel outreach. With real-time email validation and seamless Google Sheets native workflow, Derrick turns scattered data into actionable intelligence at scale.

### Unified data governance for compliant enrichment at scale

Dux-Soup and Skrapp primarily rely on LinkedIn-native data, whichcreates gaps in governance and non-compliant enrichment when scaling across multiple sources. Derrick delivers unified data governance by centralizing enrichment in a compliant framework within Google Sheets, eliminating platform-forced silos. Teams save time and reduce risk, achieving measurable improvements like up to 20% faster data maturation and 30% fewer data quality issues through real-time validation and consistent field mappings. A typical use case: consolidate company and contact records across sources with reportable monthly credits and no LinkedIn Navigator dependency.

## Dux-Soup vs Skrapp vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) | Derrick App | [Skrapp](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-skrapp-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 11.25$/mois | 9€/mois | 30$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs Dux-Soup difference for prospecting?

Derrick and Dux-Soup take fundamentally different approaches to prospecting. Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn interactions like connection requests and messages, which can pose compliance risks since LinkedIn restricts automation. Derrick, meanwhile, enriches prospect data directly in Google Sheets with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring without automation concerns. While Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn engagement volume, Derrick provides deeper prospect intelligence and verification, making outreach more targeted and effective. Derrick also eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams significant annual costs while maintaining full compliance.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Skrapp for teams?

Derrick serves teams differently than Skrapp by offering comprehensive data enrichment directly within Google Sheets rather than focusing solely on email extraction. While Skrapp excels at quick contact discovery, Derrick provides fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring capabilities without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator. For teams seeking a complete prospecting hub with monthly rollover credits and native spreadsheet workflows, Derrick eliminates the need for multiple tools and reduces manual data handling by five to ten hours monthly, making it a more integrated alternative for growing sales operations.

### Derrick vs Dux-Soup vs Skrapp: who wins on features?

The winner depends on your primary needs. Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation and compliance, Skrapp specializes in fast email extraction with high accuracy, while Derrick stands out for comprehensive data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and native Google Sheets functionality. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving significant costs annually, and offers rollover credits with no card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking all-in-one intelligence without platform switching or complex configurations.

### Which offers better pricing: Derrick or Dux-Soup?

Based on pricing structures, Derrick generally offers a more accessible and flexible model for B2B teams, especially with its free tier and monthly credit rollovers, which can be more cost-efficient than Dux-Soup’s plan-based approach that scales with automation features. Derrick’s pricing (Free 200 credits; Small 4000; Medium 10,000; Large 25,000; XL 100,000) paired with no credit card required for the free tier and the ability to repurpose credits across Tik, email, and enrichment workflows can reduce total cost of ownership. Dux-Soup pricing centers on tiered plans for automation, which can become pricier for high-volume campaigns, and its value is tightly bound to LinkedIn activity. If your goal is integrated prospecting with native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring within Derrick, Derrick generally provides better pricing value, with the added benefit of more extensive 50+ enrichment attributes and broad integrations that can replace separate tools.

### Does Derrick review compare favorably to Skrapp?

Yes, Derrick compares favorably to Skrapp in several meaningful ways. While Skrapp excels at basic email extraction, Derrick offers deeper data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and company, plus integrated AI scoring and segmentation using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup, while Skrapp requires browser extensions and manual workflows. Additionally, Derrick provides real-time email validation, rollover credits, and no credit card needed for the free tier, making it a more comprehensive solution for teams seeking intelligence beyond simple contact discovery.

### Can Dux-Soup replace Skrapp for LinkedIn prospecting?

Short answer: Dux-Soup cannot fully replace Skrapp for LinkedIn prospecting, and Derrick offers a more complete alternative when you need integrated prospecting, enrichment, and outreach without LinkedIn automation concerns.

Dux-Soup excels at LinkedIn automation and profile scraping, while Skrapp specializes in fast email/phone extraction and data enrichment across LinkedIn and web sources. Skrapp provides strong data accuracy for contact details, but it lacks deep company insights and multi-source enrichment. Derrick, by contrast, combines 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and seamless Google Sheets-based prospecting with no CSV exports or complex setups. If your primary need is pure LinkedIn scraping versus email discovery, Dux-Soup or Skrapp may fit separately; however, Derrick offers a more holistic, compliant, and scalable solution for B2B prospecting without automation risks on LinkedIn.