# Phantombuster Vs Surfe : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: PhantomBuster automates LinkedIn data extraction and web scraping through cloud-based workflows, while Surfe offers a Chrome extension for one-click LinkedIn profile capture into CRMs. PhantomBuster suits technical teams needing large-scale automation but requires setup and external validation tools. Surfe fits sales reps doing quick manual enrichment during prospecting. Derrick enriches 50+ data points per contact natively inside Google Sheets with real-time email verification at €9 per month, combining multi-source enrichment with instant validation in a single spreadsheet workflow.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/phantombuster-vs-surfe-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare PhantomBuster vs Surfe  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![PhantomBuster vs Surfe vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab2a99fbd28e7994d0bf2_6945340e09e03582a700578b_image_1766142989783.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Phantombuster Or Surfe

### Enrichment depth plus real-time validation without limits

Derrick addresses the limits of PhantomBuster and Surfe by delivering depth in enrichment combined with real-time validation directly within 100% native Google Sheets. Unlike PhantomBuster, which excels at extraction but often lacks deep enrichment and real-time data quality controls, Derrick adds 50+ attributes per contact with live email validation to ensure deliverability. This translates to measurable outcomes such as up to a 15-25% increase in qualified leads and reduced manual verification time, since credits are reportable and validation is instant. A typical use case: enrich a contact in Sheets and validate the email on the fly during outreach setup, eliminating separate post-processing steps.

### Unified data layers with multi-source enrichment beyond basics

PhantomBuster and Surfe excel at extraction and basic LinkedIn data capture, but they fall short on unified, multi-source enrichment and deeper data layers. Derrick delivers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact/organization across multiple sources within 100% native Google Sheets, eliminating CSV exports and complex configs. This results in measurable gains, such as up to 20-30% faster prospect enrichment cycles and improved data completeness for targeted campaigns. Use cases like multi-source firmographic enrichment and real-time validation are streamlined directly in Derrick, without leaving your worksheet.

### Effortless multi-source enrichment with expert data governance

PhantomBuster and Surfe excel at extraction and quick LinkedIn-focused workflows, but they fall short on multi-source enrichment and rigorous data governance. Derrick delivers effortless multi-source enrichment with centralized governance, eliminating the need for manual stitching and external validation. By tying 50+ attributes per contact with real-time validation and reportable credits, Derrick saves hours per month while improving data accuracy across sources. A typical use case: consolidate LinkedIn, company intelligence, and email verification in one native Google Sheets workflow, without complex integrations.

## PhantomBuster vs Surfe vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [PhantomBuster](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-phantombuster-2/) | Derrick App | [Surfe](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-surfe-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 69$/mois | 9€/mois | 29$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Is Derrick better than PhantomBuster for data enrichment?

It depends on your specific needs. PhantomBuster excels at large-scale web automation and data extraction across multiple platforms, making it powerful for bulk scraping tasks. However, Derrick offers deeper data enrichment capabilities directly within Google Sheets with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring without requiring external tools or CSV exports. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier also provide more flexibility. For comprehensive B2B enrichment with minimal setup overhead, Derrick delivers a more streamlined experience, while PhantomBuster remains stronger for pure extraction automation at enterprise scale.

### What’s the Derrick vs PhantomBuster difference in pricing?

Derrick offers significantly more transparent and flexible pricing compared to PhantomBuster. While PhantomBuster's costs scale aggressively with usage volume and can become expensive for high-frequency enrichment operations, Derrick provides rollover credits that never expire monthly, meaning you only pay for what you use without penalty. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, whereas PhantomBuster's entry-level plans involve higher per-record costs. For teams prioritizing cost predictability and data enrichment depth, Derrick delivers better value with 50+ attributes per contact and integrated AI validation.

### Can Derrick replace Surfe and PhantomBuster for outreach?

Derrick can effectively replace both Surfe and PhantomBuster for most outreach workflows, but with important nuances. While Surfe excels at LinkedIn extraction and PhantomBuster at automation, Derrick offers a unified solution native to Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes, real-time email validation, and integrated AI for scoring and segmentation. Unlike Surfe's single-source dependency or PhantomBuster's complexity, Derrick eliminates CSV exports and technical setup. However, if you rely heavily on PhantomBuster's web scraping capabilities or need advanced LinkedIn-specific automation, combining Derrick with specialized tools may optimize your stack. For teams prioritizing simplicity, cost efficiency, and comprehensive enrichment without LinkedIn Sales Navigator dependency, Derrick provides a more streamlined alternative.

### How does Derrick compare with Surfe for LinkedIn data?

Derrick compares favorably with Surfe for LinkedIn data by offering a broader enrichment capability directly inside Google Sheets, plus real-time email validation and AI-powered scoring, which Surfe does not natively provide. While Surfe excels at quick LinkedIn contact extraction and in-workflow prospecting via its browser extension, Derrick adds 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, over 3,000 integrations, and roll-over credits with a no-credit-card-free tier, enabling deeper lead intelligence and scalable outreach without leaving Sheets. For teams focused on LinkedIn-only extraction, Surfe is strong; for those needing richer data depth, validation, and seamless automation within a familiar spreadsheet environment, Derrick offers a more comprehensive solution.

### Which is the better pricing option: Derrick or Surfe?

Derrick offers more flexible pricing with rollover credits that never expire, while Surfe operates on a fixed subscription model without credit carryover. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes two hundred credits to start, whereas Surfe charges upfront regardless of usage volume. For teams with variable prospecting needs, Derrick's pay-as-you-go structure with monthly credit rollover typically proves more cost-effective than Surfe's fixed monthly commitment, especially when combined with Derrick's native Google Sheets integration that eliminates expensive tools like LinkedIn Sales Navigator.

### What are Derrick’s features versus PhantomBuster and Surfe?

Derrick differs from PhantomBuster and Surfe by being 100% native to Google Sheets, turning Sheets into a complete prospecting hub without CSV exports or complex setup. It offers 50+ enrichment attributes per contact, real-time email validation for deliverability, and integrated AI (Claude and ChatGPT) for scoring, segmentation, and auto-summaries, plus seamless automation through 3000+ Zapier/Make/n8n integrations. Unlike PhantomBuster, Derrick eliminates data enrichment gaps with built-in enrichment and validation, and unlike Surfe, it provides broader multi-attribute enrichment beyond LinkedIn data. Derrick also features monthly rollovers of credits, a free tier with no credit card required, and affordable tiered pricing, making it a more flexible long-term data prospecting solution for teams needing deep enrichment inside Sheets.