Clay is one of the most talked-about B2B data enrichment platforms right now. But between the credit-based pricing, multiple tiers per plan, top-up markups, and required tool stack, figuring out what Clay actually costs your team is anything but straightforward.
This guide breaks down every Clay pricing plan for 2026, explains the credit system in plain language, calculates the real cost per enriched lead, and surfaces the hidden expenses most comparisons skip entirely.
B2B enrichment without the credit math
Derrick runs natively in Google Sheets. Find emails, phones and LinkedIn data with unlimited credit rollover — starting at $9/month.
Clay Pricing at a Glance: 2026 Plans
Clay runs five pricing tiers. All plans include unlimited users — pricing is entirely credit-based, so team size has no impact on your subscription cost.
| Plan | Credits/month | Monthly price | Annual price | Cost per 1,000 credits | Rollover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free | 100 | $0 | $0 | $0 | ✅ (2x max) |
| Starter | 2,000 or 3,000 | $149 | $134/month | ~$67–75 | ✅ (2x max) |
| Explorer | 10K / 14K / 20K | $349 | $314/month | ~$22–35 | ✅ (2x max) |
| Pro | 50K / 70K / 100K / 150K | $800 | $720/month | ~$14–16 | ✅ (2x max) |
| Enterprise | Custom | Contact sales | ~$30K+/year | ~$8–12 | ✅ |
Annual billing saves 10% across all paid plans, with all credits granted upfront.
One thing that often surprises new users: each plan actually contains multiple credit tiers. The Starter plan comes in at 2K or 3K credits/month, Explorer spans 10K to 20K, and Pro ranges from 50K to 150K. The base tier is what Clay advertises — but you can upgrade within each plan for a higher credit volume at a lower per-unit cost.
Save up to $294/mo
$294/mo
How Clay’s Credit System Works
Clay credits are the platform’s internal currency. Every action you run — a data lookup, an AI enrichment, a workflow step — consumes credits from your monthly allocation.
The tricky part: credit consumption varies significantly depending on the data provider and the type of information you’re requesting. Clay aggregates 100+ data providers and charges their wholesale rates, which it passes through without markup. That’s a genuine advantage. But it also means the cost per action is highly variable.
Rough consumption benchmarks per action:
| Action | Credits consumed |
|---|---|
| Basic contact enrichment (name, title, company) | 1–3 credits |
| Email lookup (single provider) | 1–2 credits |
| LinkedIn profile enrichment | 1 credit |
| Mobile number lookup | 2–13 credits (provider-dependent) |
| AI/Claygent step | Variable |
| Data cleaning and formatting | Free |
The more expensive operations — mobile numbers in particular — can quickly exhaust a Starter allocation. A single mobile lookup via an expensive provider can cost up to 13 credits, meaning the $0.075 per-credit Starter rate translates to nearly $1 for one phone number.
Credit rollover: capped, not unlimited
Unused credits roll over to the following month, but only up to 2x your monthly allocation. On the Explorer plan (10,000 credits/month), you can bank a maximum of 20,000 credits. Any excess is lost.
For teams with seasonal prospecting cycles — heavy in Q1 and Q3, quiet in Q2 and Q4 — this cap frequently creates waste. Credits accumulated during slow months aren’t available when a big campaign launches.
This is one area where the contrast with tools like Derrick is sharpest: Derrick offers unlimited rollover on all paid plans, so credits never expire regardless of usage patterns.
The Real Cost Per Enriched Lead (Not Just Per Credit)
Cost per credit is a misleading metric on its own. What matters for SDRs and growth teams is the cost per fully enriched lead — the amount it takes to get a workable contact into your outreach pipeline.
A realistic enrichment workflow for a B2B contact typically looks like this:
- Find the LinkedIn profile → 1 credit
- Enrich company firmographics → 3–5 credits
- Find verified email → 1–2 credits
- Find mobile number → 2–13 credits
- AI-generated personalization context → variable
Using a mid-range estimate of 10 credits per enriched lead, here’s what that actually costs across Clay plans:
| Plan | Cost per credit | Cost per enriched lead (10 credits) | Monthly leads at base tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $0.075 | $0.75 | ~200 |
| Explorer | $0.035 | $0.35 | ~1,000 |
| Pro | $0.016 | $0.16 | ~5,000 |
The Starter plan at 200 enriched leads per month for $149 is where the math starts to look uncomfortable. At $0.75/lead for basic enrichment, you’re paying a significant premium for Clay’s workflow engine while barely stressing its capacity.
