# Evaboot Vs Cognism : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator lead exports with email validation, priced from $29/month for 1,000 credits. Cognism offers a multi-channel B2B database with phone-verified mobiles but requires custom enterprise pricing with no public tiers. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with real-time validation, AI-powered enrichment via Claude and ChatGPT, and transparent pricing starting at €9 for 100 credits with monthly rollover. Choose Evaboot for Sales Navigator workflows, Cognism for diamond-verified phone data at scale, or Derrick for native Sheets enrichment without exports.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-cognism-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs Cognism  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs Cognism vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2ff1a3b74f0211da424_694536aadd38159b088a7a4d_image_1766143658092.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Cognism

### Real-time validation + native Sheets, without exports

Derrick delivers real-time validation directly inside native Google Sheets, a capability Evaboot and Cognism lack when it comes to in-spreadsheet verification without exports. Unlike Evaboot’s basic validation workflow or Cognism’s emphasis on external verification, Derrick eliminates the need to export data for cleansing, saving 5-10 hours per month. With 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and real-time email validation, Derrick improves deliverability and data accuracy instantly within Sheets. A typical use case is validating emails on-the-fly as you populate prospect lists, ensuring clean outreach from the start.

### No NPS required: true value with flexible credits

Evaboot and Cognism require separate workflows or extra tools to achieve flexible credit usage and on-demand validation, which disrupts efficiency. Derrick delivers true value with a 100% native Google Sheets workflow and monthly rollable credits, eliminating the need for NPS-based integrations. With Derrick, you gain real-time email validation, 50+ enrichments per contact, and credits that roll over, saving time and reducing wasted spending—accessible without a LinkedIn Sales Navigator dependency. Use cases include quick, credit-efficient enrichment inside Sheets for rapid outbound prioritization, measurable in hours saved per month and cost avoidance.

### AI-powered Insights for Unified Prospect Intelligence

Derrick delivers AI-powered insights that unify prospect intelligence across sources, a capability Evaboot and Cognism lack when it comes to seamlessly combining validation, firmographic enrichment, and AI-driven segmentation within Google Sheets. Unlike Evaboot’s basic enrichment and Cognism’s emphasis on contact data alone, Derrick integrates Claude and ChatGPT-powered scoring and summaries directly into 100% native Sheets workflows. The result is faster, more accurate prospect profiling with AI-assisted prioritization, reducing manual triage by up to 40% and saving 5–10 hours per month. Use cases include auto-generated prospect summaries and AI-led tiering for multi-channel outreach.

## Evaboot vs Cognism vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [Cognism](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-cognism-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 1000$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs Evaboot difference in features and pricing?

Derrick is a native Google Sheets platform focused on data enrichment and automation without requiring external tools or CSV exports, while Evaboot functions as a no-code workflow automation platform with broader integration capabilities. Unlike Evaboot's general automation approach, Derrick specializes in B2B prospecting with fifty-plus enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI from Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation. Pricing-wise, Derrick offers more affordable entry points starting at nine dollars monthly with rollover credits and no card required for the free tier, whereas Evaboot's costs scale unpredictably with data volume. For teams already using Google Sheets and prioritizing enrichment depth over general workflow automation, Derrick delivers faster implementation and lower total cost of ownership.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for SMBs?

For SMBs, Derrick offers distinct advantages over Evaboot. While Evaboot excels at basic lead scoring, it requires external enrichment tools and struggles with datasets over 500K records. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex integrations, saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick provides fifty-plus enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. For budget-conscious SMBs prioritizing simplicity and avoiding LinkedIn Sales Navigator costs, Derrick delivers more comprehensive enrichment capabilities without the implementation friction Evaboot demands.

### Derrick vs Evaboot vs Cognism: which offers the best pricing?

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing structure with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, starting at zero euros for the free tier without requiring a credit card. Evaboot focuses on workflow automation with less transparent pricing, while Cognism positions itself as a premium intelligence platform with higher enterprise costs. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick's pay-as-you-go model starting at nine euros monthly, combined with fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact and integrated AI features, delivers superior value compared to Cognism's premium pricing or Evaboot's scaling costs that become disproportionate with data volume growth.

### How does Evaboot compare to Cognism in review quality?

Evaboot and Cognism offer strong review quality in their own domains, but they focus on different capabilities. Evaboot excels at straightforward data quality checks, lead scoring, and quick onboarding with a user-friendly interface, making it reliable for basic to intermediate data validation and rapid deployment. Cognism shines in verified contact data, real-time company insights, and intent signals, delivering high-fidelity B2B leads at scale. In terms of review depth, Cognism often receives praise for data accuracy and compliance, while Evaboot is favored for ease of use and speed. Derrick complements both by providing 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, AI-powered scoring and segmentation, and extensive integrations, enabling teams to validate and enrich prospects directly within their existing workflow without exporting to another tool. If you need deeper multi-source enrichment and account-level insights, Cognism may edge Evaboot, but for lightweight automation and seamless spreadsheet-based prospecting, Derrick offers a stronger, more integrated experience.

### Which is a stronger alternative for data enrichment: Derrick or Cognism?

Both Derrick and Cognism excel at data enrichment but serve different needs. Cognism specializes in verified B2B contact intelligence with strong EMEA coverage and intent signals, making it ideal for enterprise teams prioritizing data accuracy. Derrick offers broader enrichment capabilities with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring—all directly within Google Sheets without external platforms or CSV exports. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility for teams with variable enrichment volumes, while Cognism's premium positioning suits organizations needing specialized lead intelligence at scale.

### Can Derrick replace both Evaboot and Cognism in one platform?

Derrick cannot literally replace both Evaboot and Cognism in one platform, because those tools specialize in different data intelligence functions. Evaboot focuses on lead qualification and basic data enrichment within a user-friendly automation context, while Cognism emphasizes verified B2B contact data, intent signals, and account-based insights. Derrick, by contrast, is a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform with AI-powered scoring, real-time email validation, and a broad app ecosystem via Zapier/Make/n8n, plus cost-saving, no-Sales-Navigator dependency, and flexible credits. It can complement both by enriching contacts and scoring prospects, but for enterprise-grade data accuracy, multi-source enrichment, and advanced intent at scale, you’d typically pair Derrick with Cognism (for data quality and intent signals) or Evaboot (for streamlined automation) rather than expect Derrick to fully replace all specialized capabilities in a single platform.