# Evaboot Vs Vayne : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator data export with quality filters but requires separate enrichment tools for contact details. Vayne offers high-volume LinkedIn scraping without native email or phone extraction. Derrick provides contact-ready records inside Google Sheets with emails, phones, and 50+ enrichment attributes validated in real-time, eliminating multi-tool workflows. Choose Evaboot for Sales Navigator-focused exports, Vayne for bulk LinkedIn scraping, or Derrick for end-to-end enrichment workflows starting at €9 monthly with credit rollover.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/evaboot-vs-vayne-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Evaboot vs vayne  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Evaboot vs vayne vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab33f64faa9931315baa1_694533c2a60f394eff47a338_image_1766142914364.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Evaboot Or Vayne

### Emails and phones included, without extra steps

Derrick addresses the gap left by Evaboot and Vayne, which either lack direct contact details or require separate workflows to enrich leads. Evaboot’s focus on data quality without seamless contact enrichment and Vayne’s failure to provide emails or phones means prospects aren’t outreach-ready out of the box. Derrick delivers emails and phone numbers within the same Google Sheets workflow, eliminating export steps and additional tools. Real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes ensure contact-ready records, saving 5-10 hours per month per user. This single, native solution keeps everything in one place for immediate outreach.

### Ultra-fast data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact

Evaboot and Vayne expose a critical gap: they scrape or validate data but fail to deliver ready-to-action contact records with 50+ attributes per contact. Derrick differs by delivering ultra-fast enrichment directly within 100% native Google Sheets, avoiding CSV exports and multi-tool workarounds. Users gain a concrete, measurable lift: 50+ enriched attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and immediate use in outreach workflows, reducing time-to-contact by up to 40%. With Derrick, you’ll extract, enrich, and act in a single sheet—no separate enrichment step required.

### Unified Data Quality Across Sources, Not Just Enrichment Quality

Derrick addresses a crucial gap Evaboot and Vayne expose: data quality across multiple sources, not just enrichment depth. While Evaboot highlights gaps in multi-source validation and Vayne offers high-volume scraping without contact data, Derrick delivers unified quality by integrating enrichment and verification across sources within a single Google Sheets workflow. This yields actionable records with consistent accuracy, reducing duplicates and mismatches, saving up to 5-10 hours per month per team and boosting deliverability. With real-time validation and 50+ attributes per contact, Derrick keeps prospect data cohesive from first touch to outreach, eliminating cross-tool inconsistencies.

## Evaboot vs vayne vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) | Derrick App | [vayne](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-vayne-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 29$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and Evaboot for automation?

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or external platforms, whereas Evaboot functions as a separate no-code tool requiring manual data transfers. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions, saving teams over 1200 euros annually compared to Evaboot's workflow. Additionally, Derrick provides real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no card required for the free tier, delivering more flexibility and deeper automation capabilities than Evaboot's straightforward but limited enrichment approach.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Evaboot for teams?

Derrick offers distinct advantages for teams compared to Evaboot. While Evaboot excels at basic lead scoring, Derrick provides native Google Sheets integration eliminating CSV friction, comprehensive enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact, and built-in AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick doesn't require LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams roughly $1,200 annually versus Evaboot. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for free tier provide more flexibility. For teams seeking streamlined workflows without technical setup complexity, Derrick delivers faster implementation and deeper data enrichment capabilities than Evaboot's straightforward but limited approach.

### Derrick vs Evaboot vs vayne: who wins on features?

Feature comparison across these three platforms reveals distinct positioning. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets with integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT, eliminating CSV friction entirely. Evaboot excels at workflow automation and lead scoring but lacks advanced enrichment depth, requiring supplementary tools for comprehensive prospect profiling. Vayne dominates high-volume LinkedIn extraction with up to 15,000 daily profiles but critically lacks contact enrichment, leaving users without emails or phone numbers for actual outreach. Derrick wins on integrated completeness, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and seamless Google Sheets workflow without external dependencies. For teams prioritizing end-to-end prospecting efficiency, Derrick provides superior feature consolidation compared to Evaboot's automation focus or Vayne's extraction-only approach.

### Which is the better pricing: Derrick or vayne?

Derrick typically offers better value for pricing when compared to Vayne for most B2B teams, especially those needing complete prospecting workflows without complex setups. Derrick uses a credits-based system with rollovers, a free tier, and scalable plans starting from 9€ for 4,000 credits, plus large XL plans, all within a 100% native Google Sheets environment. In contrast, Vayne’s pricing focuses on high-volume scraping with a low starting price but lacks contact enrichment, native CRM integrations, and real-time verification, which often drives users to add costly enrichment tools. If your priority is a complete, contact-ready dataset and seamless integration inside Google Sheets, Derrick delivers more predictable ROI and fewer hidden costs.

### How does Evaboot compare to vayne for data enrichment?

Evaboot and Vayne serve different enrichment purposes but both fall short for complete prospecting workflows. Evaboot excels at lead scoring and CRM integration but struggles with advanced data enrichment depth and processing speed at scale, particularly above 500K records. Vayne focuses on high-volume LinkedIn extraction up to 15,000 profiles daily but critically lacks contact enrichment—it scrapes profile data without providing emails or phone numbers, forcing users to purchase separate enrichment tools. Unlike both, Derrick offers native Google Sheets integration with comprehensive enrichment including 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, and AI-powered insights all within one platform, eliminating CSV friction and multiple tool subscriptions while preserving monthly credits.

### Can Derrick replace both Evaboot and vayne effectively?

Derrick cannot be a perfect one-to-one replacement for both Evaboot and Vayne in every scenario, but it often serves as a stronger, more integrated alternative for B2B prospecting. Evaboot excels at intuitive lead scoring and CRM-friendly automation, yet Derrick adds native Google Sheets, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation that reduce handoffs and unlock deeper insights without exporting to CSV. Vayne specializes in high-volume LinkedIn scraping but lacks built-in contact enrichment, native CRM integration, and real-time validation; Derrick consolidates data enrichment (emails, phones, firmographics) directly in Sheets, with 50+ enrichment attributes and AI capabilities. In short, Derrick can effectively cover many core needs of both platforms, often with a more seamless workflow and cost efficiency, though teams relying on extremely specialized features of Evaboot or massive LinkedIn scraping volumes may still benefit from using Evaboot or Vayne in tandem.