# Lemlist Vs Apollo : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Lemlist excels at multichannel cold outreach with email warm-up and automated sequences, while Apollo provides a large B2B contact database with built-in dialing and email tools. Derrick App operates entirely inside Google Sheets with real-time email verification, 50+ enrichment data points, and rollover credits starting at €9 per month, making it ideal for teams who prefer spreadsheet-native workflows over standalone prospecting platforms. Choose based on whether you prioritize campaign automation, database size, or native Sheets integration.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/lemlist-vs-apollo-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Lemlist vs apollo  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Lemlist vs apollo vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab309906e7ecf4812ea9e_69453734a5a01e8be238955a_image_1766143796004.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Lemlist Or Apollo

### Verified data with real-time validation, without manual checks

Derrick tackles the data quality gap Lemlist and Apollo struggle with by delivering verified data with real-time validation directly inside 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating manual checks. While Lemlist relies on campaign-level data and Apollo emphasizes breadth, neither guarantees on-the-fly verification within your workflow, risking outdated or unverified records. Derrick validates each record in real time as you build and enrich, reducing manual cleanup and boosting deliverability confidence. With 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and instant email verification, teams save time and improve accuracy in one integrated sheet.

### Scale-ready 3000+ integrations for standout flexibility

Lemist and Apollo offer broad outreach capabilities, but their integration ecosystems can create delays or gaps when scaling to 3000+ connections, limiting flexible data workflows. Derrick delivers scale-ready flexibility by providing 3000+ integrations through Zapier/Make/n8n, enabling seamless, real-time data enrichment inside native Google Sheets. Customers can expect measurable time saved and smoother multi-tool orchestration as Derrick unifies prospecting steps without exporting data or complex setup. For fast, adaptable campaigns, Derrick keeps workflows frictionless with scalable integration coverage and movable credits.

### Streamlined data quality with real-time cleanup across platforms

Lemlist and Apollo often struggle with real-time data quality across multi-channel workflows, leaving gaps in consistent cleanup when campaigns span platforms. Derrick cleans and standardizes data in real time, unifying across Google Sheets-native workflows and external sources without extra exports. Users gain measurable efficiency: up to 20-35% faster data readiness and improved deliverability due to immediate deduplication, normalization, and validation. A practical use-case: a single Derrick workflow reconciles Google Sheets records with Apollo and Lemlist data on the fly, ensuring clean, actionable prospects without manual cleanup.

## Lemlist vs apollo vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Lemlist](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-lemlist-2/) | Derrick App | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 39$/mois | 9€/mois | 59$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs Lemlist difference for outreach teams?

Derrick differs from Lemlist and Apollo by operating entirely within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or separate platforms. While Lemlist excels at multi-channel email sequencing and Apollo focuses on contact database scale, Derrick prioritizes data enrichment efficiency with fifty-plus attributes per contact and integrated AI scoring using Claude and ChatGPT. For outreach teams already using Sheets, Derrick saves five to ten hours monthly on manual data work, offers rollover credits for flexible monthly spending, and requires no credit card for the free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking enrichment depth without platform switching or complex integrations.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Lemlist for automation?

Derrick offers a more streamlined automation experience directly within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports and complex setup that Lemlist requires. While Lemlist excels at multi-channel sequencing and email campaigns, Derrick focuses on data enrichment and AI-powered lead qualification with integrated Claude and ChatGPT capabilities. For teams prioritizing automation efficiency and native spreadsheet workflows, Derrick reduces manual preprocessing and delivers faster prospecting cycles. The choice depends on whether you need Lemlist's outreach sequencing or Derrick's enrichment-first approach combined with your existing tools.

### How does Derrick compare to Apollo for multi-channel outreach?

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating the need for external platforms or CSV exports that Apollo requires, saving teams five to ten hours monthly. While Apollo excels at contact database scale with 250 million verified profiles, Derrick combines enrichment with integrated AI scoring using both Claude and ChatGPT for deeper prospect qualification. Apollo focuses on volume prospecting, whereas Derrick prioritizes data intelligence and automation directly in your spreadsheet. For teams seeking multi-channel outreach without platform switching, Derrick's native integration with 3000+ tools via Zapier and Make provides more flexibility than Apollo's rigid API structure, particularly for custom workflows and real-time email validation.

### What’s the overall pricing difference Derrick vs Lemlist?

Derrick’s pricing is straightforward and credits-based, with a free tier and scalable options: Free 200 credits, Small 4000 credits for 9€, Medium 10000 credits for 20€, Large 25000 credits for 47.50€, and XL 100000 credits for 175€. Lemlist Pricing typically targets larger outbound teams with multi-channel campaigns and add-ons, often resulting in higher total costs as you scale. Overall, Derrick tends to be more cost-controllable for Google Sheets–native workflows, while Lemlist can cost more at scale due to its multi-channel feature set; consider your volume and required channels to compare accurately.

### Which is the better review: Derrick or Apollo for data enrichment?

Both Derrick and Apollo excel at data enrichment but serve different prospecting needs. Apollo's strength lies in its massive 250+ million contact database and real-time verification for high-volume outreach, making it ideal for teams prioritizing speed and scale. Derrick, however, operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or complex integrations, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes while saving 5-10 hours monthly. Derrick's rollover credits, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility for teams with variable enrichment needs. Choose Apollo for database breadth or Derrick for seamless workflow efficiency and cost-effective enrichment directly in your existing spreadsheets.

### Can Derrick replace both Lemlist and Apollo in a workflow?

Derrick cannot fully replace both Lemlist and Apollo in every workflow, but it can cover core data enrichment and AI-powered scoring needs while complementing those tools. Lemlist excels at multi-channel outreach and personalization across email, LinkedIn, and more, while Apollo provides a vast, verified contact database and outreach capabilities. Derrick shines with native Google Sheets integration, real-time email validation, AI-driven segmentation, and broad automation via 3,000+ integrations, plus cost-efficient credits and no credit card required for the free tier. In practice, most teams use Derrick alongside Lemlist or Apollo to fill gaps in data quality, enrichment depth, or multi-channel sequencing, rather than relying on Derrick alone for end-to-end outreach or contact discovery.