# Hunter Vs Evaboot : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Hunter specializes in email discovery and domain search with a large database but requires external tools for validation and enrichment. Evaboot focuses on LinkedIn Sales Navigator extraction with built-in email validation, priced at $29 monthly for 1,000 credits. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets at €9 monthly with 500 credits, offering 50+ enrichment data points, real-time email validation, and AI lead scoring without switching platforms, ideal for teams prioritizing workflow simplicity and credit rollover between months.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/hunter-vs-evaboot-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare hunter vs Evaboot  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![hunter vs Evaboot vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab143e5e219d66b9ec848_694535fb09e03582a7016feb_image_1766143482712.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Hunter Or Evaboot

### Enrich data fully in Sheets, minus external tools Real-time email validation included without extra steps

Derrick eliminates the need for external tools by fully enriching data directly in Sheets, a contrast to Hunter, which focuses on email discovery rather than complete in-sheet enrichment, and Evaboot, which excels at validation but lacks native, multi-dimensional enrichment in Sheets. Unlike Hunter or Evaboot, Derrick turns Google Sheets into a full prospecting hub with 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation, all without leaving the sheet. This results in tangible gains: up to 5-10 hours saved per user per month and a smoother, one-click workflow for data quality and outreach readiness. Use cases like instant scoring and segmentation stay in Sheets, enabling faster campaigns without switching apps.

### Real-time AI-driven lead scoring across teams

Hunter and Evaboot struggle with real-time, cross-team lead qualification, as Hunter focuses on email discovery and Evaboot emphasizes basic validation and workflow automation rather than AI-driven scoring at scale. Derrick delivers integrated AI-powered lead scoring across teams, using Claude and ChatGPT to automatically score, segment, and summarize leads in real time. This reduces qualification time and misalignment, with measurable impact: up to 25% faster routing and 15% higher qualified lead conversion. Derrick also preserves credits and requires no extra tools for teams collaborating on scoring.

### Unified data quality with real-time deduping across systems

Derrick addresses a common weakness exposed by hunter and Evaboot: real-time deduping and unified data quality across multiple systems. While hunter excels at email discovery but lacks comprehensive multi-source deduping and firmographic updates, Evaboot emphasizes basic data validation without real-time cross-system reconciliation. Derrick unifies data quality natively in Google Sheets, removing duplicates as contacts move between sources, and preserves consistency with 50+ enrichment attributes. Teams save up to 6–10 hours per month and reduce duplicate churn by 25–40% across datasets.

## hunter vs Evaboot vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [hunter](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-hunter-2/) | Derrick App | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 39$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Derrick vs hunter: which offers better pricing and features?

Derrick offers better overall value for most B2B teams compared to Hunter. While Hunter excels specifically at email discovery and verification with strong accuracy rates, it lacks comprehensive enrichment depth and requires supplementary tools for complete prospect profiling. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact alongside real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and operates entirely within Google Sheets without CSV exports or complex setup. Derrick's pricing starts at zero with rollover credits and no card required, making it more flexible and cost-effective than Hunter's tiered model, especially for teams seeking unified prospecting without tool fragmentation.

### Which is the alternative to Derrick for email discovery?

The main alternatives to Derrick for email discovery are Hunter and Evaboot. Hunter specializes in email finding and verification with strong accuracy rates but lacks comprehensive prospect enrichment beyond contact information. Evaboot focuses on lead scoring and qualification rather than email discovery itself. However, Derrick combines email discovery with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring—all natively within Google Sheets without requiring separate tools or CSV exports, making it a more complete solution for teams seeking unified prospecting capabilities.

### Derrick vs hunter vs Evaboot: which is the best overall comparison?

Derrick, Hunter, and Evaboot each serve different B2B prospecting needs. Hunter excels as a specialized email finder with strong verification accuracy but lacks deeper enrichment data. Evaboot focuses on lead scoring and automation but requires supplementary tools for comprehensive profiling. Derrick stands out by operating natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits with no card required for free access. For teams prioritizing streamlined workflows without technical overhead, Derrick delivers the most integrated solution directly where your data lives.

### How does hunter compare to Evaboot for data enrichment?

For data enrichment, Hunter excels at precise email discovery and verification with strong ease of use, but its enrichment depth stops at basic company context and contact details, making deeper profiling limited for multi-dimensional outreach. Evaboot offers straightforward data quality checks and lead evaluation but has limited native enrichment depth and fewer advanced insights for complex datasets. Derrick, by contrast, combines 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, native Google Sheets integration, real-time email validation, and AI-powered scoring and segmentation, all without exporting CSVs or complex setup. If you need robust, multi-attribute enrichment within a familiar Sheets workflow, Derrick provides stronger end-to-end value than either Hunter or Evaboot.

### Does Derrick replace both hunter and Evaboot effectively?

Derrick effectively complements both Hunter and Evaboot rather than replacing them entirely, depending on your needs. Hunter excels at email discovery and verification, while Evaboot focuses on lead scoring and qualification. Derrick, however, operates natively within Google Sheets and combines email enrichment with AI-powered scoring, intent detection, and 50+ contact attributes—all without leaving your spreadsheet. For teams wanting a unified platform that eliminates CSV exports and reduces tool sprawl, Derrick delivers comprehensive enrichment with rollover credits and no card required for the free tier, making it a more integrated alternative than layering both competitors together.

### What are Derrick’s pricing and key features compared to Evaboot?

Derrick’s pricing is credit-based and scales from a free tier with 200 credits to paid plans (Small 4,000 credits, Medium 10,000, Large 25,000, XL 100,000) with monthly rollover credits and no credit card required for the free tier. Key features include 100% native Google Sheets operation, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, built-in AI (Claude and ChatGPT) for scoring and segmentation, and extensive automation through 3,000+ integrations. Compared to Evaboot, Derrick offers deeper data enrichment directly in Sheets, no CSV exports, and stronger AI-driven prospecting workflows.