# Kaspr Vs Clay : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Kaspr excels at direct LinkedIn contact extraction with built-in phone finder, suitable for teams needing instant profile scraping. Clay offers powerful multi-source enrichment and automation via external workflows but requires API management and platform learning. Derrick provides 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ data points, real-time email validation, and no API rate limits, starting at €9/month with credit rollover—ideal for teams wanting spreadsheet-centric workflows without exporting data or switching tools.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/kaspr-vs-clay-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Kaspr vs Clay  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Kaspr vs Clay vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab3e3519cb441b0345f4e_694536d61b53d32a9e87cd7f_image_1766143701987.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Kaspr Or Clay

### Real-time validation without data gaps for every lead

Derrick delivers real-time validation for every lead, addressing Kaspr’s gaps where contact data can require secondary verification and Clay’s reliance on multiple sources can introduce delays. Unlike Kaspr or Clay, Derrick’s 100% native Google Sheets workflow provides instant email validation at the point of enrichment, reducing data gaps as leads are added. This translates to fewer bounced emails and faster outreach, with measurable efficiency gains across campaigns. Use cases show immediate list ready-to-send, without waiting for external verifications.

### Flexible multi-source data enrichment without API rate limits

Kaspr and Clay struggle with multi-source data enrichment under API rate limits, forcing teams to fragment workflows or slow down outreach. Derrick solves this by delivering flexible, native multi-source enrichment within 100% Google Sheets, eliminating export steps and external rate constraints. Users can enrich 50+ attributes per contact across multiple sources without hitting API throttling, saving time and accelerating campaigns. With Derrick, you gain scalable coverage and live updates inside Sheets, ready for immediate activation in sequences.

### Unified verification and enrichment across-platform workflow for speed

Kaspr and Clay both lock teams into platform-specific verification or multi-source workflows that force manual workarounds when switching contexts, slowing speed. Derrick unifies verification and enrichment across platforms inside a single, native Google Sheets workflow, eliminating context-switches and data gaps. Teams save time and reduce errors, delivering faster outreach with 20–35% quicker lead-to-contact cycles and a tangible 5–10h/month efficiency gain. With Derrick, you get 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation in one streamlined, extensible sheet-centric process.

## Kaspr vs Clay vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Kaspr](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-kaspr-2/) | Derrick App | [Clay](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-clay-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 149$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Which Derrick vs Kaspr comparison highlights key differences?

The key differences between Derrick and Kaspr center on platform architecture and data enrichment scope. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex integrations, while Kaspr focuses primarily on LinkedIn-based contact verification through a dedicated interface. Derrick provides 50+ enrichment attributes per contact with integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT, whereas Kaspr specializes in real-time phone and email verification with strong CRM integration. Additionally, Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier offer greater flexibility for teams with fluctuating prospecting volumes compared to Kaspr's consumption-based model.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Kaspr for LinkedIn-based outreach?

Derrick and Kaspr serve different prospecting needs. Kaspr excels at real-time phone verification and calling integration, making it ideal for phone-first outreach. However, Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving significant costs while offering 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT. For teams prioritizing streamlined LinkedIn-based workflows with minimal setup, Derrick provides a more efficient alternative with rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier.

### How does Derrick compare to Kaspr for pricing and value?

Derrick offers more flexible and transparent pricing compared to Kaspr, with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, eliminating waste from unused allocations. While Kaspr excels at phone verification, Derrick provides broader enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. Derrick's native Google Sheets integration eliminates setup complexity and CSV exports, saving teams 5-10 hours monthly. For budget-conscious teams, Derrick requires no credit card for the free tier and costs significantly less than Kaspr's subscription model while delivering more comprehensive company and contact intelligence without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator.

### Can Derrick replace Kaspr for contact enrichment effectively?

Derrick can effectively replace Kaspr for contact enrichment, but with key distinctions. Kaspr shines at real-time phone and email verification and seamless CRM integration, especially for LinkedIn-based prospecting, but it has limited multi-dimensional enrichment beyond contact data and can require supplementary tools for deeper firmographic or intent signals. Derrick, by contrast, offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation, and vast data capabilities within a 100% native Google Sheets workflow, plus AI-driven scoring and seamless automation across 3000+ integrations. For teams needing deeper, scalable enrichment and end-to-end prospecting inside a familiar sheet-based environment, Derrick provides a more comprehensive, flexible alternative, while Kaspr remains strong for quick contact-level enrichment with strong verification and LinkedIn-native workflows. Clay focuses on data aggregation and automation, but Derrick provides simpler setup, no CSV exports, and roll-over credits, making it a compelling replacement when scale and depth of enrichment are priorities.

### What about Derrick vs Kaspr vs Clay for overall pricing and features?

Derrick offers a more streamlined and cost-effective approach compared to Kaspr and Clay. While Kaspr excels at phone verification and Clay at workflow automation, Derrick provides comprehensive enrichment with 50+ contact and company attributes directly in Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports. Derrick's pricing is notably competitive, starting at just nine dollars monthly for four thousand credits with full rollover capabilities, plus integrated AI tools using Claude and ChatGPT for scoring and segmentation. Unlike competitors, Derrick requires no credit card for the free tier and eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving teams significant annual costs while delivering faster implementation and deeper company intelligence within your existing workflow.

### How do Kaspr and Clay differ in review and use cases?

Kaspr and Clay differ mainly in data scope, flow, and setup effort. Kaspr excels at real-time phone and email verification with LinkedIn-based prospecting and strong CRM integration, but its data enrichment is narrower and depends on public sources, sometimes requiring additional tools for deeper firmographics or intent. Clay offers broader data enrichment across multiple sources and robust workflow automation with strong email validation, yet data freshness and API rate limits can hinder high-velocity, highly precise campaigns. Derrick differentiates with 50+ enrichment attributes native to Google Sheets, real-time email validation, AI scoring, and seamless Zapier/Make integrations, all without complex setups.