Clay vs FullEnrich vs Derrick in short. Clay: multi-source data enrichment with AI workflows. FullEnrich: waterfall enrichment · Multi-provider · Email + phone. Derrick is a B2B enrichment web app (nothing to install), also available as a Google Sheets add-on, a REST API and an MCP server (Claude and ChatGPT drive enrichment for you). It is free forever with 100 credits/month, with paid plans from €20/month, and it runs on its own or alongside Clay or FullEnrich.
Email + phone finders like Clay live on data freshness and source diversity. The side-by-side comparison below pits Clay's coverage by region, free-tier ceiling and credit-burn rate against Derrick's flat-credit pool that funds email + phone + LinkedIn + firmographics from one wallet.
Trusted byHands Down best extension for sheets till date. It eased up my linkedin lead collection journey by 10x. Thank you!!Rahul Nairfrom Google Workspace MarketplaceThis tool makes enriching LinkedIn URLs incredibly easy. You can enrich both personal and company profiles with a single click, and the Google Sheets integration is a game-changer.Pankaj Rohillafrom Google Workspace MarketplaceGreat extension. There's bigger companies that do 1000x less. Go with Derrick.Ben Leinenfrom Google Workspace MarketplaceIt makes my life a lot easier… no more copy and paste and time wasted. Thank you!Cris Forlanifrom Google Workspace MarketplaceDerrick is your one stop solution to data collection and up to date leads data automated collection. 100/100 value for money.Manu Nairfrom Google Workspace MarketplaceThis is one hell of a magical tool, it has blown my mind already, it's so handy, just love it. I am exploring how much more I can do with itJagdip Gohilfrom Google Workspace MarketplaceLoving the smoothness of the experience especially on Chrome. Great value for the price as well.GB Alaofrom Google Workspace MarketplaceI was looking for a tool to enrich LinkedIn data. Very easy to use.Keith Hildebrandfrom Google Workspace MarketplaceCURSOREasy to enhance contacts by running bulk lists. Try itJames Finlaysonfrom Google Workspace Marketplace +34,000 others
3 core reasons SDRs and ops teams switch to Derrick. Click to expand each.
01
Web app, nothing to install · also in Sheets, Claude, API
＋
The friction with Clay and FullEnrich isn't the data quality - it's the workflow shape. Export from the platform, import into Sheets, hope the columns line up. Derrick collapses all of that into a single step in its web app (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API). The enrichment happens where your team already works.
02
Transparent pricing : free plan, then €20/month
＋
Clay starts at Free / $134/mo (annual) ; FullEnrich starts at $29/month. Both stack credits, seats, and feature unlocks per tier - your actual bill depends on usage you can't always predict upfront. Derrick is credit-based : 100 credits a month on the free plan, 10,000 for 20 EUR. That's the entire pricing page : one tier, one number, no overage exposure.
03
Native MCP support : Claude + ChatGPT call Derrick directly
＋
For teams adopting AI SDR / RevOps workflows : Derrick's MCP support means your enrichment layer is callable by any compliant agent (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, n8n with MCP nodes). Clay and FullEnrich require Zapier or custom code at this layer - a meaningful integration tax as AI-agent stacks mature.
Replace Clay: enrich leads from their LinkedIn profile in Derrick's web app, nothing to install
Part 3 / 1003
Honest comparison
What each tool does better
We're upfront - every tool has strengths. Here's where Clay, FullEnrich, and Derrick each genuinely win.
Headline pricing rarely tells the whole story. Here's the real cost of running each tool for a year.
Cost item
Clay
FullEnrich
Derrick
Starting price
Free / $134/mo (annual)
$29/month (Starter)
€0 (free) · €20/month paid
Annual cost (base)
~$1,608/yr
~$348/yr
€0/year free · €240/year on Standard
Free plan?