Pro is where the unit economics genuinely work. At ~$0.16 per fully enriched lead with AI personalization included, the value proposition versus a single-provider tool holds up — provided your team can build and maintain the workflows.
One critical note that most Clay pricing reviews miss: Clay charges credits for failed lookups. If you query three providers searching for an email address and none return a result, you pay for all three attempts. On pipelines with stale or incomplete data, this “miss rate” can silently burn 20–30% of your monthly allocation.
Clay Hidden Costs: What the Pricing Page Doesn’t Tell You
The subscription price covers roughly 40–60% of the real cost of running Clay at scale. Here are the additional expenses to budget for.
LinkedIn Sales Navigator: $1,188/year per user
Many of Clay’s most powerful LinkedIn enrichment features require an active Sales Navigator subscription. At $99/month per seat, a 5-person SDR team adds $5,940/year before a single Clay credit is spent. Some workflows work without it, but serious scale on LinkedIn enrichment effectively requires the subscription.
Derrick, by contrast, works autonomously in Google Sheets without requiring a Sales Navigator subscription — which is a meaningful cost difference for smaller teams.
Top-up credits: 50% markup
When you exhaust your monthly allocation, Clay offers additional credit top-ups — but at a 50% premium over your plan’s per-credit rate. An Explorer user paying $0.035/credit will pay approximately $0.052/credit for top-ups. During high-volume months or campaign surges, these charges can add $100–300 to the bill with no warning.
No CRM integration below Pro
The Pro plan at $720/month (annual) is the minimum tier with native CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive). Starter and Explorer users get enriched data into Clay tables, but syncing it to their CRM requires manual exports or custom Zapier/Make workflows — adding both friction and operational overhead.
The learning curve tax
According to multiple G2 and Reddit reviews, Clay takes several weeks to fully master. Teams typically spend 20–40 hours building their first production-ready enrichment workflow. For revenue ops teams without dedicated tooling resources, this is a real cost — either in consultant fees or engineer time.
Clay Alternatives: 10 tools worth considering in 2026
Looking for simpler or more affordable enrichment options? We compared the top Clay alternatives on price, features and ease of use.
Plan-by-Plan Breakdown
Free Plan ($0/month)
Clay’s free plan is designed for discovery, not production use.
What you get:
- 100 credits/month (1,200/year)
- Unlimited users
- Up to 100 results per people/company search
- AI/Claygent access
- Chrome extension
- Access to 100+ provider integrations
- Credit rollover (up to 2x)
Best for: Testing workflows and understanding how Clay’s interface works before committing to a paid plan. Not viable for any consistent prospecting volume.
Starter Plan ($134–149/month)
Credit tiers: 2,000/month or 3,000/month Annual pricing: ~$134/month | Monthly pricing: $149/month
The entry point for paid Clay use. Adds phone number enrichment, the ability to bring your own API keys, and up to 5,000 results per search.
Best for: Freelancers and solo operators running low-volume, high-precision prospecting. With 200–300 enriched leads per month at realistic consumption rates, this plan suits individuals rather than teams.
Key limitation: Highest cost per credit ($0.075), no CRM integration, no webhooks. A team doing serious outbound will hit the ceiling within days.
Explorer Plan ($314–349/month)
Credit tiers: 10K / 14K / 20K credits/month Annual pricing: from $314/month | Monthly pricing: from $349/month
A significant step up in both credits and capabilities. Explorer adds webhooks, HTTP API integration, and email sequencing integrations (Outreach, Salesloft).
Best for: Startups and growth agencies building more complex enrichment workflows, typically with a dedicated RevOps or growth resource managing Clay. At 10K credits, a 5-person SDR team running daily enrichment is comfortably covered.
Key limitation: Still no native CRM sync. Enriched data lives in Clay tables until manually exported or piped via webhook.
Pro Plan ($720–800/month)
Credit tiers: 50K / 70K / 100K / 150K credits/month Annual pricing: from $720/month | Monthly pricing: from $800/month
Pro is the first tier with native CRM integrations and the plan where Clay’s unit economics start to make strong commercial sense. At ~$0.016/credit, you’re getting Clay’s full capability stack at a price competitive with individual data providers.
Best for: Established GTM teams with 10–50 reps running end-to-end enrichment workflows, with Salesforce or HubSpot as the system of record.
