# Evaboot Vs Clay : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator export automation with straightforward CSV workflows, while Clay offers waterfall enrichment across multiple providers but requires careful API configuration and faces rate-limit constraints at scale. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ data points per contact, eliminating the €1,200 annual Sales Navigator dependency through real-time validation and 3,000+ no-code integrations via Zapier and Make, ideal for teams prioritizing spreadsheet-native workflows and cost efficiency.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-clay-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs Clay  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs Clay vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2ffc548e07a6a85dedf_694536d27a7dff00816c222c_image_1766143697730.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Clay

### Save €1,200 yearly without Sales Navigator

Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, unlike Evaboot and Clay, which rely on separate data sources or manual outreach paths. Evaboot’s review highlights its focus on straightforward automation rather than deep, enterprise-grade enrichment, while Clay faces data accuracy and API rate-limit constraints that slow high-volume prospecting. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, saving 5-10h per month and €1,200 annually by removing the Sales Navigator dependency. With real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes, and seamless Zapier/Make integrations, Derrick completes targeted prospecting without extra tools.

### Real-time validation without data decay for accuracy

Evaboot and Clay both struggle with real-time validation reliability and data freshness, often delivering outdated or partial results that risk mis-targeting. Derrick delivers true real-time validation directly within 100% native Google Sheets, avoiding data decay and ensuring up-to-the-second accuracy. By validating emails and profiles on the fly as you enrich, Derrick saves time and reduces wasted outreach, translating to measurable deliverability gains and fewer rejections. With 50+ attributes per contact and instant feedback, teams can trust list quality before sending campaigns.

### Universal data enrichment with 3000+ integrations and no coding

Derrick tackles universal data enrichment by offering 3000+ integrations with no coding, a capability Evaboot and Clay struggle to match at scale. Evaboot’s review notes limited native data enrichment and deeper multi-source validation, while Clay highlights the need for careful configuration and ongoing validation to ensure data quality. Derrick resolves this by providing a 100% native Google Sheets integration layer with extensive connectors via Zapier/Make/n8n, enabling seamless enrichment across 3000+ sources without coding. Users gain precise, 50+ attribute enrichment per contact or company and faster workflow creation, saving hours monthly.

## Evaboot vs Clay vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [Clay](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-clay-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs Evaboot comparison for features and pricing?

Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex setup that both Evaboot and Clay require. While Evaboot focuses on lead scoring with CRM integrations and Clay excels at multi-source data aggregation, Derrick streamlines enrichment directly within Sheets with fifty plus contact and company attributes. Pricing-wise, Derrick offers rollover credits starting at nine dollars monthly with no card required for the free tier, providing greater flexibility than Evaboot's unpredictable scaling costs or Clay's rate limiting constraints. For teams prioritizing speed and simplicity over enterprise complexity, Derrick delivers faster implementation and lower total cost of ownership.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for SMBs?

Derrick is a strong alternative to Evaboot for SMBs, particularly if your team values simplicity and cost efficiency. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring workflows, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configurations that consume 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT at competitive pricing with rollover credits. Unlike Evaboot, Derrick requires no LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscription, potentially saving SMBs around $1,200 annually. For teams prioritizing straightforward prospecting without technical overhead, Derrick delivers faster implementation and greater flexibility.

### How do Derrick, Evaboot, and Clay differ in pricing and use cases?

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup that Evaboot and Clay require, saving teams five to ten hours monthly. Pricing-wise, Derrick's credits roll over each month with no credit card needed for the free tier, whereas Evaboot and Clay charge fixed monthly fees regardless of usage. For use cases, Derrick excels for teams wanting streamlined enrichment directly in their spreadsheets with built-in AI scoring, while Evaboot suits basic automation needs and Clay works best for high-volume outreach campaigns requiring extensive workflow customization.

### What’s Evaboot vs Clay difference for data enrichment accuracy?

Evaboot and Clay both offer data enrichment, but they differ in depth and real-time capabilities. Evaboot excels at straightforward enrichment with an easy setup and strong data quality checks for standard datasets, yet its enrichment depth and multi-source verification can be limited for complex, enterprise-grade needs. Clay delivers broader data sourcing, real-time validation, and automation across multiple sources, but results can vary with data freshness and source reliability. Derrick stands out by providing 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring within Google Sheets, making complex enrichment faster and more controllable. Credits can be rolled over, and no credit card is required for the free tier.

### Is Evaboot a good alternative to Clay for outreach workflows?

Evaboot is a solid option for basic lead scoring and qualification workflows, particularly if your team values simplicity and quick implementation. However, it lacks the comprehensive data enrichment depth that Clay provides for outreach campaigns. Clay excels at aggregating contact data from 50+ sources and automating complex prospecting sequences, making it better suited for high-volume outreach. That said, if you're already working in Google Sheets and want to avoid external platforms entirely, Derrick offers a 100% native alternative that eliminates CSV exports, includes AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and provides real-time email validation—all without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving significant monthly costs compared to both Evaboot and Clay.

### Can Derrick replace both Evaboot and Clay in one platform?

Derrick cannot fully replace both Evaboot and Clay in one platform for every scenario, but it can cover many core needs more seamlessly. Derrick is 100% native to Google Sheets with advanced AI-powered scoring, real-time email validation, and extensive automation through 3000+ integrations, offering strong data enrichment and prospecting capabilities within a familiar sheet-based workflow. Evaboot shines in straightforward lead evaluation and CRM integration, while Clay excels at real-time data sourcing, multi-source enrichment, and complex outreach workflows. If your requirements are heavy on advanced enrichment depth or highly customized multi-source workflows, you may still benefit from Evaboot or Clay in addition to Derrick. However, for teams prioritizing speed, ease of use, cost efficiency, and AI-driven segmentation within Sheets, Derrick provides a compelling consolidated alternative without exporting CSVs or managing separate tools.