# Phantombuster Vs Wiza : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: PhantomBuster automates LinkedIn scraping and web workflows but requires Sales Navigator and external data validation. Wiza specializes in LinkedIn export enrichment with email finding, also needing Sales Navigator access. Derrick runs 100% natively inside Google Sheets at €9/month entry price, delivering 50+ enrichment attributes with real-time email validation and no CSV exports. Choose PhantomBuster for complex automation workflows, Wiza for LinkedIn-first teams with Sales Navigator, or Derrick for Google Sheets-native enrichment without external dependencies.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/phantombuster-vs-wiza-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare PhantomBuster vs Wiza  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![PhantomBuster vs Wiza vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab1568a2a94117a207794_6945337ed3bd712faa00e44b_image_1766142845650.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Phantombuster Or Wiza

### Real-time enrichment without data gaps or manual checks

Real-time enrichment is where PhantomBuster and Wiza fall short: both rely on external scraping or LinkedIn-centric data that can introduce gaps or delay with manual checks. Derrick delivers 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, eliminating CSV exports and manual verifications while automating data capture across 50+ attributes per contact. This translates to measurable gains: up to 5-10 hours saved per month per user and more consistent, real-time updates without data gaps. With Derrick, real-time validation and AI-powered scoring run inside Sheets, ensuring complete, up-to-date prospects at the moment of outreach.

### Unified data enrichment with deep company intelligence across engines and modules

PhantomBuster and Wiza excel at surface-level prospecting and automated scraping, but neither delivers unified data enrichment with deep company intelligence across engines and modules. Derrick integrates 100% native Google Sheets with 50+ enrichment attributes and AI-driven scoring across multiple engines, eliminating data silos and cross-tool gaps. Teams gain actionable, cross-sourced insights in real time, reducing manual verification and accelerating segmentation by up to 30%. A quick use case: automatically enrich and summarize company profiles within Sheets for faster outreach prioritization.

### Effortless Data Quality Validation Across Campaigns

PhantomBuster and Wiza excel at automation and data extraction, but often fall short on real-time data quality validation across campaigns. Derrick delivers effortless, in-platform data validation within 100% native Google Sheets workflows, eliminating post-scrape cleanup and external checks. Users typically save 5-10 hours monthly while increasing deliverability and accuracy across multi-source campaigns. With 50+ enrichment attributes and real-time email validation, Derrick ensures consistent quality without leaving Sheets or complex integrations.

## PhantomBuster vs Wiza vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [PhantomBuster](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-phantombuster-2/) | Derrick App | [Wiza](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-wiza-2/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 69$/mois | 9€/mois | 49$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### Derrick vs PhantomBuster: what's the main difference in automation?

The main difference lies in automation scope and execution environment. PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and data extraction through visual workflow automation without coding, handling large-scale tasks across multiple platforms. Derrick, however, operates natively within Google Sheets as a data enrichment platform, automating contact and company intelligence directly in your spreadsheet with fifty-plus enrichment attributes and built-in AI capabilities. While PhantomBuster focuses on collecting raw data through automation, Derrick automates the enrichment and qualification process itself, eliminating CSV exports and manual data processing. For teams prioritizing speed and simplicity within their existing workflow, Derrick's native integration approach saves significant setup time compared to PhantomBuster's external platform requirements.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to PhantomBuster for data enrichment?

Derrick and PhantomBuster serve different primary functions in the data pipeline. PhantomBuster excels at web scraping and workflow automation across multiple platforms, but requires external tools for comprehensive data enrichment and validation. Derrick focuses specifically on B2B data enrichment directly within Google Sheets, offering 50+ attributes per contact with real-time email validation and integrated AI scoring. Derrick eliminates the need for LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving around 1200 dollars annually, while PhantomBuster's enrichment capabilities often require manual verification or secondary tools. For teams prioritizing seamless enrichment without technical setup, Derrick's native Sheets integration and rollover credits provide more operational efficiency than PhantomBuster's automation-first approach.

### Derrick vs PhantomBuster vs Wiza: which offers the best pricing?

Derrick offers the most flexible pricing structure with rollover credits that don't expire monthly, eliminating waste for teams with variable prospecting needs. PhantomBuster scales aggressively with usage volume, making high-frequency enrichment expensive, while Wiza focuses primarily on LinkedIn automation rather than comprehensive data enrichment. Derrick's free tier requires no credit card and includes 200 credits, with plans starting at just nine dollars monthly. For budget-conscious teams needing comprehensive B2B enrichment without LinkedIn Sales Navigator subscriptions, Derrick delivers superior value through transparent, scalable pricing that adapts to your actual usage patterns rather than forcing you into rigid monthly commitments.

### How does PhantomBuster compare to Wiza in features and use cases?

PhantomBuster and Wiza serve different core needs: PhantomBuster is a web automation and data extraction platform with pre-built templates for social, scraping, and lead-gen tasks, offering rapid deployment and broad automation but with potential rate limits and less depth in data enrichment. Wiza specializes in LinkedIn-based outreach and verified contact data at scale, excelling in automation of connections and messaging but delivering surface-level data with limited enrichment. Derrick, by contrast, is a 100% native Google Sheets B2B data enrichment platform with extensive attributes per contact, real-time email validation, AI-driven scoring and segmentation, and thousands of integrations, all without requiring CSV exports or LinkedIn dependencies. If you need automated lead discovery and multi-source scraping, PhantomBuster and Wiza cover speed and outreach but may require additional tools for enrichment; for a unified, sheet-native enrichment workflow with strong scoring and retention, Derrick offers a more cohesive solution, complements outbound with richer data, and preserves credits within monthly rollovers.

### Could PhantomBuster replace Wiza for LinkedIn outreach?

PhantomBuster and Wiza serve different purposes, so replacement depends on your specific needs. PhantomBuster excels at web automation and data extraction across multiple platforms, while Wiza focuses exclusively on LinkedIn outreach automation. PhantomBuster can handle LinkedIn scraping but lacks Wiza's native automation for connection requests and messaging sequences. However, neither platform offers comprehensive data enrichment with real-time email validation that Derrick provides natively within Google Sheets. For a complete LinkedIn outreach stack combining automation, enrichment, and CRM integration without external platforms, Derrick's native Google Sheets approach eliminates the need for multiple tools while preserving your monthly credits.

### What are Derrick's pricing, features, and review highlights for SMBs?

Derrick pricing starts with a free tier offering 200 credits, then Small at 4,000 credits for $9, Medium for $20 with 10,000 credits, Large for $47.50 with 25,000 credits, and XL at $175 for 100,000 credits; credits are rollable and no credit card is required for the free tier. Key features for SMBs include 100% native Google Sheets integration (no CSV exports or complex setups), 50+ enrichment attributes per contact or company, real-time email validation for deliverability, built-in AI with Claude and ChatGPT for scoring, segmentation, and auto-summaries, plus 3,000+ integrations via Zapier/Make/n8n. Review highlights point to strong efficiency gains and ease of use for SMB teams, with notable advantages in eliminating Navigator-style costs and offering flexible credit-based budgeting, while some users appreciate the native Sheets workflow and real-time validation as essential SMB differentiators. When comparing to PhantomBuster and Wiza, Derrick stands out for its native Sheets workflow, richer enrichment, and multi-attribute scoring, reducing reliance on external tools for lead qualification.