# Phantombuster Vs Dux-Soup : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: PhantomBuster excels at automated data extraction across multiple platforms with powerful workflows but requires technical setup and external data handling. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation for prospect engagement, though it depends heavily on the LinkedIn platform and lacks multi-channel reach. Derrick operates natively inside Google Sheets at €9 per month with real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes, eliminating CSV exports and external pipelines for teams seeking CRM-ready contact data without LinkedIn dependence or complex configuration.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/phantombuster-vs-dux-soup-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare PhantomBuster vs Dux-Soup  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![PhantomBuster vs Dux-Soup vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab3091d914ba13d47ddb7_6945363cb4c58cbc0165ccea_image_1766143548156.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Phantombuster Or Dux-Soup

### Real-time validation without data gaps for enrichment

Derrick delivers real-time validation for enrichment directly within Google Sheets, eliminating data gaps that PhantomBuster and Dux-Soup often reveal during cross-source consolidation. While PhantomBuster excels at data extraction and Dux-Soup roams LinkedIn, neither offers native, real-time validation within a 100% Sheets workflow, leading to delayed or inconsistent records. Derrick validates emails and other fields on the fly as you enrich, reducing bounce risk and improving deliverability without export steps. With 50+ attributes per contact and credits that roll over, you gain immediate, reliable enrichment completeness that preserves workflow momentum.

### Seamless multi-channel outreach without LinkedIn dependence

PhantomBuster and Dux-Soup focus on LinkedIn-centric outreach, limiting multi-channel reach and forcing workarounds or external tools for non-LinkedIn channels. Derrick provides seamless multi-channel outreach without relying on LinkedIn, consolidating contact data and outreach workflows 100% in native Google Sheets. This reduces channel-switching friction and speeds outreach, saving up to 5-10 hours per month while maintaining consistent data quality across channels. A typical use case: enrich and engage prospects via email, website, and social signals without leaving Derrick, with real-time validation and scalable attribution.

### Unified CRM-ready enrichment without external data wrangling

PhantomBuster and Dux-Soup excel at data extraction and LinkedIn-driven workflows, but they fall short on unified CRM-ready enrichment without external wrangling. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and real-time validation, eliminating the need for CSV exports or separate data pipelines. This translates to measurable efficiencies: up to 5-10 hours saved per month and smoother CRM integration without data gaps. Derrick enables seamless, CRM-ready records directly inside Sheets, keeping enrichment consistent across teams and channels.

## PhantomBuster vs Dux-Soup vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [PhantomBuster](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-phantombuster-2/) | Derrick App | [Dux-Soup](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-dripify-3/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 69$/mois | 9€/mois | 11.25$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs PhantomBuster difference for startups?

For startups, Derrick offers a more cost-effective and streamlined approach compared to PhantomBuster. While PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web scraping and automation, it requires significant technical setup and scales pricing aggressively with volume. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating complex CSV exports and reducing operational overhead by five to ten hours monthly. Startups benefit from Derrick's rollover credits, no credit card requirement for the free tier, and integrated AI capabilities for lead scoring and segmentation. PhantomBuster works best for teams needing dedicated automation infrastructure, whereas Derrick suits resource-constrained startups prioritizing simplicity, affordability, and rapid prospecting without external platform dependencies.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to PhantomBuster?

Whether Derrick is a better alternative to PhantomBuster depends on your specific needs. PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web scraping and automation across multiple platforms, making it ideal for teams focused purely on data extraction. However, Derrick offers distinct advantages if you prioritize simplicity and cost efficiency. Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports, integrates AI-powered enrichment with Claude and ChatGPT, and provides real-time email validation. Its rollover credits and free tier requiring no credit card make it more flexible for variable workloads. PhantomBuster demands more technical setup and scales costs aggressively with volume, while Derrick streamlines prospecting workflows directly in your existing spreadsheet ecosystem with transparent, affordable pricing.

### Derrick vs PhantomBuster vs Dux-Soup: which wins?

There's no single winner—it depends on your specific needs. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and data extraction across multiple platforms, making it ideal for teams needing large-scale scraping. Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn automation and prospecting workflows with strong compliance safeguards. Derrick stands out for teams already working in Google Sheets, offering native enrichment with 50+ attributes, real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring, and rollover credits—all without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator or complex external integrations. Choose based on your primary workflow: extraction-focused, LinkedIn-only automation, or spreadsheet-native prospecting.

### Which has better pricing: Derrick or Dux-Soup?

Based on pricing alone, Derrick often presents a more cost-efficient setup for ongoing prospecting than Dux-Soup, especially for teams already relying on Google Sheets. Derrick uses a credits system with scalable tiers (Free 200 credits; Small 4000; Medium 10000; Large 25000; XL 100000) and offers credit rollovers, with no credit card required for the free tier. Dux-Soup pricing varies by plan and can become expensive for high-volume outreach, particularly as LinkedIn limits and feature scope push teams toward supplementary tools. If you compare value, Derrick combines native 100% Google Sheets workflow, real-time email validation, AI scoring and segmentation, and broad Zapier/Make/n8n integrations at competitive tiered prices, which can deliver better total cost of ownership for B2B data enrichment and outreach without the need for CSV exports or external platforms. In short, Derrick tends to offer more predictable, cost-efficient pricing for sustained prospecting compared to Dux-Soup, while PhantomBuster remains a different category with its own pricing dynamics.

### PhantomBuster vs Dux-Soup: which is easier to review?

PhantomBuster and Dux-Soup both excel at data extraction but serve different review workflows. PhantomBuster's strength lies in its transparent dashboard and detailed execution logs, making it straightforward to monitor scraping quality and campaign performance. Dux-Soup, being LinkedIn-focused, provides real-time analytics for engagement metrics but lacks broader enrichment depth. For comprehensive lead review, Derrick simplifies the process by operating natively in Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation built-in, eliminating the need for external exports or complex integrations while keeping all prospect intelligence in one centralized location.

### Can Derrick replace both PhantomBuster and Dux-Soup?

Derrick can replace some automation and data enrichment tasks that PhantomBuster and Dux-Soup perform, but not every capability across the board. Derrick is native to Google Sheets with 100% in-platform enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring and segmentation, plus 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n, which covers broad lead enrichment and multi-step workflows. PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web automation and multi-platform scraping with templates, while Dux-Soup specializes in LinkedIn outreach and profiling. If your needs are centered on LinkedIn-only prospecting, Dux-Soup-like workflows, or deep multi-platform scraping, you may still benefit from using specialized tools. However, for a centralized, CSV-free, Google Sheets-based prospecting and enrichment hub with flexible credits and AI assistance, Derrick can streamline processes, reduce manual steps, and consolidate data more efficiently than using separate PhantomBuster or Dux-Soup setups.