Key advantage: CRM integrations, web intent data, optimal cost per credit. According to Vendr data, this is the most common plan for mid-market sales teams.
Enterprise Plan (Custom pricing)
Typical range: $30,000–$154,000/year (based on Vendr contract data) Typical credit volumes: 200,000–500,000 credits/month
Enterprise adds Snowflake integration, SSO, dedicated Slack support, credit analytics, unlimited table rows via Passthrough Tables, and AI prompting support.
Best for: Large organizations (100+ seats) with complex data governance requirements and high enrichment volume.
Clay vs. Derrick: Cost Comparison
Both tools offer B2B data enrichment with a credit-based model. Here’s a direct comparison on the metrics that matter most for budget decisions:
| Clay Starter | Clay Explorer | Clay Pro | Derrick Small | Derrick Medium | Derrick Large | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Credits/month | 2,000 | 10,000 | 50,000 | 4,000 | 10,000 | 25,000 |
| Price/month | $149 | $349 | $800 | $9 | $20 | $47.50 |
| Cost/credit | $0.075 | $0.035 | $0.016 | $0.0022 | $0.0020 | $0.0019 |
| Credit rollover | 2x max | 2x max | 2x max | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| CRM integration | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | Via Zapier/Make | Via Zapier/Make | Via Zapier/Make |
| Native Google Sheets | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Sales Navigator required | Often | Often | Often | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Important nuance on credit consumption: Derrick and Clay don’t use credits at the same rate per action. Some Derrick enrichments (notably phone finder) consume significantly more credits than Clay’s equivalent. The comparison below reflects actual per-action costs:
| Action | Clay Starter | Derrick Small | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| LinkedIn profile enrichment | $0.075 (1 credit) | $0.0022 (1 credit) | Derrick (~34x) |
| Email finder | $0.075 (1 credit) | $0.011 (5 credits) | Derrick (~7x) |
| Phone finder | $0.075–$0.975 (1–13 credits) | $0.33 (150 credits) | Clay |
For LinkedIn enrichment and email finding — the core workflow for most SDR teams — Derrick’s per-action cost is dramatically lower. Phone number lookup is the exception where Clay has an advantage.
Real-world scenario: 5,000 LinkedIn enrichments/month + email finding
A sales team enriching 5,000 profiles monthly, pulling email addresses for each:
Clay (Explorer, annual):
- LinkedIn: 5,000 × 1 credit = 5,000 credits
- Email: 5,000 × 1–2 credits = 5,000–10,000 credits
- Total: 10,000–15,000 credits → Explorer plan required at minimum
- Monthly cost: $314
Derrick (Medium, €20/month):
- LinkedIn: 5,000 × 1 credit = 5,000 credits
- Email: 5,000 × 5 credits = 25,000 credits
- Total: 30,000 credits → Large plan required
- Monthly cost: ~$50
Savings: ~$264/month = $3,168/year on this workflow alone, with no LinkedIn Sales Navigator requirement and no CRM export friction (Derrick lives directly in Google Sheets).
To get started with data enrichment in Google Sheets, Derrick’s approach removes the export step entirely — enriched data lands directly in the spreadsheet your team already uses.
Which Clay Plan Should You Choose?
Use this decision framework based on your monthly enrichment volume and workflow complexity:
Choose Free if:
- You’re evaluating Clay before any commitment
- You need under 100 enrichments/month for testing
Choose Starter if:
- You’re a freelancer or solo operator
- Monthly volume stays under 200–300 enriched leads
- You don’t need CRM sync (or handle it manually)
- Budget is tight and you’re comfortable with high per-credit cost
Choose Explorer if:
- You have a small team (2–5 people) actively prospecting
- You need webhooks and email sequencing integrations
- Monthly volume is 1,000–5,000 enriched leads
- You have someone who can build and maintain Clay workflows
Choose Pro if:
- Your CRM is Salesforce, HubSpot, or Pipedrive and you need native sync
- Monthly volume is 5,000–40,000 enriched leads
- You have dedicated RevOps resources
- The unit economics at $0.016/credit justify the $720+/month commitment
Choose Enterprise if:
- Monthly volume exceeds 50,000 enriched actions
- You have compliance, SSO, or data warehouse requirements
- You need dedicated support and custom SLAs
Total Cost of Ownership: The Full Picture
To evaluate Clay honestly, add these line items to the subscription cost:
| Cost component | Starter | Explorer | Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subscription (annual) | $1,608/yr | $3,768/yr | $8,640/yr |
| LinkedIn Sales Navigator (1 user) | $1,188/yr | $1,188/yr | $1,188/yr |
| Email sequencing tool | $600–1,200/yr | $600–1,200/yr | Included |
| Estimated top-up overage | $200–500/yr | $300–800/yr | $500–1,500/yr |
| Estimated total (1 user) | $3,600–4,500/yr | $5,800–7,000/yr | $10,300–11,300/yr |
These numbers assume a single user. For a 5-person SDR team, multiply the Sales Navigator and outreach tool lines accordingly.
