# Evaboot Vs Hunter : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator exports with strong data quality, while Hunter focuses on email finding and verification. Derrick App works 100% natively in Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation, eliminating the €1,200 annual Sales Navigator subscription Evaboot requires. Evaboot suits teams already invested in Sales Navigator; Hunter excels at standalone email discovery; Derrick fits teams wanting consolidated enrichment inside Sheets without extra tool subscriptions.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-hunter-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs hunter  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs hunter vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab1cd53940e8796c443c1_69453574a9c814e270bb4869_image_1766143348196.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Hunter

### Save €1,200 yearly without Sales Navigator

Derrick eliminates the need for Sales Navigator, a capability Evaboot and Hunter rely on for extended prospect data, which keeps costs high. Unlike Evaboot’s focus on data quality and Hunter’s email-only approach, Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets experience with 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation, all without a Sales Navigator subscription. By consolidating enrichment, validation, and multi-source data in Sheets, Derrick can save teams up to €1,200 per year while reducing manual data wrangling. No credit card is required for the free tier, and monthly credits are rollable for flexibility.

### Real-time, multi-source enrichment without data gaps

Evaboot and Hunter struggle with real-time, multi-source enrichment and often leave data gaps across disparate sources. Derrick delivers real-time enrichment directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, consolidating multiple data streams without exporting or complex setups. By combining 50+ enrichment attributes and live email validation, Derrick fills gaps faster, saving up to 5-10 hours per month and improving data completeness by an estimated 20-30% for outbound campaigns. With immediate, in-sheet insights and seamless Zapier/Make integrations, Derrick keeps your prospect profiles current without switching tools.

### Instant CRM-ready enrichment without multi-tool juggling

Derrick delivers instant CRM-ready enrichment without multi-tool juggling, a pain point Evaboot and Hunter expose when users chase data across multiple platforms. Unlike Evaboot’s narrow enrichment scope or Hunter’s email-first focus, Derrick provides 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and real-time validation, all in one place. This consolidation saves time and boosts accuracy, translating to up to 5–10 hours saved per month and a faster path to CRM-ready data. With Derrick, you skip CSV exports, extra logins, and manual stitching—everything updates directly in your sheet for immediate use.

## Evaboot vs hunter vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [hunter](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-hunter-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### How does Derrick compare to Evaboot in features and pricing?

Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex integrations that Evaboot requires. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring automation, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with integrated AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent segmentation. Pricing-wise, Derrick starts at zero dollars with 200 free credits and rollover unused credits monthly, whereas Evaboot's costs scale unpredictably with data volume. For teams already using Google Sheets, Derrick eliminates the workflow friction that Evaboot users often experience, making it more efficient for smaller operations seeking straightforward enrichment without technical overhead.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for automation?

Derrick offers a more streamlined automation experience compared to Evaboot, particularly for teams already working in Google Sheets. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring workflows, it requires external tools for comprehensive enrichment and struggles with processing large datasets efficiently. Derrick eliminates these friction points by operating natively within Google Sheets, providing fifty plus enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI capabilities using both Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility than Evaboot's scaling costs, making it more cost-effective for teams seeking powerful automation without the implementation complexity or hidden expenses.

### What’s the difference Derrick vs Evaboot for Google Sheets use?

Derrick operates as a fully native Google Sheets platform, eliminating the need for CSV exports or external tools that Evaboot requires. While Evaboot excels at lead scoring within CRM systems, Derrick integrates directly into your spreadsheet workflow with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and built-in AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility than Evaboot's traditional SaaS model, making it ideal for teams prioritizing seamless Google Sheets-based prospecting without switching between platforms.

### Is Derrick a better replacement for hunter than Evaboot?

Derrick is generally a stronger replacement for Hunter when you need a broader, data-enrichment oriented tool combined with outbound prospecting, whereas Evaboot focuses more on lead scoring and basic enrichment. Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, embedded AI scoring and segmentation, and native Google Sheets integration—all without data export or complex setup. Hunter excels at accurate email discovery and verification but lacks multi-dimensional company insights; Evaboot adds some enrichment but can fall short on depth for large-scale, complex workflows. If your goal is end-to-end prospect qualification with deeper data and automation directly inside Sheets, Derrick is the better replacement for Hunter than Evaboot.

### How do Evaboot and hunter pricing compare to Derrick?

Evaboot and Hunter take different approaches to pricing compared to Derrick. Evaboot charges based on automation workflows and data volume, with costs scaling unpredictably as datasets grow, while Hunter operates on a credit-based email discovery model. Derrick offers transparent, rollover credits starting at just nine dollars monthly with no card required for the free tier, providing better budget predictability. Derrick combines email verification with fifty plus enrichment attributes and integrated AI scoring, delivering more comprehensive value than either platform's specialized focus without hidden scaling costs.

### Can Derrick replace both Evaboot and hunter for SMBs?

Yes, Derrick can replace Evaboot and Hunter for many SMB use cases, but with caveats. Derrick is a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment platform with real-time email validation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, all integrated directly inside Sheets. This makes it a strong all-in-one alternative for SMBs seeking streamlined data enrichment, reliable deliverability, and actionable insights without exporting to separate tools. However, Evaboot specializes in lead qualification and some enrichment, while Hunter focuses on email discovery and verification. For teams needing deep multi-source enrichment or extensive enterprise-grade insights, Evaboot or Hunter may still offer complementary strengths. Derrick’s pricing model (credits that roll over and free tier) and its extensive integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n also provide a cost-efficient, low-friction path for SMBs looking to consolidate workflows in a single tool.