# Kaspr vs Lusha : side-by-side breakdown for 2026 buyers

> **TL;DR** Side-by-side breakdown of Kaspr (linkedin phone & email finder (eu-first), from Free 15 emails + 5 phones/mo · Starter €45/mo) and Lusha (b2b contact data, from $49.90/month). Plus how Derrick App's Sheet-native enrichment fits the same job at $10/mo flat.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/kaspr-vs-lusha-vs-derrick-app*

---

## Why choose Derrick against Kaspr or Lusha

### Skip the dashboard — enrich straight from formulas
The friction with Kaspr and Lusha isn't the data quality — it's the workflow shape. Export from the platform, import into Sheets, hope the columns line up. Derrick collapses all of that into a single formula call. The enrichment happens where the data already lives, with the team that already owns the sheet.

### Forget per-seat math : $10/mo regardless of scale
Kaspr (Free 15 emails + 5 phones/mo · Starter €45/mo) and Lusha ($49.90/month) follow the SaaS-standard model : tier the features, cap the credits, upsell when you outgrow it. Derrick is the opposite — one tier, $10/month, no caps, no seats. Predictable spend for teams that hate budgeting around credit-pool refills.

### Plug Derrick into Claude / ChatGPT via MCP — no glue code
For teams adopting AI SDR / RevOps workflows : Derrick's MCP support means your enrichment layer is callable by any compliant agent (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, n8n with MCP nodes). Kaspr and Lusha require Zapier or custom code at this layer — a meaningful integration tax as AI-agent stacks mature.

## Comparison : Kaspr vs Lusha vs Derrick

|  | [Kaspr](/tools/kaspr-review) | Derrick App | [Lusha](/tools/lusha-review) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Entry price | Free 15 emails + 5 phones/mo · Starter €45/mo | $10/mo flat | $49.90/month |
| Free plan | Yes (limited) | 14-day full trial | 40 credits/month |
| Best for | EU-focused SDRs needing LinkedIn phone numbers | Sheet-native enrichment | SDRs prospecting on LinkedIn |
| Category positioning | LinkedIn Phone & Email Finder (EU-First) | Spreadsheet-native B2B data | B2B contact data |
| G2 rating | 4.4/5 | — | 4.3/5 |
| Founded | 2018 - acquired by Cognism in April 2022 | 2022 | 2016 |
| Email accuracy / verification | Standard | Real-time, included | Standard |
| Phone-number coverage | Yes (annual allocation) | Via integrated providers | Industry-leading mobile coverage |
| Credit / volume model | Confusing (3 pools, annual) | Unlimited rows in Sheets | 400 credits/month on Starter ($49.90) |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Per-row pricing (no credit caps) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| MCP-ready for AI / LLM agents | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |

## Kaspr vs Lusha vs Derrick App pricing in a nutshell

### Kaspr pricing (EU-focused SDRs needing LinkedIn phone numbers)
For eu-focused sdrs needing linkedin phone numbers, Kaspr linkedin phone & email finder (eu-first) starts at Free 15 emails + 5 phones/mo · Starter €45/mo. Tier ceilings, credit refresh rules, and per-seat economics are all detailed on the Kaspr pricing page below.
[Visit pricing](/tools/kaspr-pricing)

### Derrick App
Results first. Complexity removed. Native Google Sheets workflow, 100+ data points, AI-powered scoring, €9/month entry plan, 100 free credits.
[Discover Derrick](https://derrick-app.com/)

### Lusha pricing (SDRs prospecting on LinkedIn)
Lusha pricing entry sits at $49.90/month (b2b contact data). Sized for sdrs prospecting on linkedin. The detailed Lusha pricing breakdown (tier-by-tier feature matrix + true TCO) is on the dedicated pricing page.
[Visit pricing](/tools/lusha-pricing)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Kaspr vs Lusha: when does each fit best?
Kaspr is positioned as linkedin phone & email finder (eu-first) for eu-focused sdrs needing linkedin phone numbers. Lusha is positioned as b2b contact data for sdrs prospecting on linkedin. Both compete in the B2B contact data category, so the choice comes down to which best-for profile your team matches most closely. G2 reviewers rate Kaspr at 4.4/5 and Lusha at 4.3/5 — both products work, the deciding factor is workflow fit, not product quality.

### How do Kaspr and Lusha pricing actually compare in 2026?
Kaspr entry-paid tier : Starter at €45/mo (€59 annual). Next tier up is Business (€79/mo (€99 annual) - BEST VALUE). Kaspr's free tier : Yes - 15 B2B emails + 5 phones + 5 direct emails/mo. Lusha entry-paid tier : Starter at $49.90/month. Next tier up is Premium ($399.90/month). Lusha's free tier : 40 credits/month. As a cross-reference : Derrick App's $10/month flat fee covers unlimited Sheet rows — useful for teams that hate budgeting around credit refills.

### What's the biggest reason to pick Kaspr over Lusha?
EU-first GDPR-clean data quality. Built specifically for the French market and now powered by Cognism's verified data assets, Kaspr delivers among the cleanest GDPR-compliant EU contact data in the category. France, DACH, Iberia and Italy coverage is noticeably stronger than US-centric tools (Apollo, RocketReach, ZoomInfo). (Source : Verified G2 user, EU SDR Lead, G2 review (Q1 2026).) If this single capability maps to a real pain in your sales motion, Kaspr is the right pick over Lusha.

### What's the biggest reason to pick Lusha over Kaspr?
Best-in-class direct phone numbers. Lusha's mobile-number coverage is its single biggest moat. SDRs consistently report 60–70% dial-success rates on US/UK numbers — markedly better than Apollo or ZoomInfo for inbound mobile. (Source : Marcus L., SDR Manager, G2 review (Feb 2026).) If this is the differentiator that matters most for your stack, Lusha is the right pick over Kaspr.

### Can Derrick replace both Kaspr and Lusha?
Both Kaspr and Lusha compete in the B2B contact data category. Derrick is data-and-Sheets-native — it doesn't replace a full B2B contact data platform feature-for-feature, but it eliminates the data + spreadsheet layer that teams typically use alongside Kaspr or Lusha. For teams whose primary need is enrichment + list-building in Sheets, Derrick at $10/mo replaces 60-80% of typical B2B contact data stack workflows. For teams running heavy B2B contact data feature surface (sequencer, dialer, AI agents), Derrick complements rather than replaces.

### Beyond Kaspr and Lusha, what other tools should I evaluate?
Four other tools in the same competitive set worth evaluating : Apollo, Cognism, Findymail, Wiza. Each has its own positioning trade-off versus Kaspr and Lusha — Apollo typically appears as a direct competitor on G2 review pages, with Cognism, Findymail, Wiza as adjacent picks for different team sizes or use cases. For an apples-to-apples evaluation, run each candidate's review side-by-side against your specific procurement criteria.