This is the context in which Clay’s pricing should be evaluated — not the subscription alone.
To Retain
- Clay’s subscription is only 40–60% of the real cost: add Sales Navigator, outreach tools, and top-up overages to get the true number.
- The Starter plan costs $0.75 per enriched lead at realistic consumption — an expensive entry point for low-volume teams.
- Pro is where Clay’s economics make sense: ~$0.16/enriched lead with CRM integration and AI personalization.
- Clay charges for failed lookups — a silent credit drain that can reach 20–30% of your allocation on incomplete data.
- Credit rollover caps at 2x monthly, creating waste for teams with seasonal campaigns.
- For teams prioritizing LinkedIn enrichment and email finding without the tooling overhead, alternatives like Derrick offer comparable quality at significantly lower cost per action.
Conclusion: Is Clay Worth the Price?
Clay is a genuinely powerful platform for GTM teams that need flexible, multi-provider enrichment with workflow automation. For organizations with a dedicated RevOps function, mature prospecting processes, and $800+/month budgets, the Pro plan delivers strong value.
The challenge is the entry point. At $134–149/month, the Starter plan offers high per-credit costs, no CRM integration, and limited monthly volume — making it poorly suited to teams actually running outbound at scale. Many users find themselves jumping straight to Explorer or Pro once real workflows are in production.
If your team is earlier stage, budget-conscious, or simply doesn’t need Clay’s full workflow builder, there are leaner paths to quality B2B data enrichment with less operational overhead.
Run B2B enrichment for 90% less
Derrick enriches leads directly in Google Sheets — emails, phones, LinkedIn profiles — with unlimited credit rollover and no Sales Navigator dependency. Plans from $9/month.
FAQ
How much does Clay cost for a small team of 5? At minimum, a 5-person team should budget the Explorer plan ($3,768/year) plus LinkedIn Sales Navigator for each active user ($5,940/year) plus an outreach tool — totaling approximately $10,000–12,000/year before top-up overages. Clay Pro at $8,640/year includes CRM integration but the same Sales Navigator dependency applies.
Does Clay have a free plan? Yes. The free plan includes 100 credits/month (1,200/year), unlimited users, and access to 100+ data provider integrations. It’s sufficient to test workflows and understand the interface, but not for any consistent professional use.
Do Clay credits expire? Unused credits roll over to the next month, but only up to 2x your monthly allocation. Beyond that cap, excess credits are lost. This rollover policy can create waste for teams with variable monthly usage.
Does Clay charge for failed enrichment lookups? Yes. Clay charges credits for every enrichment attempt regardless of whether data is found. If your workflow queries three providers for an email address and all return empty, you pay for all three attempts. On pipelines with stale data, this failure rate can consume 20–30% of your monthly allocation.
What is the difference between Clay and Derrick? Clay is a standalone web platform combining 100+ data providers with workflow automation, targeting RevOps-heavy teams with $350–800+/month budgets. Derrick runs natively inside Google Sheets, enriches LinkedIn profiles, finds emails and phones, and integrates with CRMs via Zapier/Make/n8n — starting at $9/month with unlimited credit rollover. Clay has an edge on workflow complexity and mobile phone data; Derrick has an edge on price, ease of use, and LinkedIn/email enrichment cost per action.
Can I use Clay without LinkedIn Sales Navigator? Some workflows work without Sales Navigator, but many of Clay’s core LinkedIn enrichment features perform significantly better — or exclusively work — with an active Sales Navigator subscription. Budget for $99/month per user if LinkedIn is a primary source.
Article updated January 2026. Clay pricing based on official Clay.com documentation and third-party contract data (Vendr). Derrick pricing based on official derrick-app.com pricing page. Prices may vary based on negotiated contracts and promotions.