Pricing analysis FullEnrich lists $59/month as its entry tier. Real TCO depends on credit refresh cycles, seat scaling, and tier-upgrade triggers for advanced features. This breakdown unpacks the tier-by-tier inclusions + the 2-3 line items most buyers miss at signup, with Derrick App's €20/month entry plan as the comparison anchor.
Plans
FullEnrich ships 5 tiers. Per-seat pricing combined with a credit system for data lookups - the listed price is rarely the real cost.
FullEnrich pricing tiers - verified May 2026 against the vendor and cross-checked with our review data:
| Plan | Price | Best for | Limits / Inclusions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | $0 | Evaluation / testing | 50 credits (one-time) · 50 credits one-time evaluation · All waterfall providers active |
| Starter | $29/mo (~$26/mo annual (rollover 12 mo on annual)) | 500 credits/mo (waterfall 15+ providers) | 500 credits · 500 credits/mo (waterfall 15+ providers) · UNLIMITED users (rare in category) |
| Pro (base) | $55/mo (slider scales up) (~$49/mo annual (12-month rollover)) | 1,000 credits/mo base - slider extends to 50K credits ($1,950/mo monthly) | 1,000 credits (base) · 1,000 credits/mo base - slider extends to 50K credits ($1,950/mo monthly) · UNLIMITED users |
| Scaleups & Agencies | From $400/mo | Custom credit volumes above 50K/mo | Custom (50K+) · Custom credit volumes above 50K/mo · Volume discount negotiation |
| Enterprise | Custom | Custom credit pools (200K+) | Custom · Custom credit pools (200K+) · Dedicated CSM + SLA |
Credits
FullEnrich bills actions in credits with non-equal costs. A 5,000-credit plan does NOT mean 5,000 lookups.
FullEnrich pricing is credit-based with monthly tiers. The Starter tier at $59/mo (1,000 credits) is the typical entry point for solo SDRs replacing 2-3 individual enrichment subscriptions. Pro at $119/mo (2,500 credits) covers active sales reps or 2-3 person teams. Scaleups tiers ($249-$399/mo) scale credits + seats + advanced workflows.
Pricing-per-credit drops at higher tiers : Starter is ~5.9¢/credit, Pro is ~4.8¢/credit, Business gets down to ~2.6¢/credit. For teams running 5,000+ enrichments/month, the waterfall stops being cheaper than per-provider direct subscriptions purely on unit economics - the value shifts to hit-rate lift + operational simplicity.
Compare
How FullEnrich stacks against Derrick, Hunter, and the other tools we benchmarked.
Side-by-side : FullEnrich versus Derrick App on the cost lines that drive total spend, not just the headline tier price :
| Dimension | FullEnrich | Derrick App |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing entry | $59/month (1,000 credits) | Free plan · from €20/month |
| Data architecture | Waterfall across 15+ providers | no-install enrichment (web app, Sheets, Claude, API) |
| Hit rate | 15-30% lift vs single provider | Via integrated providers |
| Failed lookup cost | $0 (pay-only-on-match) | Same model |
| Built-in sender / LinkedIn | Not included | N/A |
| Per-credit cost at scale | ~2.6¢ (Scaleups tier) | Unlimited flat |
FullEnrich wins on hit-rate lift and stack-collapse economics for mid-volume enrichment workflows. Single-provider tools win at low volume on raw cost. Derrick is the web app or spreadsheet data layer most teams pair with FullEnrich.
What's included
What you actually get on FullEnrich's paid tiers (synthesised from real-user G2 + Capterra reviews) :
The verdict
FullEnrich is the right tool for teams currently running 2-3 separate enrichment subscriptions and frustrated by the operational overhead of fallback workflows. The waterfall architecture genuinely lifts hit rates 15-30% above any single provider, and the pay-only-on-match model removes the "paying for misses" problem that single-provider tools have. The platform fails for high-volume teams (>10K enrichments/month where direct provider contracts get better unit economics) and for teams wanting one tool for enrichment + sender + LinkedIn (Apollo and Reply.io bundle more). For its core ICP - mid-volume teams replacing 3+ enrichment subs - FullEnrich is one of the cleanest stack-collapse buys in the category.
derrick •
Install the add-on and enrich your lists without leaving your spreadsheet.
