# Wiza Vs Apollo : Comparaison

> **Quick answer**: Wiza automates LinkedIn outreach and list extraction but requires Sales Navigator ($100/month) and offers limited enrichment depth, while Apollo provides broad contact databases with built-in outreach sequences yet struggles with real-time data accuracy across all industries. Derrick enriches 50+ data points natively inside Google Sheets at €9/month with AI-powered validation, eliminating CSV exports and delivering 15-25% higher verified contact accuracy through automated cross-source checks, making it ideal for teams prioritizing workflow efficiency and data quality without platform switching.

*Canonical: https://derrick-app.com/vs/wiza-vs-apollo-vs-derrick-app*

---

Compare Wiza vs apollo  side by side to find the best sales intelligence tool for your B2B strategy.

[Discover Derrick App](https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/linkedin_email_phone_finder_ia_%E2%80%94_derrick/3746789989?flow_type=2)Free to use - No credit card required.![Wiza vs apollo vs derrick app](https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/6183d8bf5c36e7d98bfb2d98/694ab3351aef34ce737840f3_6945373be6220020d129afcc_image_1766143803143.png)

## Why choose Derrick against Wiza Or Apollo

### Save hours with native Google Sheets enrichment

Wiza excels at LinkedIn automation for outreach but falls short on deep data enrichment, while Apollo provides broad contact databases yet often requires manual verification for accuracy. Derrick turns Google Sheets into a 100% native enrichment hub, removing CSV exports and complex setups. By enriching 50+ attributes per contact directly inside Sheets with real-time validation, Derrick saves 5-10 hours per month per team. Use cases like quick list building and automated scoring inside Sheets illustrate immediate time savings without leaving your workflow.

### Real-time data accuracy across industries with AI scoring

Wiza and Apollo rely on their core data sources, which can yield inconsistent or incomplete enrichment across industries when real-time accuracy is critical. Derrick differs by integrating AI scoring (Claude and ChatGPT) to continuously validate and rank data quality, reducing reliance on a single source. This approach translates to measurable impact: faster lead qualification and a typical 15–25% lift in verified contact accuracy across sectors. For rapid-use cases, Derrick’s real-time validation streamlines onboarding and prioritization without sacrificing breadth of coverage.

### Unified data quality with automated validation across sources

Wiza and Apollo both rely on surface-level source data and struggle with consistent, cross-source validation, leaving gaps in unified data quality. Derrick solves this by automated cross-source validation within 100% native Google Sheets, ensuring consistent enrichment across profiles with real-time checks. This delivers measurable improvements in data accuracy and fewer manual corrections, saving hours monthly and reducing bounce rates in outreach. In practice, Derrick validates and harmonizes attributes from multiple sources, keeping credits, enrichment depth (50+ fields), and verifiable results in a single, auditable workflow.

## Wiza vs apollo vs derrick app Pricing in a nutschell.

|  | [Wiza](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-wiza-2/) | Derrick App | [apollo](https://derrick-app.com/en/alternatives-apollo/) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Works natively in Google Sheets | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Requires LinkedIn Sales Navigator ($100/month) | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Sales Navigator 1-click import | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Email finder with real-time validation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Phone finder from LinkedIn | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Company tech stack lookup | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| SimilarWeb & G2 insights integrated | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| AI integration (Claude & ChatGPT) | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Automatic AI Lead Scoring | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data cleaning & normalization | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Multi-platform scraping (Instagram, Twitter, Facebook) | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Zapier, Make, n8n integrations | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Public API available | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ |
| Entry price (paid plan) | 49$/mois | 9€/mois | 59$/mois |
| Permanent free plan | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Rollover credits to next month | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple and transparent credit system | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Simple setup & onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✕ |
| Complete documentation | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |

## Frequently Asked Question

### What’s the Derrick vs Wiza difference for data enrichment?

Derrick approaches data enrichment through native Google Sheets integration, allowing you to enrich contacts and companies directly without exporting CSVs or managing external platforms. Wiza focuses primarily on LinkedIn automation and outreach rather than comprehensive data enrichment, offering surface-level LinkedIn information that often requires manual validation. Unlike Wiza's automation-first approach, Derrick provides fifty plus enrichment attributes per contact and company, real-time email validation, and integrated AI tools for scoring and segmentation. Derrick's rollover credits and no credit card requirement for the free tier also offer more flexibility than Wiza's fixed pricing structure for teams with variable prospecting volumes.

