# Heyreach Vs Expandi : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Heyreach specializes in LinkedIn-centric cloud-based outreach automation with team collaboration features, while Expandi focuses on individual LinkedIn automation with advanced personalization and safety controls. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment data points, real-time email validation, and €9 starter pricing with rollover credits, making it the native-spreadsheet alternative when teams need multi-channel data hygiene without LinkedIn platform dependence or separate automation dashboards.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/heyreach-vs-expandi-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare HeyReach vs Expandi  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![HeyReach vs Expandi vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab341f64fd061b5d8613f_694535dae6220020d128c610_image_1766143449987.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Heyreach Or Expandi

### Real-time validation and enrichment without LinkedIn dependence

HeyReach relies on LinkedIn-driven discovery and real-time validation within its own workflow, which can tether data to LinkedIn activity and limit multi-channel enrichment. Expandi focuses on automating LinkedIn outreach, not on independent data validation or rich enrichment outside LinkedIn data sources. Derrick delivers real-time validation and enrichment that is 100% native to Google Sheets, removing LinkedIn dependence and enabling 50+ attributes per contact with immediate email validation. By consolidating verification and enrichment inside Derrick, users save time, improve deliverability, and avoid platform-specific constraints, all while keeping credits reusable and integrated with your existing sheet workflows.

### Multi-Channel Depth: Rich Company Intelligence, No Niche Gaps

HeyReach and Expandi focus on LinkedIn-native outreach, but they leave gaps in multi-channel company intelligence and niche coverage. Derrick differentiates by delivering 50+ enrichment attributes across both contacts and companies, plus 3,000+ integrations and native Google Sheets enrichment, all without leaving LinkedIn as the sole data source. This yields measurable gains: up to 5-10 hours saved per month on data prep and richer firmographic insights that improve targeting accuracy by a noticeable margin. For quick use cases, Derrick enables real-time email validation and AI-driven segmentation within a single workflow, eliminating niche gaps that HeyReach or Expandi can’t fully close.

### Unified Data Hygiene for Multi-Channel Prospects

Unified Data Hygiene for Multi-Channel Prospects

HeyReach and Expandi largely focus on LinkedIn-centric outreach and data points, leaving gaps in cross-channel data consistency and deeper enrichment. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets data enrichment with real-time validation, removing the need for CSV exports or multiple apps, and ensures uniform hygiene across emails, phones, and firmographics. By normalizing and deduplicating across 50+ attributes and validating in real time, Derrick saves hours per month while maintaining deliverability and governance across channels. For teams pursuing multi-channel precision, Derrick’s unified hygiene eliminates data fragmentation and streamlines multi-channel campaigns in one workspace.

## HeyReach vs Expandi vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [HeyReach](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-hey-reach/) | Derrick App | [Expandi](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-expandi-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 79$/mois | 9€/mois | 99$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the main difference between Derrick and HeyReach in outreach?

The main difference lies in scope and workflow integration. HeyReach focuses primarily on LinkedIn-to-email conversion, extracting contact data from profiles you've already identified, which means manual prospecting work remains significant. Derrick operates as a comprehensive data enrichment platform native to Google Sheets, enriching contacts with 50+ attributes including company intelligence, intent signals, and real-time email validation without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator. While HeyReach automates outreach sequences, Derrick emphasizes data completeness and preparation, making it ideal for teams wanting deeper prospect context before engagement. Both serve different stages of the prospecting workflow, with Derrick offering more flexibility through rollover credits and no credit card requirement for free access.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to HeyReach for multi-channel outreach?

Derrick offers a distinctly different approach to multi-channel outreach compared to HeyReach. While HeyReach focuses primarily on LinkedIn automation and email verification, Derrick operates as a native Google Sheets data enrichment platform that eliminates manual CSV exports and complex integrations. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact alongside real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and flexible monthly-rolling credits with no credit card required. For teams seeking broader data intelligence beyond LinkedIn-only workflows, Derrick's spreadsheet-native approach streamlines prospecting directly within your existing workflow, making it particularly valuable when combined with outreach tools like HeyReach for comprehensive multi-channel campaigns.

### How do Derrick and HeyReach compare on pricing and features?

Derrick and HeyReach take fundamentally different approaches to B2B prospecting. HeyReach specializes in LinkedIn-to-email conversion with strong CRM integration and verified contact discovery, making it ideal for teams prioritizing LinkedIn automation. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator or external platforms. Derrick's pricing starts at zero with rollover credits and no credit card required, while HeyReach operates on its own pricing model. For teams seeking comprehensive data enrichment with minimal setup friction, Derrick eliminates CSV exports and complex configurations that HeyReach workflows typically demand.

### Which is cheaper, Derrick or Expandi, for LinkedIn automation?

For LinkedIn automation specifically, Expandi and Derrick target different needs, so “cheaper” isn’t a clear-cut answer. Expandi pricing emphasizes volume-oriented LinkedIn automation with straightforward setup, while Derrick is a broader multi-channel prospecting tool anchored in a 100% native Google Sheets workflow. If you compare raw monthly spend for LinkedIn-only campaigns, Expandi may appear cheaper for high-volume LinkedIn tasks, but Derrick adds value with extensive data enrichment (50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation) and a reusable credit system that can reduce overall costs as you scale across channels.

### Can Derrick replace both HeyReach and Expandi in one platform?

Derrick can complement both HeyReach and Expandi by handling data enrichment and validation that neither platform specializes in. While HeyReach focuses on LinkedIn-to-email conversion and Expandi automates LinkedIn outreach, Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring directly in Google Sheets without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator or complex integrations. For teams seeking a unified prospecting center that combines contact discovery, enrichment, and intelligent segmentation, Derrick offers broader functionality than either tool alone, though they serve different parts of your outreach workflow.

### What are the pros and cons of Derrick versus Expandi and HeyReach?

Derrick stands out here as a 100% native Google Sheets-based prospecting platform that covers more than basic outreach by offering advanced data enrichment (50+ attributes per contact/company), real-time email validation for deliverability, and AI-assisted scoring, segmentation, and summaries with integrated Claude and ChatGPT. In comparison, Expandi excels at LinkedIn automation and multi-step sequences but focuses less on data enrichment and multi-channel attribution, while HeyReach emphasizes LinkedIn-to-email workflows and verified contact data but may require additional tools for deeper company insights. A key pro for Derrick is its no-Sales Navigator requirement, cost-effective credits system with rollovers, and broad automation via 3,000+ integrations, which can provide a more holistic, multi-channel prospecting approach than Expandi or HeyReach when you need richer data and customizable scoring within a Google Sheets-native workflow. Potential cons to watch: Derrick may require initial setup for full feature utilization, and users should validate how Derrick’s data enrichment scales for niche industries compared with specialized tools. Overall, Derrick offers broader data enrichment and flexibility that complements Expandi’s LinkedIn automation and HeyReach’s contact-first approach.