Install in Google Sheets →
https://app1.derrick-app.com/mcp Call the same enrichment endpoints straight from your own stack or workflow.
Read the API docs →No credit card · No contract
Switch to Derrick
Derrick is a web app: nothing to install, no credit card, 100 free credits every month.
Sign up on the Derrick web app. Nothing to install, no credit card required: you start with 100 free credits per month.
Upload the CSV you exported from FullEnrich, paste LinkedIn URLs, or import from LinkedIn Sales Navigator. The same actions also run in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API.
Pick the column to enrich and the data you need: emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack. Derrick fills the columns, and the email and phone finders only charge for what they find.
FullEnrich starts at $59/month (Starter tier - 1,000 credits/mo · API access · CRM integrations · 1 user). Higher tiers scale to Custom (Enterprise). For a credit plan whose unused credits roll over, Derrick App starts at 20 EUR/month for 10,000 credits spent in the web app, Google Sheets, Claude or the API.
FullEnrich's free tier provides 50 free credits on signup - useful for evaluation but rarely enough for production use. Paid plans start at $59/month. For a genuinely free entry point, Derrick App offers a free tier with 100 credits/month.
FullEnrich's headline price ($59/month) is the floor. API access is gated to Starter tier and above - Free tier is UI-only. Advanced waterfall configuration (custom provider priority, GDPR-only filters) gates to Pro. Phone-number waterfalls consume the same credit pool as emails but waterfalls for phones are inherently more expensive providers - heavy phone-enrichment teams may want to negotiate separate phone-pool pricing on Enterprise. Unused credits don't roll over by default - only Enterprise tier negotiates rollover.
FullEnrich starts at $59/month and scales with usage + seats. Derrick App runs on credits : a free plan with 100 a month, then 10,000 for 20 EUR, spent row by row in the web app, Google Sheets, Claude or the API, and what you do not use rolls over. For teams replacing 3-4 enrichment subs that don't need the full b2b contact data platform feature surface, Derrick is the lower-friction comparison anchor.
Tier-by-tier flexibility on FullEnrich depends on the plan. See the plans table above for per-tier credit caps, seat counts, and upgrade triggers. Annual billing typically saves ~15-30% versus monthly across the category. The free tier (50 free credits on signup) is genuinely free, but caps usage tightly.
For web app or spreadsheet workflows, Derrick App from 20 EUR/month is the most direct lower-cost alternative. For broader B2B database access at low entry cost, Apollo has a generous free tier (10K credits/month). For pure email finding, Hunter starts at €34/month. See the full FullEnrich alternatives guide for the ranked decision framework.
Keep exploring
Comparing options? These are the other database & intelligence tools we've torn down at the same depth - real per-credit cost, hidden fees, plan calculators.
SimilarWeb review: 3.5/5. Web traffic and competitive intelligence with sales signals, free extension then $199/month. For traffic-led ICPs,
See pricing →
HG Insights review: 3.1/5. Tech-stack plus IT-spend intelligence for enterprise targeting, custom from about $40,000/yr. For Fortune 5000 se
See pricing →
SalesIntel review: 3.3/5. Human-verified B2B contact data with intent, custom pricing from about $24,000/yr. For accuracy-first mid-market t
See pricing →
Pharow review: 3.6/5. French B2B data on INSEE/Sirene with email and phone enrichment, free trial then €99/month. For French outbound, not o
See pricing →Go further
Features, accuracy, integrations - everything beyond pricing.
Open the review → Top alternatives10 picks compared by use case : Google Sheets native, Sales Nav export, deliverability, enterprise.
See the ranking → Curated stackOur hand-picked shortlist across categories.
See the curation →