# Getprospect Vs Captain Data : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: GetProspect specializes in LinkedIn-based prospecting with email finder and Chrome extension workflows, while Captain Data automates multi-platform web scraping and data extraction via API integrations. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with real-time enrichment across 100+ data points, eliminating CSV exports and starting at €9 per month with credit rollover. Choose GetProspect for LinkedIn-first prospecting, Captain Data for API-driven automation, or Derrick for native Sheets workflows without platform switching.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/getprospect-vs-captain-data-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare GetProspect vs Captain Data  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![GetProspect vs Captain Data vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab3025292546a5674e2a9_694536e7ba9b616166f1e7f2_image_1766143719058.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Getprospect Or Captain Data

### Real-time verification and enrichment without LinkedIn-only limits

GetProspect and Captain Data rely heavily on LinkedIn-centric workflows, which cap real-time verification and enrichment to LinkedIn-derived data and limited cross-source validation. Derrick delivers real-time verification and enrichment that extends beyond LinkedIn, integrating 100% native Google Sheets workflows without CSV exports. This translates to tangible gains like faster list hygiene and higher deliverability, with real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes per contact. For quick use cases, Derrick enables immediate enrichment directly in Sheets, eliminating LinkedIn-only bottlenecks and freeing teams from platform-bound constraints.

### 30x faster up-sell-ready data enrichment workflows with Derrick

Derrick delivers 30x faster up-sell-ready data enrichment workflows by fully leveraging 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating export steps and CSV handoffs that GetProspect and Captain Data rely on for enrichment. GetProspect and Captain Data struggle with multi-source depth and real-time up-sell readiness, whereas Derrick integrates 50+ attributes, live email validation, and AI scoring directly inside Sheets for instant readiness. This translates to significant time savings and faster pipeline progression, with measurable gains like 5-10h/month reclaimed and quicker stance to engage. For quick wins, you can run automated enrichments on new accounts right in your existing sheet, no context switching required.

### Immediate, multi-source data enrichment without data silos across tools

GetProspect and Captain Data typically deliver standalone prospecting or scraping results without seamless cross-tool data synchronization, leaving silos that complicate multi-source enrichment. Derrick solves this by delivering immediate, multi-source enrichment directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, uniting contacts, companies, and firmographics without exporting or switching apps. Teams can validate and enrich across sources in real time, reducing data handoffs and manual stitching, with measurable gains like 5-10h saved per month per user. For example, Derrick consolidates 50+ attributes per contact in one workflow, avoiding siloed data traps inherent to GetProspect or Captain Data.

## GetProspect vs Captain Data vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [GetProspect](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-getprospect/) | Derrick App | [Captain Data](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-captain-data-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 399$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs GetProspect main difference for outreach?

Derrick and GetProspect differ fundamentally in their approach to outreach workflows. GetProspect excels as a standalone prospecting platform with strong email verification and lead database access, but requires CSV exports and external CRM integration. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating export friction and enabling real-time email validation directly in your spreadsheet. Additionally, Derrick includes integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT for automatic prospect segmentation, while GetProspect relies on manual filtering. For teams already using Google Sheets, Derrick reduces setup time by five to ten hours monthly compared to GetProspect's traditional workflow approach.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to GetProspect for teams?

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to GetProspect depends on your team's specific needs. GetProspect excels at contact verification and email validation for straightforward prospecting at scale, making it reliable for volume-based outreach. However, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or external platforms, saving teams five to ten hours monthly on data management. Derrick also includes integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT for automated scoring and segmentation, offers fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact, and features rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier. If your team prioritizes seamless workflow integration within existing tools and deeper enrichment capabilities, Derrick provides more flexibility and cost efficiency than GetProspect's traditional prospecting model.

### Can Derrick replace GetProspect for faster list building?

Yes, Derrick can replace GetProspect for faster list building, particularly if you're already using Google Sheets. Derrick is 100% native to Sheets with no CSV exports needed, saving five to ten hours monthly compared to GetProspect's external platform workflow. While GetProspect excels at contact verification, Derrick offers fifty plus enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with both Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide more flexibility than GetProspect's rigid monthly plans, making it ideal for teams prioritizing speed and operational efficiency without platform switching overhead.

### Derrick vs Captain Data: which is better for data enrichment?

For data enrichment, Derrick generally provides a stronger, more integrated experience than Captain Data, especially when you value native Google Sheets workflows and extensive enrichment attributes. Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment fields per contact, real-time email validation, and a broad ecosystem of 3000+ integrations through Zapier/Make/n8n, all without exporting to CSV or complex setups. Captain Data shines for LinkedIn-based prospecting and multi-channel enrichment, but often lags in deep firmographic coverage and scalable enrichment depth. If your priority is a seamless, sheet-centered enrichment with robust verification and automation, Derrick edges Captain Data, while Captain Data remains compelling for quick, LinkedIn-driven lead research.

### GetProspect vs Captain Data: which offers easier pricing?

GetProspect and Captain Data both offer straightforward pricing models, but they serve different use cases. GetProspect focuses on affordable contact verification with transparent tier-based pricing, while Captain Data's costs scale with data volume and LinkedIn automation features. Neither requires long-term contracts, making both accessible for small teams. However, Derrick stands out with rollover credits, no credit card required for the free tier, and transparent monthly pricing starting at just nine dollars. Derrick's flexible credit system means unused credits carry forward monthly, eliminating waste compared to competitors' fixed monthly allocations, while delivering 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation natively within Google Sheets.

### What are GetProspect review highlights vs Captain Data and Derrick?

GetProspect highlights focus on fast, scalable B2B lead generation with strong email verification, a user-friendly interface, and reliable CRM integrations, making it ideal for high-volume outreach and straightforward prospecting. Captain Data emphasizes LinkedIn-driven prospecting, automated data extraction, and multi-channel enrichment to speed up lead discovery. Derrick stands out with native Google Sheets enrichment (no exports), 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, integrated AI (Claude and ChatGPT) for scoring and segmentation, and extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations, all without a credit card for the free tier. Overall, GetProspect excels in quick list-building and deliverability, Captain Data in LinkedIn-centric automation and enrichment, while Derrick offers deeper, scalable data enrichment and automation directly within Google Sheets, reducing setup friction and ongoing admin.