# Evaboot Vs Apollo : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot excels at LinkedIn Sales Navigator data extraction with built-in email verification, ideal for teams scraping LinkedIn at scale. Apollo offers a full sales engagement platform with 275 million contacts, sequences, and CRM features, but carries higher monthly costs starting at $49 per user. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with 100+ enrichment data points from €9 monthly, suited for teams running lightweight workflows without leaving spreadsheets or needing rollover credits for variable monthly usage.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-apollo-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs apollo  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs apollo vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2ff9c5634f1a18ec0a7_69453749a60f394eff48b444_image_1766143817080.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Apollo

### Enrich leads with real-time validation, no manual checks

Derrick addresses real-time_validation needs that Evaboot and Apollo struggle with by delivering instant email validation and enrichment directly within Google Sheets, eliminating manual checks. Unlike Evaboot, which may require separate validation steps, Derrick offers 100% native Sheets integration with real-time email verification. This translates to faster pipeline throughput and higher deliverability, reducing wasted outreach time by up to 15-25% in typical campaigns. A practical example: validate and enrich 1,000 leads in under an hour, with credits tracked and reusable each month.

### Effortless scalable enrichment with deep AI-driven insights

Derrick tackles scalable enrichment by leveraging 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and integrated AI-powered scoring and segmentation to deliver deep insights at scale, something Evaboot struggles to match with its more limited enrichment depth and real-time analytics. Unlike Evaboot, which focuses on basic data quality checks, Derrick embeds Claude and ChatGPT for automatic profiling, scoring, and summaries within Google Sheets. This yields measurable gains: up to 5-10 hours saved per month in manual enrichment and clearer, AI-driven prospect rankings that improve targeting efficiency. A typical use case shows Derrick automatically enriching and scoring entire accounts in minutes, not hours, while credits are billable per action and credits are rollable month-to-month.

### Native Google Sheets workflow flexibility and rapid setup for adoption

Derrick empowers a native Google Sheets workflow with instant deployment, avoiding Evaboot’s and Apollo’s reliance on external or standalone interfaces that disrupt sheet-centric workflows. Unlike Evaboot’s limited data enrichment depth and Apollo’s separate outreach tooling, Derrick lives directly inside Sheets, eliminating CSV exports, extra setups, and complex integrations. Teams can enrich 50+ attributes per contact and validate emails in real time, saving 5-10 hours per month per user and accelerating adoption. Free-tier access and credits-based usage enable rapid start without credit card requirements, making rollout almost instantaneous.

## Evaboot vs apollo vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 59$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What's the Derrick vs Evaboot comparison for automation capabilities?

Derrick delivers automation through native Google Sheets integration with built-in AI scoring and segmentation using Claude and ChatGPT, eliminating the need for external platforms. Evaboot focuses on no-code workflow automation but lacks advanced AI analytics and requires more manual configuration. Derrick's key advantage lies in its 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and rollover credits system, making it more flexible for teams seeking intelligent automation without complex setup. Both platforms automate workflows, but Derrick combines enrichment depth with AI-driven intelligence directly within your spreadsheet, reducing implementation time significantly compared to Evaboot's approach.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for SMBs?

Derrick is better suited for SMBs prioritizing ease of use and cost efficiency. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring workflows, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex setup and CSV exports that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving approximately 1,200 dollars annually compared to Evaboot. With 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier, Derrick offers SMBs greater flexibility and lower total cost of ownership than Evaboot's traditional platform approach.

### How does Derrick compare to Evaboot vs Apollo all together?

Derrick operates as a fully native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex integrations that Evaboot and Apollo require. While Evaboot excels at basic lead scoring and Apollo provides extensive contact databases, Derrick distinguishes itself through integrated AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT for automated enrichment, scoring, and segmentation directly within sheets. Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for free access, and fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact offer greater flexibility and cost efficiency than competitors, particularly for teams seeking streamlined workflows without technical overhead.

### Evaboot vs Apollo pricing: which is more affordable?

Evaboot and Apollo pricing are not directly comparable on a single price tag, as both emphasize different strengths—Evaboot centers on intuitive automation with basic to mid-level enrichment, often appealing to smaller teams, while Apollo leans into large-scale outbound prospecting with a strong data footprint and outbound tooling. In general, Evaboot’s plans tend to scale with dataset size and feature depth, which can become less predictable for enterprise volumes. Apollo pricing reflects its breadth of data and multi-channel capabilities, which can be more expensive for teams needing extensive enrichment. Derrick, by contrast, offers a transparent credit-based model built into Google Sheets with 100% native usage, including real-time email validation, AI-powered scoring, and broad integrations, plus credit rollovers and a free tier without a credit card requirement. If affordability is the primary concern and you value a no-friction, no-CSV export workflow, Derrick can often be more cost-efficient at scale due to credits and native Google Sheets integration, while still delivering robust enrichment and AI capabilities that complement or replace separate data tools.

### Which has better features for data enrichment, Evaboot or Apollo?

Both Evaboot and Apollo offer data enrichment capabilities, but with different strengths. Evaboot excels at straightforward data quality assessment and lead scoring with an intuitive interface, while Apollo provides access to a larger contact database with strong email verification accuracy. However, both platforms have limitations—Evaboot struggles with complex enrichment scenarios and processing large datasets, while Apollo requires manual verification for niche industries and lacks real-time data refresh capabilities. For teams seeking more comprehensive enrichment with greater flexibility, Derrick App offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring directly within Google Sheets without the need for external platforms or complex configurations.

### Can Derrick replace Evaboot and Apollo for your workflow?

Derrick can replace Evaboot and Apollo for many workflow needs, but it depends on your priorities. Derrick’s strongest value comes from being 100% native to Google Sheets, meaning no exports or complex setups, plus AI-powered scoring and segmentation with Claude and ChatGPT, and flexible credits that roll over. Evaboot excels in intuitive lead scoring and CRM integration, yet it lacks Derrick’s deep AI analytics and native Google Sheets convenience. Apollo shines for large-scale contact databases and outbound automation but may require supplementary tools for advanced enrichment. If your workflow prioritizes seamless in-Google-Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-driven automation with flexible pricing, Derrick can effectively replace both; for deeply specialized enrichment or expansive contact databases, you might still pair Derrick with Evaboot or Apollo to cover those gaps.