# Evaboot Vs Emailsearch.Io : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn data extraction with quality focus and basic scoring, while EmailSearch.io centers on single-purpose email discovery without enrichment depth. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with real-time email validation, 50+ contact attributes, and AI-powered scoring via Claude or ChatGPT integration, eliminating the multi-tool complexity both competitors require. Choose Evaboot for LinkedIn-first workflows, EmailSearch.io for simple email finding, or Derrick at €9 per month for native Sheets enrichment with 3000+ app integrations and credit rollover.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-emailsearch-io-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs EmailSearch.io  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs EmailSearch.io vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab39d0f0dc4343f100725_6945362209e03582a7018333_image_1766143521983.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Emailsearch.Io

### Real-time validation meets data enrichment without complexity

Derrick delivers real-time email validation and data enrichment directly within 100% native Google Sheets, a combination Evaboot and EmailSearch.io can’t match in a single workflow. Unlike Evaboot, which focuses on data quality with limited enrichment depth, Derrick adds 50+ attributes per contact and real-time verification without leaving Sheets. This means immediate deliverability improvements and richer profiles in one place, saving 5-10 hours per month. No complex setup or API juggling is required, so teams can scale outreach without complexity.

### Massive-scale integrations without extra development effort

Derrick eliminates the heavy lift Evaboot and EmailSearch.io require for large-scale integrations by delivering 3000+ native connections through Zapier/Make/n8n and a 100% Google Sheets-native workflow. Evaboot’s no-code automation and EmailSearch.io’s single-focus email discovery fall short of enterprise-scale integration, often demanding extra tooling for multi-source data and workflows. Derrick enables massive-scale data enrichment and prospecting without dev effort, saving 5-10h per month per user and enabling seamless, billable-friendly automation across apps. A typical use case: batch enrichment and validation across hundreds of thousands of contacts directly inside Sheets, with credits remaining rollovers and no credit card required for the free tier.

### Seamless AI-Powered Prospect Scoring for Faster Qualification

Derrick delivers seamless AI-powered prospect scoring that Evaboot and EmailSearch.io cannot match, as Evaboot focuses on data quality and basic lead scoring while EmailSearch.io centers on email discovery rather than holistic scoring. Derrick integrates Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring, segmentation, and summaries directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating extra tools and complex setups. This results in faster qualification and measurable throughput gains, with real-time scoring updates and actionable intent signals that reduce time-to-qualify by up to 30-40% for outbound campaigns. A practical use case: auto-score new leads as they enter sheets, then trigger targeted sequences automatically.

## Evaboot vs EmailSearch.io vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [EmailSearch.io](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternative-emailsearch/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 29$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference Derrick vs Evaboot for automations?

Derrick excels at automation directly within Google Sheets without requiring external platforms or CSV exports, whereas Evaboot operates as a standalone no-code platform requiring data transfers between systems. Derrick's native integration eliminates manual workflow steps and saves teams five to ten hours monthly on data management. Additionally, Derrick includes built-in AI automation using both Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent scoring and segmentation, while Evaboot focuses primarily on lead qualification workflows. Derrick's rollover credits and zero credit card requirement for the free tier also provide greater flexibility for teams scaling their automation needs cost-effectively.

### Is Derrick a better Evaboot alternative for small teams?

Yes, Derrick is a strong alternative to Evaboot for small teams, particularly if you work directly in Google Sheets. Unlike Evaboot's no-code platform requiring separate tools and exports, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating manual data transfers and saving five to ten hours monthly. Derrick delivers fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact with real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. While Evaboot excels at workflow automation, Derrick combines enrichment depth with operational simplicity, making it ideal for lean teams prioritizing efficiency and cost control without licensing LinkedIn Sales Navigator separately.

### How does Derrick compare to EmailSearch.io in pricing?

Derrick offers significantly more flexible pricing with rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier, whereas EmailSearch.io requires upfront commitment. Derrick's Small plan at nine dollars monthly provides four thousand credits with native Google Sheets integration, eliminating costly LinkedIn subscriptions and CSV workflows. EmailSearch.io focuses purely on email discovery with limited enrichment depth, while Derrick delivers fifty-plus contact and company attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring capabilities across multiple data dimensions for more comprehensive prospect intelligence.

### Which is the better comparison: Derrick vs Evaboot vs EmailSearch.io?

Derrick vs Evaboot vs EmailSearch.io: which is the better comparison depends on what you need. If your priority is a seamless, Google Sheets–native data enrichment and advanced AI scoring within a single workflow, Derrick clearly stands out—no CSV exports, 100% native Sheets, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. Evaboot excels for quick, no-code lead scoring and straightforward CRM integration, but lacks Derrick’s depth in enrichment and analytics and can require external tools for complex workflows. EmailSearch.io is best for fast, bulk email discovery and verification with a simple interface, yet it does not offer Derrick’s multi-attribute enrichment, enterprise-grade automation, or AI-driven segmentation. In short: for enterprise-grade prospect profiling and a unified workflow inside Google Sheets, Derrick is the stronger comparison; for lightweight automation with basic enrichment, Evaboot; for rapid email discovery, EmailSearch.io.

### Evaboot vs EmailSearch.io: which is the superior alternative?

EmailSearch.io and Evaboot serve different purposes, making a direct comparison challenging. EmailSearch.io excels as a standalone email finder with fast verification and intuitive interface, ideal for teams focused solely on email discovery. Evaboot offers broader lead scoring and automation capabilities with stronger CRM integration, better suited for comprehensive qualification workflows. However, neither platform combines email enrichment with advanced data intelligence natively within your existing tools. If you're seeking a unified solution that delivers 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring without leaving Google Sheets or requiring external platforms, Derrick provides that integrated approach with rollover credits and no upfront card requirement, potentially saving you thousands annually versus combining multiple point solutions.

### Does Derrick offer a compelling pricing and features review over Evaboot and EmailSearch.io?

Yes, Derrick offers a compelling pricing and features comparison versus Evaboot and EmailSearch.io, especially for teams seeking a data enrichment and prospecting hub fully inside Google Sheets. Derrick’s pricing is credit-based with a free tier and monthly rollovers, which can be more cost-predictable than Evaboot’s scaling or EmailSearch.io’s per-seat style. Beyond price, Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation for better deliverability, integrated AI for scoring, segmentation, and auto-summaries, and extensive automation via 3,000+ integrations. While Evaboot emphasizes intuitive lead scoring and CRM integration, and EmailSearch.io excels at fast, basic email discovery, Derrick consolidates enrichment, AI insights, and streamlined workflow—all within Sheets—reducing tooling fragmentation and potential ROI uncertainty for mid-to-scale teams.