# Evaboot Vs Dux-Soup : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn lead extraction with bulk export capabilities, while Dux-Soup automates LinkedIn prospecting through profile visits and connection requests. Derrick operates natively inside Google Sheets at €9 monthly with 100 enrichment credits and credit rollover, delivering real-time email validation and AI-driven multi-source enrichment across 100+ data points. Choose Evaboot for large-scale LinkedIn exports, Dux-Soup for LinkedIn automation workflows, or Derrick for spreadsheet-native enrichment with flexible integrations.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-dux-soup-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs Dux-Soup  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs Dux-Soup vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2a6519cb441b03405ee_6945363567f2e7f65e11515c_image_1766143541304.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Dux-Soup

### Real-time validation that avoids bounce waste without compliance risk

Derrick delivers real-time email validation directly within Google Sheets, ensuring you only send to verified addresses and avoid bounce waste. Evaboot falls short on real-time validation depth and often relies on broader enrichment without continuous verification, while Dux-Soup focuses on LinkedIn outreach with limited real-time email validation. Derrick resolves this by validating emails at the moment of capture and keeping credits reusable, reducing wasted sends and protecting deliverability. Use-case: run a live prospect list in Sheets, validate on-the-fly, and maintain compliant, bounce-free campaigns without extra tooling.

### Flexible, scalable 3000+ integrations for complex workflows

Derrick shines where Evaboot and Dux-Soup fall short on complex workflows: 3000+ integrations through Zapier, Make, and n8n, enabling seamless multi-tool orchestration. Unlike Evaboot’s limited enrichment depth and Dux-Soup’s LinkedIn-centric scope, Derrick delivers native, scalable connections across apps while maintaining 100% Google Sheets native workflows. This results in tangible time savings and smoother orchestration, with reusability across teams and projects. For example, teams can automate end-to-end prospect journeys with consistent data flow, reducing manual handoffs by up to 30% month over month.

### Native AI-driven multi-source enrichment for complete prospect profiles

Derrick tackles the limitation of Evaboot and Dux-Soup by delivering native AI-driven multi-source enrichment directly inside Google Sheets, producing complete prospect profiles without leaving your workflow. Unlike Evaboot, which can struggle with deep enrichment and multi-source validation, Derrick combines AI scoring, segmentation, and summarization with 50+ attributes per contact in a single pane. Users gain a measurable uplift: faster profile completeness, reducing manual research time by up to 40–60% and increasing usable records per batch. A practical use case is instant, AI-generated firmographic and technographic context appended to each contact, streamlining outbound targeting.

## Evaboot vs Dux-Soup vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 11.25$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Is Derrick better than Evaboot for small teams?

Derrick and Evaboot serve different needs for small teams. Evaboot excels at straightforward lead scoring and CRM integration, making it solid for basic automation. However, Derrick offers superior value for small teams through native Google Sheets integration, eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, and providing 50+ enrichment attributes with real-time email validation. Derrick's rollover credits and free tier without requiring a credit card make it more cost-effective and flexible as your team scales, while integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT adds intelligence Evaboot doesn't match natively.

### How does Derrick compare to Evaboot in features?

Derrick offers native Google Sheets integration without requiring external platforms or CSV exports, streamlining your entire prospecting workflow directly within the tool you already use. Unlike Evaboot's focus on lead scoring and automation, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation and integrated AI powered by Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent segmentation and scoring. Derrick also eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving approximately 1200 dollars annually compared to Evaboot, while offering rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier, providing greater flexibility and cost efficiency for growing teams.

### Derrick vs Evaboot vs Dux-Soup: what's the main difference?

Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform requiring no CSV exports or complex setup, while Evaboot functions as a no-code automation tool better suited for general workflows, and Dux-Soup specializes exclusively in LinkedIn automation. Derrick distinguishes itself through integrated AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, fifty-plus enrichment attributes, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. Unlike Evaboot's limited enrichment depth or Dux-Soup's LinkedIn-only focus, Derrick delivers comprehensive B2B data enrichment directly within your spreadsheet workflow, saving teams five to ten hours monthly while eliminating the need for expensive LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions.

### Is Evaboot a good alternative to Dux-Soup for automation?

Yes, Evaboot can be a reasonable alternative to Dux-Soup for basic automation, especially if your focus is straightforward lead scoring and CRM integration without LinkedIn-specific constraints. Evaboot shines in ease of use, quick setup, and good CRM syncing, making it suitable for small to mid-sized teams. However, it lacks the deeper enrichment, multi-source validation, and complex automation depth that Derrick offers with 100% native Google Sheets support, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring. If you need broader data enrichment and more granular control over workflows at scale, Derrick provides clear advantages. If your use case centers on LinkedIn-centric outreach, Dux-Soup remains strong, but Evaboot offers a simpler, no-code path for primary automation.

### Does Evaboot pricing beat Dux-Soup pricing?

Evaboot and Dux-Soup target different use cases, making direct pricing comparison challenging. Evaboot focuses on data enrichment and lead scoring with costs scaling based on data volume, while Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation with predictable monthly pricing. Neither offers the cost efficiency of Derrick, which provides 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving organizations up to 1200 euros annually while operating natively within Google Sheets for streamlined workflows.

### Can Derrick replace both Evaboot and Dux-Soup?

Derrick cannot be a direct replacement for both Evaboot and Dux-Soup in every use case, but it can cover the core needs that those tools address while offering distinctive advantages. For Evaboot-style lead qualification and data enrichment, Derrick provides 100% native Google Sheets integration, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, all without requiring a LinkedIn-based workflow or complex setup. For Dux-Soup-style LinkedIn automation, Derrick excels as a broader prospecting platform by centralizing enrichment (50+ attributes per contact, firm-wide insights) and offering extensive integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, plus IA-driven summaries and prioritization. However, Evaboot’s multi-source enrichment depth and Dux-Soup’s LinkedIn-native automation have specialized strengths that Derrick approaches differently; if your needs hinge on deep multi-source enrichment or strict LinkedIn automation compliance, you may still pair Derrick with targeted tools. In short, Derrick can replace many routine tasks from both, while delivering added value through native Sheets, AI scoring, and flexible integrations, but for highly specialized use cases you might maintain tool-specific workflows.