# Evaboot Vs Skrapp : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot focuses on LinkedIn Sales Navigator exports with basic automation, Skrapp specializes in quick contact discovery from websites and LinkedIn, and Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with no Sales Navigator dependency. Evaboot requires Sales Navigator at €100 monthly, Skrapp offers fast scraping but limited multi-source validation, while Derrick provides real-time email validation across 50+ enrichment attributes starting at €9 with monthly credit rollover. Choose based on your existing toolchain and budget tolerance for recurring subscriptions.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-skrapp-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs Skrapp  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs Skrapp vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab3406432c16714b27993_694534488194d6f1a2128055_image_1766143047668.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Skrapp

### Save €1,200 yearly without Sales Navigator

Derrick positions a cost-saving edge over Evaboot and Skrapp by eliminating the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, which many teams rely on and pay for. Evaboot’s focus on basic automation and Skrapp’s emphasis on quick contact discovery don’t address the broader sales intelligence and enrichment Derrick delivers in 100% native Google Sheets. By centralizing 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and scalable AI-driven scoring directly in Sheets, Derrick enables you to save €1,200 yearly compared to maintaining Sales Navigator subscriptions. Practical outcome: accurate prospect insights, faster workflows, and monthly credit carryover that avoids wasted spend.

### Real-time email validation across multi-source data reliability

Evaboot and Skrapp struggle with real-time, multi-source email validation, often delivering inconsistent results or relying on limited data sources. Derrick differentiates by delivering real-time email validation across a broader set of data sources within 100% native Google Sheets, enabling immediate deliverability insights without exporting data. This approach reduces bounce risk and increases inbox placement, saving hours per week on data cleaning and verification. For quick use-case clarity, Derrick validates emails as you type while enriching with multi-source context directly in Sheets.

### Unified data quality across multi-source signals for better targeting

Evaboot and Skrapp each show gaps in multi-source validation, leaving targeting data siloed and prone to gaps. Derrick consolidates and harmonizes signals from multiple sources within 100% native Google Sheets, avoiding CSV exports and ad-hoc workarounds. This yields a measurable boost in targeting quality, with up to a 15% reduction in bounce and a 10–20% lift in match rate across campaigns. Derrick also preserves credits monthly, enabling reliable, scalable enrichment without sacrificing accuracy.

## Evaboot vs Skrapp vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [Skrapp](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-skrapp-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 30$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and Evaboot in features?

Derrick and Evaboot differ significantly in their core approach to data enrichment and workflow automation. Evaboot functions as a no-code automation platform focused on straightforward lead scoring and CRM integration, excelling at basic qualification tasks. Derrick, conversely, operates as a native Google Sheets enrichment platform offering 50+ contact and company attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI capabilities with both Claude and ChatGPT for advanced scoring and segmentation. While Evaboot requires external tools for deeper data enrichment, Derrick consolidates enrichment, validation, and AI-powered analysis directly within Sheets, eliminating export friction and reducing implementation complexity. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and free tier without credit card requirements provide more flexibility for teams managing variable prospecting volumes compared to Evaboot's scaled pricing model.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for teams?

Derrick offers stronger advantages for most teams compared to Evaboot. While Evaboot excels at basic lead scoring, it struggles with processing speed on large datasets and lacks advanced enrichment capabilities. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex setup, and includes 50+ enrichment attributes plus integrated AI from Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation. Derrick also provides rollover credits and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it more cost-effective and flexible than Evaboot's unpredictable scaling pricing for growing teams.

### Derrick vs Evaboot vs Skrapp: which is more cost-effective?

Derrick offers the most cost-effective solution when you factor in total ownership costs. Evaboot requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions and scales unpredictably with data volume, while Skrapp functions primarily as a contact finder without deeper enrichment. Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits—all without requiring a credit card for the free tier. At nine dollars monthly for 4,000 credits, you eliminate expensive third-party tool stacking, saving five to ten hours weekly on data management and reducing overall prospecting infrastructure costs significantly compared to both competitors.

### Which tool offers better pricing among Evaboot and Skrapp?

Based on pricing structures, Evaboot and Skrapp offer competitive pricing for smaller teams, but Derrick often delivers greater value at similar or lower monthly costs when you consider total cost of ownership. Evaboot pricing scales with data and automation needs, while Skrapp focuses on prospecting with limited enrichment at higher data volumes. Derrick provides 100% native Google Sheets integration with a free tier and monthly roll-over credits, plus 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, AI-powered scoring, and no credit card required for the free tier. For teams seeking long-term cost efficiency and broader capabilities without exporting data or paying for external tools, Derrick tends to offer the better pricing-value mix compared to Evaboot and Skrapp.

### How does Skrapp compare to Derrick for lead enrichment?

Skrapp specializes in LinkedIn-based email extraction and contact discovery, making it excellent for rapid prospecting workflows. However, Derrick provides deeper lead enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact including firmographics, intent signals, and behavioral data that Skrapp lacks. While Skrapp excels at finding emails, Derrick enriches those contacts comprehensively within Google Sheets natively, eliminating manual exports. Derrick also includes real-time email validation, integrated AI for scoring and segmentation, and rollover credits, offering more complete enrichment intelligence for strategic outreach campaigns.

### Can Evaboot replace Skrapp for basic automation tasks?

Evaboot can handle basic automation tasks and simple lead workflows, but it isn’t a direct replacement for Skrapp if your primary need is contact discovery and email verification. Skrapp excels at fast, browser-based prospecting and one-click data capture from LinkedIn, while Evaboot focuses more on automated lead qualification and workflow automation. For teams already using Derrick, you gain 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring to complement either tool, so Derrick can cover broader prospecting, enrichment, and insights beyond what Evaboot and Skrapp offer together. If your needs are strictly basic automation and quick setup, Evaboot may suffice, but for comprehensive discovery and enrichment at scale, Skrapp plus Derrick provides stronger coverage.