Yes (limited credits)
25 free credits on signup
✓ Forever - 100 credits/mo
Setup cost
Hours to days
Hours to days
Nothing to install (web app)
Switching cost
CSV export + retraining
CSV export + retraining
Zero - works alongside any stack
Most teams pay 2-5x more on add-ons (extra seats, phone credits, integrations) than on the headline base price. Derrick keeps it to one transparent credit model.
Data Enrichment category : Clay entry tier is Free / $134/mo (annual). Typical use : gtm ops & technical sdr teams. See the complete Clay pricing page for tier comparison, credit cap behaviour, and annual-vs-monthly delta.
While other tools pile on features, complex setups, and pricing tiers that grow faster than your results, Derrick focuses on what actually matters:
getting usable leads, in a web app with nothing to install (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API).
No heavy workflows, No endless configuration. No learning curve.
For teams replacing 3-4 enrichment subs, FullEnrich b2b contact data starts at $29/month. Tier ceilings, credit refresh rules, and per-seat economics are all detailed on the FullEnrich pricing page below.
Derrick is a web app - nothing to install, no formulas to learn, no pipelines to migrate. Sign up and you're enriching in under a minute.
Web appnothing to install
Google Sheetssidebar
Claude · MCPjust ask
REST APIPOST /v1/enrich
Same engine, same credits
Open the Derrick web app
Sign up on the Derrick web app. Nothing to install, no credit card required - you start with 100 free credits per month.
+Add a column×
Enrich Leads
1 credit / profile
Full nameAName
Enrich Leadsmax 4
column B
Import your Clay list
Upload the CSV you exported from Clay, paste LinkedIn URLs, or import from LinkedIn Sales Navigator. Prefer to stay in your tools? The same features run in Google Sheets, in Claude (MCP) and via the API.
↑ Push to ▾
ANameEnrich Leads▶BJob title
1CamilleRunning✓ Done1 crRunningHead of Sales
2ThomasRunning✓ Done1 crRunningHead •• •••••
3SophieRunning✓ Done1 crRunningHe•• •• •••••
4InèsRunningNot found1 crRunning-
200 OK· or the same as JSON
Enrich your list with one click
Select the column with names, LinkedIn URLs, or company domains. Pick what you want - emails, phone numbers, LinkedIn data, company info, tech stack - and click "Enrich". Derrick fills the columns in your list. No pipelines, no waiting.
What teams say after switching from Clay vs FullEnrich
See what our customers say about Derrick.
323 reviews
"This app saved me so much time and effort. Great for anyone looking to build a contact list or network at scale quickly. As a start-up it's been invaluable."
Alex Clark
Director | SaaS GTM Leader
"Working pretty nifty compared to Snov.Io. Price wise it does give a fair shake, and IMO better interface since it's google sheets."
David Sire
Mortgage Broker at Zero Point Mortgage
"Derrick is a very simple and user-friendly app to enrich your contacts database. Best thing: you can test it for free. And then the price is so low, it's a no brainer."
Etienne Grange
CEO Form'actions
"I have been using other expensive apps or freemium like phantombuster, but Derrick has replaced them all. I love the simplicity of the Google sheet add-in, but what is best is the efficiency it delivers."
Julien Walon Cohen
CEO & Co-founder @ Diffly | B2B Sales Advisor
"Super easy to enrich linkedin urls using this tool. Both personal and company url data can be easily enriched with a click of a button."
Zaid Bilal
RevOps Professional
"Amazing Tool, I would like to advocate this to my colleagues. So that you can get more users. Keep it Up. 5 Stars!"
Asif Hanzala
Lead Generation Specialist at IdeaPeel
"The LinkedIn scraping and email finder combo is incredibly powerful. I can build a complete prospect list with contact info in under an hour. Absolute must-have for outbound."
Michael Kim
SDR Team Lead at CloudScale
"This app is fantastic. Brilliantly created to help small and mid sized businesses."
Dan Hughes
Founder/CEO, AlmanacIO
"Have tested over 10+ LI scraper apps, Derrick beats them all. Simple to use, accurate data, and affordable price."
