# Lusha vs SignalHire — which fits your stack in 2026?

> **TL;DR** Comparing Lusha and SignalHire on price ($49.90/month vs $39/month), feature surface (b2b contact data vs b2b contact data), and team-size fit. Plus Derrick as the Sheet-native third option.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/lusha-vs-signalhire-vs-derrick-app*

---

## Why choose Derrick against Lusha or SignalHire

### Sheet-native workflows : no export, no import, no friction
The friction with Lusha and SignalHire isn't the data quality — it's the workflow shape. Export from the platform, import into Sheets, hope the columns line up. Derrick collapses all of that into a single formula call. The enrichment happens where the data already lives, with the team that already owns the sheet.

### Transparent $10/mo : no credit caps, no seat fees
Lusha starts at $49.90/month ; SignalHire starts at $39/month. Both stack credits, seats, and feature unlocks per tier — your actual bill depends on usage you can't always predict upfront. Derrick is $10/month flat, unlimited rows enriched. That's the entire pricing page : one tier, one number, no overage exposure.

### AI-agent ready : Derrick speaks the Model Context Protocol
The AI-agent stack in 2026 looks different : Claude calls MCP-enabled tools directly, no glue code. Derrick was built MCP-native from day one. Pairing Lusha or SignalHire with an AI agent still means setting up Zapier flows, parsing JSON responses, and handling rate limits manually.

## Comparison : Lusha vs SignalHire vs Derrick

|  | [Lusha](/tools/lusha-review) | Derrick App | [SignalHire](/tools/signalhire-review) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Entry price | $49.90/month | $10/mo flat | $39/month |
| Free plan | 40 credits/month | 14-day full trial | 5 credits trial |
| Best for | SDRs prospecting on LinkedIn | Sheet-native enrichment | Tech + sales recruiters |
| Category positioning | B2B contact data | Spreadsheet-native B2B data | B2B contact data |
| G2 rating | 4.3/5 | — | 4.3/5 |
| Founded | 2016 | 2022 | 2015 |
| Email accuracy / verification | Standard | Real-time, included | Standard |
| Phone-number coverage | Industry-leading mobile coverage | Via integrated providers | 30-45% on tech roles |
| Credit / volume model | 400 credits/month on Starter ($49.90) | Unlimited rows in Sheets | Annual only — monthly forfeits |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Per-row pricing (no credit caps) | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| MCP-ready for AI / LLM agents | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |

## Lusha vs SignalHire vs Derrick App pricing in a nutshell

### Lusha pricing (SDRs prospecting on LinkedIn)
Lusha pricing entry sits at $49.90/month (b2b contact data). Sized for sdrs prospecting on linkedin. The detailed Lusha pricing breakdown (tier-by-tier feature matrix + true TCO) is on the dedicated pricing page.
[Visit pricing](/tools/lusha-pricing)

### Derrick App
Results first. Complexity removed. Native Google Sheets workflow, 100+ data points, AI-powered scoring, €9/month entry plan, 100 free credits.
[Discover Derrick](https://derrick-app.com/)

### SignalHire pricing (Tech + sales recruiters)
B2B contact data category : SignalHire entry tier is $39/month. Best-for : tech + sales recruiters. See the complete SignalHire pricing page for tier comparison, credit cap behaviour, and annual-vs-monthly delta.
[Visit pricing](/tools/signalhire-pricing)

## Frequently Asked Questions

### Lusha vs SignalHire: when does each fit best?
Lusha is positioned as b2b contact data for sdrs prospecting on linkedin. SignalHire is positioned as b2b contact data for tech + sales recruiters. Both compete in the B2B contact data category, so the choice comes down to which best-for profile your team matches most closely. G2 reviewers rate Lusha at 4.3/5 and SignalHire at 4.3/5 — both products work, the deciding factor is workflow fit, not product quality.

### How do Lusha and SignalHire pricing actually compare in 2026?
Lusha entry-paid tier : Starter at $49.90/month. Next tier up is Premium ($399.90/month). Lusha's free tier : 40 credits/month. SignalHire entry-paid tier : Lead Generation at $39/month. Next tier up is Recruiter Pro ($79/month). SignalHire's free tier : 5 credits trial. If you're looking past tier-based pricing entirely, Derrick App at $10/month covers unlimited rows enriched in Google Sheets — no credit caps, no per-seat math.

### What's the biggest reason to pick Lusha over SignalHire?
Best-in-class direct phone numbers. Lusha's mobile-number coverage is its single biggest moat. SDRs consistently report 60–70% dial-success rates on US/UK numbers — markedly better than Apollo or ZoomInfo for inbound mobile. (Source : Marcus L., SDR Manager, G2 review (Feb 2026).) If this single capability maps to a real pain in your sales motion, Lusha is the right pick over SignalHire.

### What's the biggest reason to pick SignalHire over Lusha?
Multi-platform coverage beyond LinkedIn. GitHub, AngelList, Stack Overflow, and personal websites are all supported in the Chrome extension. For technical recruiters sourcing engineers, this materially expands the addressable pool — most candidates' best public signal lives outside LinkedIn. (Source : Mei C., Technical Recruiter, G2 review (Feb 2026).) If this is the differentiator that matters most for your stack, SignalHire is the right pick over Lusha.

### Can Derrick replace both Lusha and SignalHire?
Both Lusha and SignalHire compete in the B2B contact data category. Derrick is data-and-Sheets-native — it doesn't replace a full B2B contact data platform feature-for-feature, but it eliminates the data + spreadsheet layer that teams typically use alongside Lusha or SignalHire. For teams whose primary need is enrichment + list-building in Sheets, Derrick at $10/mo replaces 60-80% of typical B2B contact data stack workflows. For teams running heavy B2B contact data feature surface (sequencer, dialer, AI agents), Derrick complements rather than replaces.

### Beyond Lusha and SignalHire, what other tools should I evaluate?
Four other tools in the same competitive set worth evaluating : Apollo, Kaspr, Cognism, Findymail. Each has its own positioning trade-off versus Lusha and SignalHire — Apollo typically appears as a direct competitor on G2 review pages, with Kaspr, Cognism, Findymail as adjacent picks for different team sizes or use cases. Each tool's full review on this site has the deep trade-off matrix — start there before shortlisting.