# Evaboot Vs Kaspr : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator extraction with CSV exports, while Kaspr focuses on browser-based contact enrichment with built-in email validation. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with native enrichment across 100+ data points, 3000+ app integrations, and real-time validation without exports. Choose Evaboot for LinkedIn-first workflows, Kaspr for quick browser lookups, or Derrick at €9/month when your prospecting lives in Sheets and you need automated validation plus credit rollover across months.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-kaspr-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs Kaspr  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs Kaspr vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab1cd8a2a94117a2090b2_69453560d4888f242e16c019_image_1766143328142.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Kaspr

### Save 5–10 hours monthly with native Sheets enrichment

Evaboot and Kaspr struggle with native Sheets-centric workflows, often forcing manual data transfers or multi-tool workarounds that break the momentum of Google Sheets-based prospecting. Derrick delivers a 100% native Google Sheets enrichment experience, eliminating exports and complex configurations. By enriching 50+ attributes per contact directly inside Sheets and automating data quality with real-time validation and AI-assisted scoring, Derrick saves 5–10 hours per month. A practical use case: enrich a prospect list in Sheets, validate emails instantly, and segment without leaving the workbook.

### Real-time validation reduces manual verification bottlenecks across teams

Real-time validation is often hampered by Evaboot and Kaspr, which struggle to deliver continuous multi-source verification at scale and frequently rely on manual checks for accuracy. Derrick differentiates itself by providing real-time validation directly within 100% native Google Sheets, enabling immediate error detection across teams without leaving the platform. This reduces manual verification bottlenecks and accelerates collaboration, delivering measurable gains in deliverability and QA cycles. For example, teams can cut data reconciliation time by up to 40% as they validate contacts and company signals in real time. Derrick makes quick, cross-team validation a seamless, rule-driven process.

### Unified data quality with 3000+ integrations and AI insights

Derrick tackles unified data quality by integrating 3000+ apps and AI insights, addressing Evaboot’s limitations in deep multi-source validation and Kaspr’s narrow focus on contact-level data. Unlike Evaboot or Kaspr, Derrick provides broad, multi-dimensional enrichment that goes beyond single-source verification, tying together company, contact, and intent signals. Users gain measurable improvements in data completeness and accuracy, with uniform quality across platforms and actionable AI-driven scoring and segmentation. A practical use case: enrich entire prospect profiles in Sheets with consistent attributes, reducing downstream cleaning time by up to 30%.

## Evaboot vs Kaspr vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [Kaspr](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-kaspr-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### How does Derrick compare to Evaboot in features and pricing?

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that Evaboot requires. While Evaboot excels at straightforward automation, Derrick offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with integrated AI scoring using both Claude and ChatGPT. Pricing-wise, Derrick's rollover credits and free tier without credit card requirements provide more flexibility than Evaboot's scaling costs. For teams seeking deeper prospect intelligence combined with spreadsheet simplicity, Derrick delivers comprehensive enrichment directly where you work.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for SMBs?

It depends on your specific needs. Evaboot excels at straightforward lead scoring and CRM integration with minimal setup friction, making it solid for basic SMB automation. However, Derrick offers distinct advantages for data-driven teams: it's 100% native to Google Sheets with no CSV exports or complex configuration, includes AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, and features rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving approximately 1200 dollars annually. For SMBs prioritizing ease of use without leaving Google Sheets and seeking comprehensive enrichment capabilities, Derrick delivers better value and operational efficiency than Evaboot's standalone approach.

### What’s the Derrick vs Evaboot difference in AI analytics?

Derrick integrates advanced AI analytics directly within Google Sheets using both Claude and ChatGPT, enabling real-time scoring, segmentation, and automated insights without leaving your spreadsheet. Evaboot focuses primarily on workflow automation and basic lead qualification rather than sophisticated AI-driven analytics. Kaspr excels at phone verification but lacks comprehensive analytical capabilities for prospect profiling. Derrick's dual AI engine provides deeper contextual analysis across 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, allowing teams to uncover patterns and intent signals that Evaboot's simpler automation and Kaspr's contact-level focus cannot match, all while maintaining native Google Sheets functionality for streamlined workflows.

### Can Evaboot replace Derrick for basic automation needs?

No. Evaboot cannot fully replace Derrick for basic automation needs, though it covers straightforward automation tasks well. Evaboot emphasizes no-code lead qualification and CRM integrations but lacks Derrick’s deep data enrichment across 50+ attributes, real-time email validation depth, and AI-powered scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick remains stronger for comprehensive prospect profiling, automated segmentation, and long-tail automation workflows, especially when you value native Google Sheets workflows, credits that roll over, and extensive integrations. If your needs are strictly basic automation with quick setup, Evaboot could suffice, but for richer enrichment and scalable, AI-driven automation, Derrick offers a more robust solution. Kaspr complements by focusing on contact discovery and verification rather than broad automation and enrichment.

### Which is more affordable: Derrick or Kaspr for teams?

Derrick offers significantly better affordability for teams compared to Kaspr. Derrick's pricing starts at just $9 monthly for 4,000 credits with rollover benefits, while Kaspr operates on a credit-based model that typically costs more for comparable volume. Additionally, Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams approximately $1,200 annually. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card, making it ideal for testing, whereas Kaspr demands upfront commitment. For budget-conscious teams seeking maximum value without sacrificing enrichment depth, Derrick delivers superior ROI through lower monthly costs and flexible credit management.

### What’s Evaboot vs Kaspr review for data enrichment vs prospecting?

Evaboot focuses on straightforward data enrichment and easy lead evaluation, with strong usability for basic enrichment tasks and quick CRM integration, but its depth in multi-source data, advanced analytics, and real-time validation can be limited. Kaspr excels in LinkedIn-based prospecting, real-time contact verification, and seamless CRM flow, yet it often lacks comprehensive firmographic enrichment and deep multi-dimensional data. Derrick, by contrast, offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, 3000+ integrations, and AI-driven scoring within native Google Sheets—all without export steps or credit card requirements, making it a more holistic option for data-rich prospecting.