### Is Derrick a better alternative to Wiza for outreach?

Derrick and Wiza serve different outreach needs. Wiza specializes in LinkedIn automation for connection requests and message sequences, operating within LinkedIn's ecosystem. Derrick, however, operates natively in Google Sheets as a comprehensive data enrichment platform with 50+ attributes per contact, real-time email validation, and integrated AI scoring via Claude and ChatGPT. While Wiza excels at LinkedIn volume, Derrick provides deeper prospect intelligence and enrichment without requiring LinkedIn Sales Navigator, saving significant annual costs. For teams wanting enriched data alongside outreach, Derrick's integrated approach offers more value than Wiza's LinkedIn-focused automation alone.

### Derrick vs Wiza vs Apollo: which is best for pricing?

Pricing varies significantly across these three platforms. Derrick offers the most flexible model with rollover credits starting at just 9€ monthly for 4000 credits, requiring no credit card for its free tier with 200 credits. Apollo and Wiza operate on higher subscription tiers with fixed monthly costs that don't roll over unused credits. For budget-conscious teams or those with variable prospecting volumes, Derrick's credit system provides better cost efficiency. Apollo and Wiza excel if you need comprehensive databases upfront, but Derrick's transparent, scalable pricing makes it ideal for teams wanting to control spending while accessing 50+ enrichment attributes per contact without LinkedIn Sales Navigator requirements.

### Which is Wiza vs Apollo better for data accuracy?

For data accuracy between Wiza and Apollo, Apollo generally delivers broader, real-time verified contact data with strong outbound capabilities, while Wiza emphasizes LinkedIn-based prospecting and email verification but ages more quickly in data enrichment and completeness outside LinkedIn profiles. Wiza’s strength is automated outreach with reliable contact verification within its scope; Apollo tends to provide higher overall data depth and consistency, though occasional manual verification may still be needed. Derrick complements both by offering 100% native Google Sheets enrichment, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring, enabling improved data quality without exporting to CSV or relying on external enrichment alone.

### What are Wiza vs Apollo review highlights compared to Derrick?

Wiza excels at LinkedIn automation and connection velocity, but operates in a gray area regarding LinkedIn's terms of service with account restriction risks. Apollo offers a massive contact database with strong email verification, though users report data accuracy inconsistencies requiring manual validation. Both tools lack deep data enrichment and require external platforms for comprehensive prospect intelligence. Derrick differentiates by operating natively within Google Sheets without CSV exports, offering fifty-plus enrichment attributes per contact, integrated AI scoring with Claude and ChatGPT, and rollover credits with no credit card required for the free tier, making it ideal for teams seeking comprehensive enrichment without platform switching or complex setup.

### Can Derrick replace both Wiza and Apollo for CRM work?

Derrick cannot fully replace both Wiza and Apollo for CRM work, as each tool targets different strengths. Wiza excels at rapid outreach automation and LinkedIn-based prospecting, while Apollo provides a broad, verified contact database and multi-channel outreach with strong data and enrichment capabilities. Derrick shines as a native Google Sheets enrichment and automation platform with extensive integrations, real-time email validation, and AI-driven scoring, but it does not replicate Wiza’s LinkedIn-centric workflow or Apollo’s large-scale contact database on its own. For a complete CRM workflow, many teams pair Derrick with Wiza or Apollo to cover outreach velocity, data enrichment, and prospect intelligence.