# Evaboot Vs Captain Data : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator data extraction with built-in email validation, ideal for teams heavily invested in LinkedIn workflows. Captain Data offers broader workflow automation across multiple platforms but requires technical setup and monthly subscriptions starting around $199. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with 100+ enrichment data points, real-time email verification, and credit rollover from €9 monthly, making it the straightforward choice for teams wanting enrichment without external tools or complex automation builders.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-captain-data-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs Captain Data  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs Captain Data vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab39d2716b548a2481757_694536e68194d6f1a213fd77_image_1766143717662.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Captain Data

### Real-time validation, no LinkedIn dependency headaches for teams

Derrick addresses real-time validation without LinkedIn dependency headaches, a pain point Evaboot and Captain Data struggle with due to their limited real-time verification and LinkedIn-centric workflows. Unlike Evaboot, which focuses on data quality checks but lacks comprehensive real-time validation across sources, and Captain Data, which leans on LinkedIn-based prospecting, Derrick delivers instantaneous validation inside 100% native Google Sheets. This eliminates delays and error-prone manual checks, saving teams up to 5-10 hours per month and reducing LinkedIn reliance. A typical use case: run real-time email and contact validations as you build enriched profiles, without exporting to external tools.

### 360° data enrichment, unmatched multi-source coverage with Derrick

Derrick delivers 360° data enrichment across multiple sources, addressing Evaboot and Captain Data’s limited multi-source depth and inconsistent coverage beyond LinkedIn-based datasets. Unlike Evaboot’s basic enrichment and Captain Data’s LinkedIn-centric approach, Derrick integrates 50+ attributes per contact/firm, plus 3000+ integrations, to build a comprehensive profile in real time. Teams gain measurable efficiency: up to 10 hours saved per month per user and richer segmentation that boosts outreach response by up to 2x. A practical use case is instant multi-source profile completion for new leads, ensuring accurate targeting from the first touch.

### Effortless multi-source validation with automated data quality

Derrick tackles the multi-source validation gap that Evaboot and Captain Data leave unresolved, where cross-source consistency checks can be manual, time-consuming, and prone to gaps. Unlike Evaboot’s basic data assessment and Captain Data’s LinkedIn-centric focus, Derrick delivers automated cross-source validation with 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email verification within 100% native Google Sheets. This results in measurable efficiency: up to 8–12 hours saved per month per team and improved data quality with immediate visibility into validation gaps. Use cases include rapid prospect profiling and reliable outreach sequencing across multiple data sources without leaving your sheet.

## Evaboot vs Captain Data vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [Captain Data](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-captain-data-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 399$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference Derrick vs Evaboot for automation?

Derrick and Evaboot take fundamentally different approaches to automation. Evaboot focuses on no-code workflow automation across multiple tools, making it suitable for straightforward business process automation. Derrick, however, is purpose-built for B2B data enrichment directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports. While Evaboot excels at general automation workflows, Derrick delivers faster implementation with integrated AI capabilities, real-time email validation, and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. For teams already using Google Sheets for prospecting, Derrick automates enrichment natively without the complexity or setup overhead Evaboot typically requires.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for SMBs?

Derrick offers a more streamlined alternative to Evaboot for SMBs, particularly those already using Google Sheets. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring and CRM integration, Derrick eliminates the need for external platforms entirely with native Google Sheets functionality, saving five to ten hours monthly on data management. Derrick also provides integrated AI tools, real-time email validation, and over fifty enrichment attributes per contact without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, making it significantly more cost-effective for growing teams managing prospecting workflows directly within their existing spreadsheet infrastructure.

### Derrick vs Evaboot vs Captain Data: which is the trio’s best?

Choosing the best among these three depends on your specific needs. Evaboot excels at straightforward lead scoring with an intuitive interface, while Captain Data specializes in LinkedIn-based prospecting and contact enrichment. Derrick stands out by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup entirely. It offers 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. If you prioritize simplicity and work primarily in spreadsheets, Derrick delivers the most seamless workflow. For teams needing dedicated LinkedIn automation, Captain Data works well. For basic lead scoring, Evaboot fits the bill. Consider your primary data source and technical comfort level when deciding.

### Which is Evaboot vs Captain Data better for data enrichment?

For data enrichment, Evaboot and Captain Data focus on easier onboarding and multi-channel enrichment, but Derrick stands out with deeper, native enrichment within Google Sheets, 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring and summaries. Evaboot excels in intuitive dashboards but lacks the deeper enrichment depth and multi-source validation that Derrick offers. Captain Data provides strong LinkedIn-led prospecting and basic enrichment, yet its native enrichment depth and CRM-scale automation don’t match Derrick’s 100% Google Sheets native workflow, broad integrations, and scalable credit-based pricing. If you need robust, cost-efficient, extensible enrichment directly inside Sheets with AI-assisted segmentation, Derrick is the stronger option.

### Does Captain Data pricing beat Derrick’s for large teams?

Captain Data's pricing is competitive for smaller teams, but Derrick becomes more cost-effective as your team scales. Captain Data charges based on data volume and LinkedIn automation, which can escalate quickly with large-scale prospecting. Derrick's tiered credit system with rollover flexibility means unused credits carry forward monthly, reducing waste for fluctuating team needs. Plus, Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator at 1200 euros annually, and operates natively within Google Sheets without complex integrations. For large teams managing continuous prospecting workflows, Derrick's transparent, rollover-based pricing typically delivers better ROI than Captain Data's volume-dependent model.

### Can Derrick replace both Evaboot and Captain Data effectively?

Derrick cannot be considered a drop-in 1:1 replacement for Evaboot and Captain Data in all scenarios, but it can cover many of their core needs depending on your use case. Derrick offers deeper data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and vast native Google Sheets workflows, whereas Evaboot excels in intuitive lead scoring and CRM integration, and Captain Data specializes in LinkedIn-based prospecting and multi-channel enrichment. For teams seeking a single platform to both enrich data and power outreach, Derrick provides a strong, configurable alternative, especially for Google Sheets-centered processes. However, for pure LinkedIn-driven prospecting or ultra-fast no-code scraping, Evaboot or Captain Data may complement rather than replace Derrick.