Clay is positioned as data enrichment for gtm ops & technical sdr teams. FullEnrich is positioned as b2b contact data for teams replacing 3-4 enrichment subs. These are different category bets - Clay for its niche, FullEnrich for B2B contact data. Most teams either pick one based on primary use case or stack both for adjacent workflows. Both are established products with real user bases, so the deciding factor is workflow fit, not product quality.
How do Clay and FullEnrich pricing actually compare in 2026?
+
Clay entry-paid tier : Launch at $134/mo (annual) or $167/mo. Next tier up is Growth ($401/mo (annual) or $446/mo). Clay's free tier : Yes (limited credits). FullEnrich entry-paid tier : Starter at $29/month. Next tier up is Pro ($55/month base). FullEnrich's free tier : 50 free credits on signup. If tier-based pricing is what you are weighing, Derrick App starts free with 100 credits a month and moves to 20 EUR for 10,000, every credit usable in the web app, Google Sheets, Claude or the API.
What's the biggest reason to pick Clay over FullEnrich?
+
Best-in-class waterfall enrichment. If provider A misses, Clay automatically tries B, then C. This typically yields 20-40% more contact data coverage than any single source - measurable on email-finding accuracy especially. That is the capability to test against your own list before it decides anything.
What's the biggest reason to pick FullEnrich over Clay?
+
Hit rates that single-provider tools can't match. By querying 15+ providers in sequence, FullEnrich routinely lifts email + phone match rates 15-30% above what any single provider delivers alone. For hard-to-find prospects (small companies, EU markets, niche roles), the waterfall is the difference between a working list and a 40% empty one. That is the difference to test against your own workflow before it decides anything.
Can Derrick replace both Clay and FullEnrich?
+
Clay (data enrichment) and FullEnrich (b2b contact data) cover different category needs, so the question depends on which one Derrick maps against. Derrick is a web-app-first enrichment + search layer (also in Google Sheets, Claude and the API) from €20/month - it directly substitutes for the data layer of either tool. For the platform-specific features (sequencing, intent, automation), Derrick complements Clay and FullEnrich rather than replacing them outright.
Beyond Clay and FullEnrich, what other tools should I evaluate?
+
Four other tools in the same competitive set worth evaluating : BetterContact, Apollo, Dropcontact, Findymail. Each has its own positioning trade-off versus Clay and FullEnrich - BetterContact sits closest to them on the same use case, with Apollo, Dropcontact, Findymail as adjacent picks for different team sizes or use cases. Each tool's full review on this site has the deep trade-off matrix - start there before shortlisting.
Hands Down best extension for sheets till date. It eased up my linkedin lead collection journey by 10x. Thank you!! Rahul Nair from Google Workspace Marketplace 
This tool makes enriching LinkedIn URLs incredibly easy. You can enrich both personal and company profiles with a single click, and the Google Sheets integration is a game-changer. Pankaj Rohilla from Google Workspace Marketplace 
Great extension. There's bigger companies that do 1000x less. Go with Derrick. Ben Leinen from Google Workspace Marketplace 
It makes my life a lot easier… no more copy and paste and time wasted. Thank you! Cris Forlani from Google Workspace Marketplace 
Derrick is your one stop solution to data collection and up to date leads data automated collection. 100/100 value for money. Manu Nair from Google Workspace Marketplace 
This is one hell of a magical tool, it has blown my mind already, it's so handy, just love it. I am exploring how much more I can do with it Jagdip Gohil from Google Workspace Marketplace 
Loving the smoothness of the experience especially on Chrome. Great value for the price as well. GB Alao from Google Workspace Marketplace 
I was looking for a tool to enrich LinkedIn data. Very easy to use. Keith Hildebrand from Google Workspace Marketplace CURSOR Easy to enhance contacts by running bulk lists. Try it James Finlayson from Google Workspace Marketplace +34,000 others 
