# Phantombuster Vs Evaboot : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and automation across multiple platforms but requires external tools for validation, while Evaboot specializes in LinkedIn Sales Navigator exports with basic email verification. Derrick operates entirely inside Google Sheets with real-time email validation and 50+ enrichment data points per contact, starting at €9 monthly with credit rollover. Choose PhantomBuster for broad scraping needs, Evaboot for Sales Navigator-focused workflows, or Derrick for native spreadsheet enrichment without exports.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/phantombuster-vs-evaboot-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare PhantomBuster vs Evaboot  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![PhantomBuster vs Evaboot vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2a81a3b74f0211d9245_694535ff09e03582a7017325_image_1766143487012.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Phantombuster Or Evaboot

### Real-time validation and deep enrichment without external tools

Derrick delivers real-time validation and deep enrichment entirely within Google Sheets, avoiding external tools that PhantomBuster often relies on for data extraction and Evaboot for basic validation. Unlike PhantomBuster’s primarily scraping focus or Evaboot’s limited native enrichment, Derrick integrates live email validation and 50+ enrichment attributes directly in-sheet, reducing overhead and fragmentation. Teams save up to 5-10 hours per month while boosting deliverability by ensuring contact data is verified at the moment of capture. A practical use case: qualify leads on the fly during list build, with credits that roll over each month.

### Seamless 3,000+ integrations for scalable automation

PhantomBuster and Evaboot both offer automation and data extraction, but their ecosystems struggle with deep, scalable integrations beyond basic templates. Derrick delivers seamless 3,000+ integrations natively through Google Sheets, eliminating export steps and complex config. This translates to measurable outcomes: up to 25–40% faster workflow setups and a 5–10% lift in data enrichment accuracy across teams. With Derrick, you gain scalable automation without leaving your Sheets workspace, enabling faster multi-tool orchestration and cost predictability.

### Real-time data integrity through native Google Sheets workflows

Derrick tackles real-time data integrity head-on by embedding validation and enrichment directly within native Google Sheets workflows, unlike PhantomBuster or Evaboot which rely on external steps and post-processing. PhantomBuster’s data extraction can lag in real-time accuracy, while Evaboot often requires manual checks for ongoing validation; Derrick keeps checks inside Sheets for instantaneous feedback. With 50+ enrichment attributes per contact and real-time email validation, Derrick reduces data defects by up to 25-40% and accelerates outreach readiness within the sheet. A typical use case: auto-synced lead scores and updated firmographics as you type, eliminating data handoffs and bottlenecks.

## PhantomBuster vs Evaboot vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [PhantomBuster](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-phantombuster-2/) | Derrick App | [Evaboot](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-evaboot-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 69$/mois | 9€/mois | 39$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Is Derrick better than PhantomBuster for automation tasks?

Derrick and PhantomBuster serve different automation needs. PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web scraping and data extraction workflows with pre-built templates, making it ideal for teams focused purely on data collection. However, Derrick offers a more integrated approach, operating natively within Google Sheets without requiring CSV exports or complex setup. Derrick combines data enrichment with built-in AI capabilities using Claude and ChatGPT for intelligent scoring and segmentation, plus real-time email validation. For teams seeking automation without leaving their spreadsheet environment while maintaining flexibility with rollover credits, Derrick provides a more streamlined, cost-effective alternative that reduces manual data management overhead.

### Which Derrick vs Evaboot offers stronger data enrichment?

Derrick delivers superior data enrichment directly within Google Sheets with fifty plus attributes per contact and company, eliminating manual exports and complex integrations. Evaboot primarily focuses on lead scoring and qualification rather than comprehensive data enrichment, making it better suited for engagement tracking than enriching contact records with detailed firmographic intelligence. Derrick's real-time email validation, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits provide deeper enrichment capabilities at a lower cost, especially for teams already working in Google Sheets who want to avoid LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions and external platforms.

### Derrick vs PhantomBuster vs Evaboot comparison for features?

Derrick operates natively within Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex setup that PhantomBuster and Evaboot require. While PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and automation, it lacks deep enrichment capabilities. Evaboot focuses on lead scoring but requires external tools for comprehensive data intelligence. Derrick combines 50+ enrichment attributes, integrated AI with Claude and ChatGPT, real-time email validation, and rollover credits at lower cost, making it ideal for teams prioritizing simplicity and native spreadsheet workflows without additional platform switching or LinkedIn subscriptions.

### Does PhantomBuster pricing beat Derrick and Evaboot prices?

PhantomBuster pricing does not inherently beat Derrick and Evaboot across all use cases, and the comparison hinges on what you value most. PhantomBuster scales with usage and can be cost-efficient for quick, large-scale scraping, but its cost can rise quickly for high-volume, multi-step enrichment compared to Derrick’s credit-based model that applies to a 100% native Google Sheets workflow and offers monthly rollover credits. Evaboot’s pricing remains competitive for straightforward enrichment, yet Derrick adds unique value with 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and a broad automation ecosystem via Zapier/Make/n8n, all within Google Sheets without exports or credit card required for the free tier. If you need deep, ongoing data quality and advanced lead intelligence at scale, Derrick often provides a more economical and integrated solution relative to PhantomBuster and Evaboot.

### What’s the Derrick review compared to PhantomBuster?

Derrick is fully native to Google Sheets, eliminating the need for CSV exports or complex external workflows that PhantomBuster requires. While PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and automation, Derrick focuses on direct data enrichment with 50+ attributes per contact and real-time email validation built-in. Derrick's integrated AI using Claude and ChatGPT enables automated scoring and segmentation without additional tools, whereas PhantomBuster requires supplementary enrichment solutions. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier provide greater flexibility and cost predictability compared to PhantomBuster's volume-based pricing structure that scales aggressively with usage.

### Can Derrick replace both PhantomBuster and Evaboot?

Derrick can’t be considered a direct one-to-one replacement for both PhantomBuster and Evaboot, but it can cover many of the core needs they address—especially for teams prioritizing no-code data enrichment, lead scoring, and workflow automation within Google Sheets. PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web scraping and automation templates, while Evaboot concentrates on lead qualification and data quality with straightforward automation. Derrick differentiates itself with a 100% native Google Sheets experience, 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI for scoring and segmentation, plus extensive Zapier/Make/n8n integrations. If your use case centers on heavy data extraction and multi-source scraping, PhantomBuster’s strengths may still be unmatched; if you need rapid, user-friendly lead evaluation with CRM integration, Evaboot remains compelling. Derrick can complement or replace parts of these workflows, particularly where in-Sheets enrichment, scalable credit-based pricing, and AI-driven insights reduce manual steps and licensing complexity.